切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (05) : 265 -269. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2020.05.003

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

颅内压监测下控制性减压联合预缝式关颅在重型颅脑损伤手术中的作用探讨
阳建国1, 钟兴明1,(), 吴利平1   
  1. 1. 313000 湖州市第一人民医院(湖州师范学院附属第一医院)神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-30 出版日期:2020-10-15
  • 通信作者: 钟兴明
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2019KY678); 浙江省湖州市科技计划项目(2018GYB64)

Effect of controlled decompression combined with presuture craniotomy under intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury

Jianguo Yang1, Xingming Zhong1,(), Liping Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, The First People’s Hospital of Huzhou (The First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou Normal University), Huzhou 313000, China
  • Received:2020-06-30 Published:2020-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Xingming Zhong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhong Xingming, Email:
引用本文:

阳建国, 钟兴明, 吴利平. 颅内压监测下控制性减压联合预缝式关颅在重型颅脑损伤手术中的作用探讨[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 06(05): 265-269.

Jianguo Yang, Xingming Zhong, Liping Wu. Effect of controlled decompression combined with presuture craniotomy under intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 06(05): 265-269.

目的

探讨颅内压(ICP)监测下控制性减压联合预缝式关颅在重型颅脑损伤(sTBI)患者手术中的应用价值。

方法

收集2017年1月至2019年9月湖州市第一人民医院(湖州师范学院附属第一医院)神经外科收治的sTBI患者136例,其中2018年2月及以前收治的患者57例(对照组)术中均采取ICP监测下常规快速血肿清除及标准去大骨瓣减压手术治疗(未采取控制性减压),2018年3月收治后的患者79例(研究组)术中均采取ICP监测下控制性减压联合预缝式关颅手术。对2组患者的术中低血压、急性脑膨出、迟发性颅内血肿等并发症的发生率、脑组织暴露时间、关颅时间、颅骨去骨瓣情况、非计划再次手术及伤后6个月的GOS评分进行回顾性对比分析研究,明确ICP监测下控制性减压联合预缝式关颅这种手术模式在救治中的效果。

结果

2组患者的性别分布、年龄、受伤至手术时间、术前GCS评分、术前瞳孔散大、影像学资料及初始ICP等比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组术中低血压、急性脑膨出及迟发性颅内血肿的发生率较对照组低,脑组织暴露时间及关颅时间较对照组短,双侧颅骨去骨瓣率较对照组低,非计划再次手术率较对照组低,预后良好率较对照组明显提高,死亡率较对照组明显降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

ICP监测下控制性减压联合预缝式关颅模式的应用能降低sTBI患者术中低血压、急性脑膨出及迟发性颅内血肿的发生率,能降低患者非计划再次手术率或双侧颅骨去骨瓣率,改善患者的预后。

Objective

To investigate the application value of controlled decompression combined with pre suture craniotomy under intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).

Methods

One hundred and thirty-six patients with sTBI admitted to Neurosurgery Department of The First People’s Hospital of Huzhou (the First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou Normal University) from January 2017 to September 2019 were collected. Among them, 57 patients before February 2018 (control group) were treated with routine rapid hematoma clearance and standard large bone flap decompression surgery (without controlled decompression) under ICP monitoring, and 79 patients after March 2018 (study group), controlled decompression under ICP monitoring combined with pre suture craniotomy was adopted. The incidence of intraoperative hypotension, acute encephalocele, delayed intracranial hematoma and other complications, brain tissue exposure time, craniotomy time, unplanned reoperation and GOS score at 6 months after injury were retrospectively analyzed and compared between the two groups. It was clear that the operation mode of controlled decompression combined with presplitting craniotomy under ICP monitoring was effective in the treatment.

Results

There were no significant differences in gender distribution, age, injury to operation time, preoperative GCS score, preoperative mydriasis, imaging data and initial ICP between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidences of intraoperative hypotension, acute encephalocele and delayed intracranial hematoma in the study group were lower than those in the control group, the exposure time and closing time of brain tissue were shorter than those of the control group, the removal rate of bilateral cranial bone flap was lower than that of the control group, the unplanned reoperation rate was lower than that of the control group, the good prognosis rate was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the mortality rate was significantly lower than that of the control group (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

The application of controlled decompression combined with pre suture craniotomy under ICP monitoring can reduce the incidence of intraoperative hypotension, acute encephalocele and delayed intracranial hematoma, reduce the rate of unplanned reoperation or bilateral cranial flap removal, and improve the prognosis of sTBI patients.

表1 2组患者的一般临床资料比较
表2 2组患者手术相关并发症及其他相关资料比较
表3 2组患者的预后情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
阳建国,汪一棋,赵朝辉,等.脉搏指数连续心输出量技术在重型颅脑损伤患者中的应用分析[J].中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 9(1): 44-46.
[2]
赵鹏洲,柯以铨,吴敬伦,等.重型颅脑损伤患者颅内压与神经元特异性烯醇化酶、D-二聚体及C反应蛋白的相关性研究[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2015, 14(5): 506-510.
[3]
阳建国,钟兴明,汪一棋,等.脉搏指数连续心排血量与颅内压联合监测在重型颅脑损伤患者治疗中的应用价值[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2019, 18(12): 1201-1208.
[4]
高亮.美国第四版《重型颅脑损伤救治指南》解读[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2017, 3(6): 321-324.
[5]
沈亮,苏忠周,周跃.控制减压治疗重型颅脑损伤的Meta分析[J].中华创伤杂志, 2016, 32(5): 406-409.
[6]
龙连圣,辛志成,王伟,等.急性双侧大脑半球弥漫性脑肿胀患者颅内压监测及意义[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2013, 29(2): 146-149.
[7]
靳世辉,康承湘,叶友忠.急性脑膨出预防模式在幕上重型颅脑外伤治疗中的应用及脑膨出危险因素分析[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2019, 5(4): 206-209.
[8]
何建青,王玉海,张春雷,等.颅脑损伤开颅术中急性脑膨出预后影响因素分析(附168例报告)[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2015, 31(4): 362-364.
[9]
沈通桃,傅诚章.术中低血压对手术患者重要器官功能和预后的影响[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2017, 38(8): 741-746.
[10]
Lonjaret L, Lairez O, Minville V, et al. Optimal perioperative management of arterial blood pressure[J]. Integr Blood Press Control, 2014, 7: 49-59.
[11]
Sun LY, Wijeysundera DN, Tait GA, et al. Association of intraoperative hypotension with acute kidney injury after elective noncardiac surgery[J]. Anesthesiology, 2015, 123(3): 515-523.
[12]
金保哲,张新中,周文科,等.重型颅脑创伤开颅术中急性脑膨出原因分析与对策[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2014, 30(3): 242-244.
[13]
秦德广,黄文勇,邓略初,等.颅内压监测下控制性减压在去骨瓣减压术中的应用[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2015, 31(5): 499-500.
[14]
费振海,阳建国,钟兴明,等.颅内压监测下控制性减压在开颅血肿清除术治疗重症脑出血患者中的应用价值研究[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2019, 18(5): 494-500.
[15]
Stocchetti N, Carbonara M, Citerio G, et al. Severe traumatic brain injury: targeted management in the intensive care unit[J]. Lancet Neural, 2017, 16(6): 452-464.
[16]
孙瑾,张俊卿,黄延林,等.外伤后急性弥漫性脑肿胀术中急性脑膨出相关危险因素分析[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2016, 2(4): 215-219.
[17]
杜春雷,刘连松,平海江,等.梯度减压防治颅脑创伤开颅术中恶性脑膨出[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2014, 30(3): 260-262.
[18]
阳建国,钟兴明.颅内压监测下控制性减压在软通道穿刺引流术治疗长期服用阿司匹林的高血压脑出血中的应用研究[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2018, 17(5): 507-511.
[19]
Tamaki T, Node Y, Yamamoto Y, et al. Cardiopulmonary hemodynamic changes during acute subdural hematoma evacuation[J]. Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo), 2006, 46(5): 219-224; discussion 224-225.
[20]
王玉海,杨理坤,蔡学见,等.控制减压治疗重型、特重型颅脑伤[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2010, 26(9): 819-822.
[21]
张泽立,刘文明,张源,等.急性脑膨出预防策略对重型颅脑外伤救治的效果分析[J].中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(31): 2435-2438.
[22]
庄强,曲春城,梁文芝,等.重症颅脑损伤术中急性脑膨出21例临床分析[J].中华医学杂志, 2011, 91(9): 608-611.
[1] 王守森, 黄银兴, 陈宇晖, 胡晓芳, 刘海兵. 重型颅脑损伤的外科救治策略[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 190-192.
[2] 汤宏, 高灵, 高宁, 蒋俊文, 张吉坤, 李由, 陈伟明, 夏鹰. 控制性减压在治疗重型颅脑损伤中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 91-96.
[3] 朱敏, 李法强. CD64指数联合降钙素原、白介素-6、血清淀粉样蛋白A检测对重型颅脑损伤术后颅内细菌感染的诊断价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 26-31.
[4] 张付意, 侯现增, 汪建军, 辛涛. 有创颅内压监测靶向管控在重型颅脑损伤患者围术期应用价值分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 298-301.
[5] 王忠, 张瑞剑, 韩志桐, 王俊青, 吴日乐, 赵卫平, 张晓军, 包金岗, 杨姝敏, 杨蔚然, 张之龙. 局部脑氧饱和度监测目标导向治疗在重型颅脑损伤中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 293-297.
[6] 吕学明, 赵振宇, 初晨宇, 孙新同, 张永强, 袁绍纪, 吕福林. 应急状态下早期去骨瓣减压治疗重型颅脑损伤时间窗的初步研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 92-95.
[7] 魏宜功, 周焜, 陈光唐, 王诚, 刘窗溪. 颅内压监测下改良阶梯减压法结合去骨瓣减压治疗颅内高压的疗效分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(01): 28-33.
[8] 管诚, 沈剑虹, 管义祥, 陈建静. 标准大骨瓣减压结合腰大池持续引流术对重型颅脑损伤的疗效与预后的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(05): 281-287.
[9] 吴霜, 李三中, 武秀权, 郇宇, 何鑫, 孙季冬, 杜伟, 蒋晓帆, 费舟, 林伟. 重型颅脑损伤合并肺部感染单中心临床分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 141-145.
[10] 何鑫, 贺亚龙, 武秀权, 吴霜, 郇宇, 王凯, 杜伟, 费舟, 李侠. 成年重型颅脑损伤后加重继发性脑损伤的危险因素分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 132-136.
[11] 黄银兴, 刘峥, 陈其钻, 张尚明, 田君, 薛亮, 王守森. 显微外科手术治疗复杂性脑挫裂伤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 21-24.
[12] 陈晨, 徐宏, 李政, 韩杨云. 脑室内颅内压监测在重型颅脑损伤患者围术期的应用研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 146-151.
[13] 张华, 刘广明. 重型颅脑损伤患者术后脑膨出的影响因素及风险预测模型的构建[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(02): 96-102.
[14] 高国一. 重症颅脑损伤患者肠源性感染与肠内营养[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 63-64.
[15] 刘健, 韦晓旭, 李庆友, 黄明将. 血栓弹力图R值在重型颅脑损伤并发MODS中的作用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 680-684.
阅读次数
全文


摘要