切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 92 -95. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2022.02.006

临床研究

应急状态下早期去骨瓣减压治疗重型颅脑损伤时间窗的初步研究
吕学明1, 赵振宇1,(), 初晨宇1, 孙新同1, 张永强1, 袁绍纪1, 吕福林1   
  1. 1. 250031 济南,解放军第九六〇医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-10 出版日期:2022-04-15
  • 通信作者: 赵振宇
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81400919); 院长基金(2017ZX04)

Preliminary study on the time window of early decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury

Xueming Lyu1, Zhenyu Zhao1,(), Chenyu Chu1, Xintong Sun1, Yongqiang Zhang1, Shaoji Yuan1, Fulin Lyu1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, 960th Hospital of Chinese PLA, Ji’nan 250031, China
  • Received:2020-12-10 Published:2022-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhenyu Zhao
引用本文:

吕学明, 赵振宇, 初晨宇, 孙新同, 张永强, 袁绍纪, 吕福林. 应急状态下早期去骨瓣减压治疗重型颅脑损伤时间窗的初步研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 92-95.

Xueming Lyu, Zhenyu Zhao, Chenyu Chu, Xintong Sun, Yongqiang Zhang, Shaoji Yuan, Fulin Lyu. Preliminary study on the time window of early decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(02): 92-95.

目的

探讨模拟应急状态下野战医院实施早期去骨瓣减压术(EDC)的可行性和可靠性。

方法

单中心回顾性队列研究解放军第九六〇医院神经外科自2016年1月至2019年9月收治的40例重型颅脑损伤(sTBI)患者,按照手术时机的不同将患者分为EDC组和去骨瓣减压术(DC)组,比较2组患者的手术时间窗、术中输血量、伤后24 h内脑挫裂伤进展性发展形成血肿、术后出现脑疝时间窗、术后达到安全后送的生命体征稳定时间窗等指标。

结果

EDC组的手术时长短于DC组,术中输血量少于DC组,24 h内进展性脑挫裂、脑疝发生率小于DC组,脑疝发生时间窗长于DC组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者的术后生命体征稳定时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

EDC是应急状态下野战医疗所治疗sTBI有效的手术方式。

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and reliability of early decompressive craniectomy (EDC) in field hospitals under simulated emergency state.

Methods

A single center retrospective cohort study was conducted in 40 patients with severe and extremely severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) admitted to the Neurosurgery Department of the 960th Hospital of Chinese PLA from January 2016 to September 2019. They were divided into EDC group and decompressive craniectomy (DC) group according to the operation time. The operation time window, the amount of intraoperative blood transfusion, brain contusion and laceration progressed to form a hematoma within 24 h after injury, the time window of postoperative cerebral hernia and the stable time window of vital signs after safe evacuation were compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time of EDC group was shorter than that of DC group, the amount of intraoperative blood transfusion was less than that of DC group, the incidence of progressive cerebral contusion and cerebral hernia within 24 h was less than that of DC group, and the time window of cerebral hernia was longer than that of DC group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the stability time of postoperative vital signs between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

EDC is an effective surgical method for sTBI in field medical station under emergency state.

表1 2组患者的临床资料对比
表2 2组患者去骨瓣减压术参数对比
图1 应急状态下五级救治颅脑损伤程序图
[1]
Blackbourne LH, Baer DG, Eastridge BJ, et al. Military medical revolution: military trauma system[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2012, 73(6 Suppl 5): S388-S394.
[2]
Strauss-Riggs K, Yeskey K, Miller A, et al. Translating battlefield practices to disaster health[J]. Disaster Med Public Health Prep, 2017, 11(4): 510-511.
[3]
胡东伟.不同减压术联合渐进式减压对重型颅脑损伤预后的影响[J].医学理论与实践, 2020, 33(20): 3371-3372.
[4]
徐桂兴,刘华,于萍,等.急性神经重症患者7天内进展为脑死亡的预测评分[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 6(2): 81-85.
[5]
何乾,张银善,刘静.标准外伤大骨瓣开颅手术对颅脑损伤患者的疗效分析[J].解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(2): 126-127.
[6]
李长芹,李培进,朴淳一.美军战时卫勤信息化建设研究进展[J].人民军医, 2009, 52(9): 569-570.
[7]
王学标.美军战场伤员的救护模式[J].解放军健康, 2004, (3): 9.
[8]
梁华平,王正国.俄军卫勤保障的分级救治体系及医疗后送装备[C].//第九届全军战创伤外科专业学术会议会议论文集.南昌:第三军医大学野战外科研究所, 2005: 20-23.
[9]
周巍,王敏.俄军卫勤保障2020年前发展规划简介[J].人民军医, 2014, 57(9): 964-965.
[10]
Jenkins DH, Cioffi WG, Cocanour CS, et al. Position statement of the coalition for national trauma research on the national academies of sciences, engineering and medicine report, a national trauma care system: integrating military and civilian trauma systems to achieve zero preventable deaths after injury[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2016, 81(5): 816-818.
[11]
A national trauma care system: integrating military and civilian trauma systems to achieve zero preventable deaths after injury[J]. Mil Med, 2017, 182(5): 1563-1565.
[12]
Berwick DM, Downey AS, Cornett EA. A national trauma care system to achieve zero preventable deaths after injury: recommendations from a national academies of sciences, engineering, and medicine report[J]. JAMA, 2016, 316(9): 927-928.
[13]
Jenkins DH, Winchell RJ, Coimbra R, et al. Position statement of the American college of surgeons committee on trauma on the national academies of sciences, engineering and medicine report, a national trauma care system: integrating military and civilian trauma systems to achieve zero preventable deaths after injury[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2016, 81(5): 819-823.
[14]
Maegele M, Schöchl H, Menovsky T, et al. Coagulopathy and haemorrhagic progression in traumatic brain injury: advances in mechanisms, diagnosis, and management[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2017, 16(8): 630-647.
[15]
Butler FK Jr, Blackbourne LH. Battlefield trauma care then and now: a decade of tactical combat casualty care[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2012, 73(6 Suppl 5): S395-S402.
[1] 王守森, 黄银兴, 陈宇晖, 胡晓芳, 刘海兵. 重型颅脑损伤的外科救治策略[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 190-192.
[2] 汤宏, 高灵, 高宁, 蒋俊文, 张吉坤, 李由, 陈伟明, 夏鹰. 控制性减压在治疗重型颅脑损伤中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 91-96.
[3] 朱敏, 李法强. CD64指数联合降钙素原、白介素-6、血清淀粉样蛋白A检测对重型颅脑损伤术后颅内细菌感染的诊断价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 26-31.
[4] 张付意, 侯现增, 汪建军, 辛涛. 有创颅内压监测靶向管控在重型颅脑损伤患者围术期应用价值分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 298-301.
[5] 王忠, 张瑞剑, 韩志桐, 王俊青, 吴日乐, 赵卫平, 张晓军, 包金岗, 杨姝敏, 杨蔚然, 张之龙. 局部脑氧饱和度监测目标导向治疗在重型颅脑损伤中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 293-297.
[6] 管诚, 沈剑虹, 管义祥, 陈建静. 标准大骨瓣减压结合腰大池持续引流术对重型颅脑损伤的疗效与预后的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(05): 281-287.
[7] 吴霜, 李三中, 武秀权, 郇宇, 何鑫, 孙季冬, 杜伟, 蒋晓帆, 费舟, 林伟. 重型颅脑损伤合并肺部感染单中心临床分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 141-145.
[8] 何鑫, 贺亚龙, 武秀权, 吴霜, 郇宇, 王凯, 杜伟, 费舟, 李侠. 成年重型颅脑损伤后加重继发性脑损伤的危险因素分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 132-136.
[9] 黄银兴, 刘峥, 陈其钻, 张尚明, 田君, 薛亮, 王守森. 显微外科手术治疗复杂性脑挫裂伤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 21-24.
[10] 薛亮, 汪熙臻, 陈业煌, 张辉建, 魏梁锋, 王守森. 正中神经电刺激对NICU重型颅脑损伤昏迷促醒的临床研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 17-20.
[11] 阳建国, 钟兴明, 吴利平. 颅内压监测下控制性减压联合预缝式关颅在重型颅脑损伤手术中的作用探讨[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 06(05): 265-269.
[12] 陈晨, 徐宏, 李政, 韩杨云. 脑室内颅内压监测在重型颅脑损伤患者围术期的应用研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 146-151.
[13] 张华, 刘广明. 重型颅脑损伤患者术后脑膨出的影响因素及风险预测模型的构建[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(02): 96-102.
[14] 高国一. 重症颅脑损伤患者肠源性感染与肠内营养[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 63-64.
[15] 刘健, 韦晓旭, 李庆友, 黄明将. 血栓弹力图R值在重型颅脑损伤并发MODS中的作用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 680-684.
阅读次数
全文


摘要