切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 47 -50. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2022.01.010

经验交流

颅脑火器伤四例救治体会
陈宇晖1, 望家兴2, 田君1, 魏梁锋1, 王守森1,()   
  1. 1. 350025 福州,联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院神经外科
    2. 443099 宜昌市第一人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-11 出版日期:2022-02-15
  • 通信作者: 王守森
  • 基金资助:
    联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院院内课题(2020Z04)

Surgical treatment of craniocerebral firearm injury with clinical anlysis of 4 cases

Yuhui Chen1, Jiaxing Wang2, Jun Tian1, Liangfeng Wei1, Shousen Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, the 900h Hospital of Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou 350025, China
    2. Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Yichang, Yichang 443099, China
  • Received:2021-01-11 Published:2022-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Shousen Wang
引用本文:

陈宇晖, 望家兴, 田君, 魏梁锋, 王守森. 颅脑火器伤四例救治体会[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(01): 47-50.

Yuhui Chen, Jiaxing Wang, Jun Tian, Liangfeng Wei, Shousen Wang. Surgical treatment of craniocerebral firearm injury with clinical anlysis of 4 cases[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(01): 47-50.

目的

探讨颅脑火器伤(CFI)的救治策略和效果。

方法

选取联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院神经外科自2018年1月至2021年12月收治的4例CFI患者为研究对象,回顾性分析患者的临床资料,采用GOS评分评估患者的预后。

结果

所有患者均接受及时开颅清创手术和术后综合治疗。存活3例,其中1例术后左上肢肌力3级,左下肢肌力1级,右侧肌力正常;另2例患者恢复良好,其中1例留有轻微精神症状,1例随访期间无并发症及神经功能障碍。死亡1例,于术后2年因肺部感染、急性肾衰而死亡。

结论

CFI病情凶险,院前急救能为手术赢得先机,恰当的手术处理能增加生存概率,围术期管理有助于提高生存质量。

Objective

To investigate the treatment strategy and effect of craniocerebral firearm injury (CFI).

Methods

A total of 4 patients with CFI admitted to Neurosurgery Department of the 900th Hospital of Joint Logistics Team from January 2018 to December 2021 were selected. The clinical data of patients were analyzed retrospectively, and the prognosis of patients was evaluated by GOS score.

Results

All patients underwent craniotomy debridement and postoperative comprehensive treatment, 3 patients survived, 1 patient had left upper limb muscle strength grade 3, left lower limb muscle strength grade 1, and normal muscle strength of right side; 2 patients recovered well, 1 patient had mild psychiatric symptoms, and 1 patient had no complications and neurological dysfunction during follow-up. One patient died due to pulmonary infection and acute renal failure 2 years after operation.

Conclusion

The condition of CFI is dangerous, prehospital emergency can win the opportunity for surgery, and appropriate surgical treatment can increase the probability of survival, perioperative management can help to improve the quality of survival.

表1 4例颅脑火器伤患者的临床资料
图1 4例颅脑火器伤患者术前术后CT图A~B:右额部颅脑火器性穿通伤(病例1);A:CT矢状位,可见右侧额部和枕部子弹出入口及创道;B:术后30 min复查CT,提示侧脑室和第三脑室少量积血;C~D右侧颞部火器性盲管伤(病例2);C:CT横断位,示右侧额颞叶深部和基底核区血肿伴多发铅弹残留;D:术后1 d CT提示脑肿胀明显,多处铅弹残留;E~F:右侧颞顶部火器性反跳伤(病例3);E:CT横断位,可见右侧颞叶血肿形成,内有碎骨片,弹丸位于左侧颞叶,反跳轨迹贯穿大脑半球;F:术后1 d CT示右侧颞顶部少量血肿伴少量颅内积气;G~H:右额部火器性盲管伤(病例4);G:CT横断位,示右侧额叶血肿并散在骨碎片,枕叶可见一个金属碎片;H:术后1 d复查示右侧额叶骨碎片已清除,少量血肿残留
[1]
Global Burden of Disease 2016 Injury Collaborators, Naghavi M, Marczak LB, et al. Global mortality from firearms, 1990-2016[J]. JAMA, 2018, 320(8): 792-814.
[2]
Smith ER, Sarani B, Shapiro G, et al. Incidence and cause of potentially preventable death after civilian public mass shooting in the US[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2019, 229(3): 244-251.
[3]
Deng H, Yue JK, Winkler EA, et al. Adult firearm-related traumatic brain injury in United States trauma centers[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2019, 36: 322-337.
[4]
Geeraerts T, Velly L, Abdennour L, et al. Management of severe traumatic brain injury (first 24 hours). Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med, 2018, 37(2): 171-186.
[5]
Chowdhury T, Kowalski S, Arabi Y, et al. Pre-hospital and initial management of head injury patients: an update[J]. Saudi J Anaesth, 2014, 8(1): 114-120.
[6]
Pakkanen T, Nurmi J, Huhtala H, et al. Prehospital on-scene anaesthetist treating severe traumatic brain injury patients is associated with lower mortality and better neurological outcome[J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2019, 27(1): 9.
[7]
Gruen DS, Guyette FX, Brown JB, et al. Association of prehospital plasma with survival in patients with traumatic brain injury: a secondary analysis of the PAMPer cluster randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2020, 3(10): e2016869.
[8]
Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition[J]. Neurosurgery, 2017, 80(1): 6-15.
[9]
Wintermark M, Sanelli PC, Anzai Y, et al. Imaging evidence and recommendations for traumatic brain injury: conventional neuroimaging techniques[J]. J Am Coll Radiol, 2015, 12(2): e1-e14.
[10]
郭学军,赵明光,梁国标,等. 34例颅脑火器伤特殊类型的早期诊疗[J].中华创伤杂志, 2013, 29(9): 832-834.
[11]
Turco L, Cornell DL, Phillips B. Penetrating bihemispheric traumatic brain injury: a collective review of gunshot wounds to the head[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 104: 653-659.
[12]
谢佳芯,方芳,张社敏,等.平时颅脑火器伤临床救治体会(附235例报道)[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 7(1): 25-28.
[13]
Darwazeh R, Darwazeh M, Sbeih I, et al. Traumatic brain injury caused by missile wounds in the north of Palestine: a single institution’s experience with 520 consecutive civilian patients[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 116: e329-e339.
[14]
Wei LF, Wang SS, Jing JJ, et al. Surgical therapy for craniocerebral firearm injury[J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2013, 23(4): 491-497.
[15]
Edwards P, Arango M, Balica L, et al. Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury-outcomes at 6 months[J]. The Lancet, 2005, 365(9475): 1957-1959.
[16]
Sirko A, Pilipenko G, Romanukha D, et al. Mortality and functional outcome predictors in combat-related penetrating brain injury treatment in a specialty civilian medical facility[J]. Mil Med, 2020, 185(5-6): e774-e780.
[17]
常涛,李立宏.损伤控制外科理念及其在颅脑创伤救治中的应用[J].医学综述, 2015, 21(15): 2758-2760.
[18]
吴嘉铭,程龙飞,王向宇,等.损伤控制神经外科理念在双侧额叶脑挫裂伤患者救治中的应用[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2019, 18(6): 563-569.
[1] 余东阳, 修一平. 泌尿系统火器伤救治[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 105-109.
[2] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[3] 吴东阳, 林向丹, 石佐林, 赵玉龙, 王振, 文安国, 纪鑫, 李俊之, 赵明光. NF-L、NLRP3、S100B 蛋白在颅脑损伤严重程度及预后评估中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 279-285.
[4] 罗磊, 熊建平, 郑宏伟, 王嗣嵩, 柴祥, 吴青, 潘海鹏. 静脉留置针穿刺引流治疗颅骨修补术后硬膜外积液一例报道[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-317.
[5] 从长春, 王春琳, 武孝刚, 王金标, 章福彬, 孙磊, 王李. 重型颅脑损伤患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素及病原学分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 151-157.
[6] 毛进鹏, 陶治鹤, 刘琦, 王勇, 周明安, 陈劲松, 田少斌. 保守治疗大量创伤性硬膜外血肿的体会(附10例报告)[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 164-168.
[7] 辛强, 朱文豪, 何川, 李文臣, 陈勃, 王海峰. 神经胶质细胞来源的外泌体miRNAs对创伤性颅脑损伤后神经炎症的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 169-173.
[8] 鹿海龙, 朱玉辐, 贺雪凤, 蔡廷江, 王栋, 朱圣玲, 张恩刚, 王策. 创伤性颅脑损伤二次手术的危险因素分析及预警模型构建[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 97-101.
[9] 刘彪, 巍山, 关永胜. 基于Rotterdam CT评分及凝血功能指标的创伤性颅脑损伤预后预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 22-27.
[10] 罗丹, 柏宋磊, 易峰. HMGB1-TLR2/TLR4/RAGE通路与颅脑损伤并发认知功能障碍病情变化的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 28-34.
[11] 袁宝玉, 管义祥, 王东流, 陆正. 不同时机颅骨修补术治疗颅脑外伤的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 35-41.
[12] 李鑫, 刘炳辉, 程名, 王凡, 刘玉明, 周绍明. 基于Rotterdam CT评分评估的颅脑损伤术中控制性减压的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 16-21.
[13] 沈汉超, 何炯周, 田君, 魏梁锋, 王守森. 老年重型颅脑损伤合并脑疝患者预后不良的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 350-354.
[14] 胡志恒, 任洪波, 宋志远, 张运刚, 韩晓正. 血清sTIM-3及其配体Gal-9、CEACAM-1与创伤性颅脑损伤患者脑损伤程度及预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 201-207.
[15] 王晓静, 林家汉, 周桔丰, 李晨翠. 不同时机营养支持在改善重型颅脑损伤患者营养状态及免疫功能中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 335-339.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?