切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 87 -91. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2022.02.005

临床研究

脑干听觉诱发电位在面肌痉挛显微血管减压术中的应用价值
任鸿翔1, 张黎1, 张瑜廉1, 刘学来1, 于炎冰1,()   
  1. 1. 100029 北京,中日友好医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-26 出版日期:2022-04-15
  • 通信作者: 于炎冰

Application value of brainstem auditory evoked potential in microvascular decompression of facial spasm

Hongxiang Ren1, Li Zhang1, Yulian Zhang1, Xuelai Liu1, Yanbing Yu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, China Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2021-10-26 Published:2022-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Yanbing Yu
引用本文:

任鸿翔, 张黎, 张瑜廉, 刘学来, 于炎冰. 脑干听觉诱发电位在面肌痉挛显微血管减压术中的应用价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 87-91.

Hongxiang Ren, Li Zhang, Yulian Zhang, Xuelai Liu, Yanbing Yu. Application value of brainstem auditory evoked potential in microvascular decompression of facial spasm[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(02): 87-91.

目的

探讨脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEPs)V波潜伏期和(或)波幅的变化与面肌痉挛(HFS)显微血管减压术(MVD)后听力损失的应用价值。

方法

选取中日友好医院神经外科自2015年9月至2019年8月行MVD治疗的HFS患者的临床资料,分析MVD始末BAEPs的V波潜伏期和波幅的变化以及手术前后听力状况的改变,听力学评估采用平均纯音听力阈值及言语识别率改变。根据美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会分级方法,将术后患者听力分为听力未明显下降组和听力明显下降组。收集术中全程的BAEPs改变,并将BAEPs的V波术中改变分为:无显著异常,单纯V波潜伏期(LwV)延长>1.5 ms,单纯V波波幅(AwV)下降>50%,LwV延长>1.5 ms且AwV下降>50%,LwV延长>1.5 ms或AwV下降>50%,对5组分类模式下术后听力损伤程度与分组的相关性进行统计分析,并分析4组BAEPs改变对术后听力损伤的预测价值。

结果

本研究纳入的1009例行MVD治疗的HFS患者中,943例患者听力未明显下降,66例患者术后听力异常,术中BAEPs监测波形无显著改变,术后出现听力下降5例(0.6%);术中仅LwV延长>1.5 ms,术后出现听力下降4例(18.2%);术中仅AwV降低>50%,术后出现听力下降19例(25.0%);术中"LwV延长>1.5 ms且AwV降低>50%",术后出现听力下降38例(64.4%);术中"LwV延长>1.5 ms或AwV降低>50%",术后出现听力下降61例(38.8%)。各组的阳性预测值比较,结果显示"LwV延长>1.5 ms且AwV降低>50%"最高;"LwV延长>1.5 ms或AwV下降>50%"组的敏感度最高;"LwV延长>1.5 ms且AwV下降>50%"组的特异度最强。

结论

术中BAEPs监测可为MVD术者提供听力参考。术末V波潜伏期延长1.5 ms且波幅降低50%以上阳性预测值最高。术中根据BAEPs监测结果及时调整手术策略,可有效改善术后听力障碍的发生率。

Objective

To investigate the correlation between changes in brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) Ⅴ wave latency and (or) amplitude and hearing loss (HL) after hemifacial spasm (HFS) microvascular decompression (MVD).

Methods

The clinical data of HFS patients treated with MVD in Neurosurgery Department of China-Japan Friendship Hospital from September 2015 to August 2019 were selected to analyze the changes of V-wave latency and amplitude of BAEPs before and after MVD as well as the changes of hearing status before and after MVD. Audiology was evaluated by mean pure tone hearing threshold and speech recognition rate changes. According to the AAO-HNS grading method, the postoperative patients' hearing was divided into non significant HL group and significant HL group. BAEPs changes in the whole intraoperative process were collected, and V-wave intraoperative changes of BAEPs were divided into: no significant abnormality, simple V wave latency (LwV) prolonged >1.5 ms, simple V wave amplitude (AwV) decreased >50%, prolonged >1.5 ms and AwV decreased >50%, LwV prolonged >1.5 ms or AwV decreased >50%. The correlation between the degree of postoperative hearing injury and grouping under the five group classification mode was statistically analyzed, and the predictive value of BAEPs changes on postoperative HL in the four groups was statistically analyzed.

Results

Among 1009 HFS patients who underwent MVD, 943 patients had no significant HL, 66 patients had abnormal hearing after surgery, the waveforms of BAEPs monitoring had no significant change during surgery, and 5 patients (0.6%) had HL after surgery. Intraoperative LwV was prolonged >1.5 ms, and 4 cases (18.2%) had postoperative HL. Intraoperative AwV decreased by more than 50%, and postoperative HL occurred in 19 cases (25.0%). Intraoperative LwV prolonged >1.5 ms and AwV decreased >50%, and postoperative HL occurred in 38 cases (64.4%). Intraoperative LwV prolonged >1.5 ms or AwV decreased >50%, and postoperative HL occurred in 61 cases (38.8%). In addition, positive predictive value of each group was compared. The results showed that "1.5 ms extension of LwV and over 50% reduction of AwV" was the highest. The group "intraoperativLewV prolonged >1.5 ms and AwV decreased >50%" had the highest sensitivity. The group "1.5 ms extension of LwV and over 50% reduction of AwV" had the most strong specificity

Conclusion

Intraoperative BAEPs monitoring can provide reference for MVD patients. The positive prediction of V-wave latency prolonged by 1.5 ms and wave amplitude decreased by more than 50% at the end of operation was the highest among the four groups. In addition, timely adjustment of surgical strategies according to BAEPs monitoring results during surgery can effectively improve the incidence of postoperative hearing impairment.

表1 2组面肌痉挛患者临床资料对比
图1 不同听力监测波形变化的受试者工作特征曲线图LwV:V波潜伏期;AwV:V波波幅
表2 患者术中听力监测波形变化和术后听力下降的预测价值分析
[1]
Raudzens PA, Shetter AG. Intraoperative monitoring of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials[J]. J Neurosurg, 1982, 57(3): 341-348.
[2]
Møller MB, Møller AR. Loss of auditory function in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Results in 143 consecutive cases[J]. J Neurosurg, 1985, 63(1): 17-20.
[3]
Polo G, Fischer C, Sindou MP, et al. Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes and warning values to prevent hearing loss--prospective study in a consecutive series of 84 patients[J]. Neurosurgery, 2004, 54(1): 97-104; discussion 104-106.
[4]
Thirumala PD, Carnovale G, Loke Y, et al. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials' diagnostic accuracy for hearing loss: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base, 2017, 78(1): 43-51.
[5]
Park SK, Joo BE, Lee S, et al. The critical warning sign of real-time brainstem auditory evoked potentials during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2018, 129(5): 1097-1102.
[6]
Hatayama T, Møller AR. Correlation between latency and amplitude of peak V in the brainstem auditory evoked potentials: intraoperative recordings in microvascular decompression operations[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 1998, 140(7): 681-687.
[7]
Thirumala PD, Krishnaiah B, Habeych ME, et al. Hearing outcomes after loss of brainstem auditory evoked potentials during microvascular decompression[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2015, 22(4): 659-663.
[8]
Jo KW, Kim JW, Kong DS, et al. The patterns and risk factors of hearing loss following microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2011, 153(5): 1023-1030.
[9]
Thirumala PD, Carnovale G, Habeych ME, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of brainstem auditory evoked potentials during microvascular decompression[J]. Neurology, 2014, 83(19): 1747-1752.
[10]
Legatt AD. Electrophysiology of cranial nerve testing: auditory nerve[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol, 2018, 35(1): 25-38.
[11]
Joo BE, Park SK, Cho KR, et al. Real-time intraoperative monitoring of brainstem auditory evoked potentials during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J]. J Neurosurg, 2016, 125(5): 1061-1067.
[12]
James ML, Husain AM. Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring: when is change in wave V significant?[J] Neurology, 2005, 65(10): 1551-1555.
[13]
Zhang Y, Ren H, Jia G, et al. Predictive values of maximum changes of brainstem auditory evoked potentials during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2020, 162(11): 2823-2832.
[14]
任鸿翔,张黎,姜伟浩,等.脑干听觉诱发电位联合耳蜗电图监测在显微血管减压术中的应用[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2021, 20(6): 571-577.
[15]
Sun DQ, Sullivan CB, Kung RW, et al. How well does intraoperative audiologic monitoring predict hearing outcome during middle fossa vestibular schwannoma resection?[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2018, 39(7): 908-915.
[1] 李强, 臧迪, 任鸿翔. 耳蜗电图与脑干听觉诱发电位的联合监测在桥小脑角胆脂瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 253-256.
[2] 张永明, 许少年, 赵鹏程, 姜国伟, 张圣帮, 丁俊, 钱峰. 神经电生理监测下显微血管减压术治疗左侧面肌痉挛[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 191-192.
[3] 任鸿翔, 张黎, 申宇晓, 任贵玲, 于炎冰. 桥小脑角区肿瘤继发颅神经疾患的临床特点及疗效研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 177-181.
[4] 贾戈, 任鸿翔, 张黎, 张瑜廉, 于炎冰. 面肌痉挛显微血管减压术中不同听力保护策略的疗效:一项随机对照研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 170-176.
[5] 种玉龙, 徐武, 王晶, 姜成荣, 梁维邦. 头颅CTA检查在微血管减压术前安全性评估中的临床意义[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 282-284.
[6] 王晶, 种玉龙, 姜成荣, 陆天宇, 戴宇翔, 梁维邦. 悬吊责任动脉技术治疗面肌痉挛的临床分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 277-281.
[7] 王柏嵊, 张黎, 于炎冰. 面肌痉挛病因学的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 246-248.
[8] 姜成荣, 徐武, 种玉龙, 王晶, 周璐, 梁维邦. 三叉神经痛显微血管减压术中岩静脉的分型及处理策略[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 200-203.
[9] 周小鸯, 钟兴明, 蔡勇, 沈丽娟. 脑干听觉诱发电位在颅脑损伤听力障碍患者快速康复中的意义[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(03): 159-163.
[10] 任鸿翔. 乙状窦后入路锁孔显微血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(03): 188-192.
[11] 阿布地热合曼·吐尔孙尼牙孜, 石鑫, 郝玉军, 姜磊, 买买提江·卡斯木, 冯兆海, 裴祎楠. 显微血管减压术治疗舌咽神经痛疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 74-78.
[12] 陈聪, 王昊, 杜垣锋, 王家栋, 江力, 王鼎, 沈永锋, 俞文华. 基于人工神经网络的多数据分析预测三叉神经痛患者MVD术后长期疗效[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(02): 68-73.
[13] 乔育, 李加龙, 孙帅, 于蓬勃, 马胜利, 张陇平, 王晓峰. 显微血管减压神经移位技术治疗三叉神经痛术中静脉压迫4例报道[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 61-62.
[14] 李加昆, 雒仁玺, 徐将荣, 汪艳龙, 庆晓东, 林松, 刘岩. 全内镜枕下锁孔入路血管减压术治疗面肌痉挛的体会[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 284-286.
[15] 苏明明, 王景, 汪鑫, 李嘉明, 郑朝辉, 王学廉, 屈延, 高国栋. 静脉压迫导致三叉神经痛的影像学评估及显微血管减压术治疗[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(05): 280-283.
阅读次数
全文


摘要