血栓弹力图在颅脑损伤患者凝血障碍检查中的应用

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2018.02.002

目的

探讨血栓弹力图（TEG）作为TBI患者凝血功能障碍预测指标的可行性。

方法

选取山西医科大学附属大医院神经外科自2017年2月至11月收治的颅脑损伤（TBI）60例患者，根据入院GCS评分分为重型组（GCS≤8分）38例，轻型组（GCS>8分）22例，均于伤后24 h内同时行TEG及常规凝血检查，另选取同期16名健康体检者作为对照组，观察3组的各项凝血参数的差异；同时比较2种检查方法的相关性。

结果

3组对比常规凝血检查和TEG各项参数，活化部分凝血活酶时间（APTT）、血小板计数（PLT）的差异无统计学意义（Ρ>0.05），其余参数差异均有统计学意义（Ρ<0.05）；TEG参数与常规凝血检查指标存在一定的相关性，反应时间与凝血酶原时间、APTT呈正相关，凝血块形成时间与纤维蛋白浓度呈显著负相关，凝血块形成速率与纤维蛋白浓度呈显著正相关，最大振幅与PLT呈显著正相关。

结论

重型与轻型TBI患者凝血功能障碍存在差异性，前者更为严重；联合应用TEG和常规凝血检查可全面评估TBI患者早期凝血功能状态。

关键词: 颅脑损伤, 血栓弹力图, 凝血功能障碍

Objective

Investigated the feasibility of thrombelastogram (TEG) in detection coagulation disorder in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods

According to GCS scores, 78 cases gathered in Department of Neurosurgery, the Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, were divide into two groups: heavy group (GCS≤8 scores), 38 cases: light group (GCS>8 scores) 22 cases, and 16 healthy persons were selected as the control group. Comparing the difference of coagulation system functional changes performed within 24 h after injury in the three groups and analyzing the correlation between TEG and traditional coagulation.

Results

In each group, the differences of all indicators in TEG and traditional coagulation were statistically significant (P<0.05), but the differences of APTT and PLT were not statistically significant (P>0.05). And the correlation between the results reported by two methods existed in a certain degree. R value was positively correlated with PT and APTT, fibrinogen was positively correlated with α angle, but negatively correlated with K value, MA value was positively correlated with platelet count.

Conclusion

Coagulation disorder of patients with severe TBI appears more severe than that of those with mild one. Combined use of TEG and traditional coagulation can evaluate comprehensively the early coagulation status of patients with TBI.

Key words: Brain injury, Thrombelastography, Coagulation disorders

表1 3组患者的常规凝血功能指标对比（±s）

组别	PT(s)	APTT(s)	Fib(g/L)	PLT(×10⁹/L)
对照组	11.69±1.08	28.05±4.91	3.30±0.52	218.67±74.77
轻型组	12.64±0.92^a	22.70±2.50	2.61±1.23^a	194.87±72.03^a
重型组	13.63±1.95^ab	29.05±5.35^ab	2.14±1.20^ab	190.46±71.56^a
F值	18.363	0.860	11.891	1.411
Ρ值	<0.001	0.375	0.001	0.239

表1 3组患者的常规凝血功能指标对比（±s）

组别	PT(s)	APTT(s)	Fib(g/L)	PLT(×10⁹/L)
对照组	11.69±1.08	28.05±4.91	3.30±0.52	218.67±74.77
轻型组	12.64±0.92^a	22.70±2.50	2.61±1.23^a	194.87±72.03^a
重型组	13.63±1.95^ab	29.05±5.35^ab	2.14±1.20^ab	190.46±71.56^a
F值	18.363	0.860	11.891	1.411
Ρ值	<0.001	0.375	0.001	0.239

表2 3组患者的的血栓弹力图指标对比（±s）

凝血指标	R值(min)	K值(min)	α角（°）	MA值(mm)
对照组	5.35±1.06	1.65±0.37	67.22±4.04	63.71±6.73
轻型组	4.92±0.69^a	1.85±0.37	65.20±3.97^a	59.11±3.94^a
重型组	4.01±1.75^ab	3.44±3.15^ab	57.02±16.44^ab	56.01±13.55^ab
F值	12.016	8.591	9.831	6.290
Ρ值	0.001	0.004	0.002	0.014

表2 3组患者的的血栓弹力图指标对比（±s）

凝血指标	R值(min)	K值(min)	α角（°）	MA值(mm)
对照组	5.35±1.06	1.65±0.37	67.22±4.04	63.71±6.73
轻型组	4.92±0.69^a	1.85±0.37	65.20±3.97^a	59.11±3.94^a
重型组	4.01±1.75^ab	3.44±3.15^ab	57.02±16.44^ab	56.01±13.55^ab
F值	12.016	8.591	9.831	6.290
Ρ值	0.001	0.004	0.002	0.014

图1 血栓弹力图与常规凝血检测的相关性分析

[1]	Epstein DS,Mita B,O’Reilly G, et al. Acute traumatic coagulopathy in the setting of isolated traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Injury, 2014, 45(5): 819-824.
[2]	Laroche M,Kutcher ME,Huang MC, et al. Coagulopathy after traumatic brain injury[J]. Neurosugery, 2012, 70(6): 1334-1345.
[3]	Rossaint R,Bouillon B,Cerny V, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition[J]. Critical Care, 2016, 20(1): 1-55.
[4]	江利冰,蒋守银,张茂.严重创伤出血和凝血病处理欧洲指南(第四版)[J].中华急诊医学杂志, 2016, 25(5): 577-579.
[5]	张全,田恒力.创伤性脑损伤后凝血功能障碍的发生机制和治疗进展[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2016, 2(3): 173-177.
[6]	Kurland D,Hong C,Aarabi B, et al. Hemorrhagic progression of a contusion after traumatic brain injury: a review[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2012, 29(1): 19-31.
[7]	Palta S,Saroa R,Palta A. Overview of the coagulation system[J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2014, 58(5): 515-523.
[8]	Lustenberger T,Talving P,Kobayashi L, et al. Time course of coagulation in isolated severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Injury, 2010, 41(9): 924-928.
[9]	Whiting D,DiNardo JA. TEG and ROTEM: Technology and clinical applications[J]. Am J Hematol, 2014, 89(2): 228-232.
[10]	顾向进,王东,张党林,等.血栓弹力图和传统凝血功能检查在颅脑损伤手术患者的应用[J].江苏医药, 2017, 43(8): 540-543.
[11]	Davis PK,Musunuru H,Walsh M, et al. Platelet dysfunction is an early marker for traumatic brain injury-induced coagulopathy[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2013, 18(2): 201-208.
[12]	Wohlauer MV,Moore EE,Thomas S, et al. Early platelet dysfunction: an unrecognized role in the acute coagulopathy of trauma[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2012, 214(5): 739-746.
[13]	Spahn DR,Bouillon B,Cerny V, et al. Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline[J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17(2): R76.
[14]	Cando S,Tedo I,Kubota M. Posttrauma coagulation and fibrinolysis[J]. Crit Care Med, 1992, 20(5): 594-600.
[15]	叶永造,王占祥.颅脑损伤后凝血障碍研究进展[J].中华神经外科疾病杂志研究, 2012, 11(1): 85.
[16]	Harr JN,Moore EE,Wohlauer MV, et al. The acute coagulopathy of trauma is due to impaired initial thrombin generation but not clot formation or clot strength[J]. J Surg Res, 2011, 170: 319-324.
[17]	Sankarankutty A,Nascimento B,Teodoro da Luz L, et al. TEG and ROTEM in trauma: Similar test but different results?[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2012, 7(suppl 1): S3.

[1]	钱晓英, 吴新, 徐婷婷. 颅脑损伤并发呼吸衰竭患者早期机械通气的效果分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 526-528.
[2]	刘玲, 肖颖, 王蓉. 严重创伤并发肺部感染死亡病例分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 581-583.
[3]	李飞翔, 段虎斌, 李晋虎, 吴昊, 王永红, 范益民. 急性颅脑损伤继发下肢静脉血栓的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 277-282.
[4]	潘立, 谢理政, 程宏伟, 茆翔. 创伤性颅脑损伤后垂体功能减退[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 308-312.
[5]	王景景, 符锋, 李建伟, 任党利, 陈翀, 刘慧, 孙洪涛, 涂悦. 针刺对中型创伤性颅脑损伤后BDNF/TrkB信号通路的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 199-205.
[6]	张馨月, 韩帅, 张舒石, 李文臣, 张舒岩. 颅内压监测技术在创伤性颅脑损伤治疗中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 246-252.
[7]	张永明. 颈段脊髓电刺激治疗颅脑损伤后慢性意识障碍的进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 129-134.
[8]	王守森, 黄银兴, 陈宇晖, 胡晓芳, 刘海兵. 重型颅脑损伤的外科救治策略[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 190-192.
[9]	王召, 田进杰, 郭朝, 王蕾, 严红燕, 冯素娟, 张毅. 血浆PGK1早期检测对创伤性颅脑损伤患者病情严重程度及预后的预测价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 154-159.
[10]	何佳伟, 张良, 杨骐, 王占祥. 创伤性颅脑损伤后进展性出血性损伤的诊疗现状[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 175-179.
[11]	贾素英, 李倩, 郭姗姗. 创伤性颅脑损伤后血小板功能障碍的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 180-185.
[12]	李世明, 黄蔚, 刘玲. HMGB1介导脓毒症相关凝血功能障碍的作用机制及其治疗进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 269-273.
[13]	丁晶, 李培雯, 许迎春. 醒脑开窍针刺法在神经急重症中的应用[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 161-164.
[14]	张许平, 刘佳成, 张舸, 杜艳姣, 李韶, 商丹丹, 王浩, 李艳, 段智慧. CYP2C19基因多态性联合血栓弹力图指导大动脉粥样硬化型非致残性缺血性脑血管事件患者抗血小板治疗的效果[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 477-481.
[15]	黎力梦, 陶悦, 刘坚军, 李旭, 王晓俊, 汪涛, 陈斌, 范隆华. 血小板抑制不足与颈动脉支架植入术后不良事件的相关性研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 227-231.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Application of thromboelastography in detection of coagulation disorder in patients with traumatic brain injury

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

Application of thromboelastography in detection of coagulation disorder in patients with traumatic brain injury