切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 115 -120. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2021.02.012

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

临床研究

脊髓电刺激对慢性意识障碍患者脑电成分的调控效应(24例报告)
夏小雨1, 王勇2, 白洋3, 杨艺4, 党圆圆1, 李小俚5, 何江弘4,()   
  1. 1. 100700 北京,解放军总医院第七医学中心神经外科
    2. 066004 秦皇岛,燕山大学电气工程学院
    3. 311121 杭州,杭州师范大学医学院基础医学系
    4. 100070 北京,首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经外科
    5. 100875 北京,北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-22 出版日期:2021-04-15
  • 通信作者: 何江弘
  • 基金资助:
    首都特色基金资助项目(Z171100001017162); 国家自然科学基金(81771128)

Analysis of the effects of spinal cord stimulation frequency on EEG regulation in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness (report of 24 cases)

Xiaoyu Xia1, Yong Wang2, Yang Bai3, Yi Yang4, Yuanyuan Dang1, Xiaoli Li5, Jianghong He4,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, The Seventh Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
    2. School of Electrical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China
    3. Department of Basic Medicine, College of Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
    4. Department of Neurosurgery, Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
    5. State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2020-05-22 Published:2021-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Jianghong He
引用本文:

夏小雨, 王勇, 白洋, 杨艺, 党圆圆, 李小俚, 何江弘. 脊髓电刺激对慢性意识障碍患者脑电成分的调控效应(24例报告)[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 115-120.

Xiaoyu Xia, Yong Wang, Yang Bai, Yi Yang, Yuanyuan Dang, Xiaoli Li, Jianghong He. Analysis of the effects of spinal cord stimulation frequency on EEG regulation in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness (report of 24 cases)[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(02): 115-120.

目的

研究脊髓电刺激(SCS)不同频率对慢性意识障碍(DOC)患者皮层脑电的调控效应,建立基于量化评价下的SCS刺激范式。

方法

纳入解放军总医院第七医学中心神经外科自2016年5月至2017年9月行SCS手术的24例慢性DOC患者,采用不同频率程控参数,记录刺激前与刺激后脑电图,使用频谱分析方法,提取额叶区域脑电不同频段的能量,比较其在不同刺激条件下的特征,并将脑电频谱变化与基线意识水平[分为微意识状态(MCS)组和植物状态(VS)组]、临床随访恢复情况(按照术后3个月随访时情况分为显效、有效、无效3组)做相关性分析。

结果

不同的SCS频率给患者的皮层脑电带来了不同的改变,且存在明显的个体差异性。从个体水平上观察,引起较明显积极脑电调控效应的频率为5 Hz(10/24)和70 Hz(10/24),比例超过其他频率刺激[20 Hz(5/24),50 Hz(3/24),100 Hz(4/24)]。MCS组相对VS组在SCS刺激下可产生更大的脑电频谱变化且在γ频段的差异具有统计学意义,但并未发现各频段脑电频谱变化值与临床随访恢复情况的相关性。

结论

低频刺激(如5 Hz)或高频刺激(如70 Hz)都能对慢性DOC患者脑电产生积极改变,其中5 Hz和70 Hz频率可作为临床刺激方案的优先选择。

Objective

To study the effects of different frequencies of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on cortical electroencephalogram in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness (DOC), and establish a SCS stimulation paradigm based on quantitative evaluation.

Methods

Twenty-four patients with chronic DOC who underwent SCS in the Department of Neurosurgery, the Seventh Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital were treated with different frequency programmed parameters to record pre- and post-stimulation electroencephalogram. Spectrum analysis was used to extract the energy of different electroencephalogram bands in the frontal lobe region, and to compare their characteristics under different stimulation conditions. Correlation analysis was made between changes in brain electrical spectrum and baseline consciousness level [divided into 2 groups, minimally consciousness state (MCS) and vegetative state (VS)] and clinical follow-up recovery level (divided into 3 groups: markedly effective, effective and ineffective according to the situation during the 3-month follow-up after operation).

Results

Different SCS frequencies brought different changes to the patient’s cortical electroencephalogram, and there were significant individual differences. Observed at the individual level, the frequencies that cause more obvious positive electroencephalogram regulation effects are 5 Hz (10/24) and 70 Hz (10/24). The positive ratio exceeds other frequency stimuli (20 Hz 5/24, 50 Hz 3/24, 100 Hz 4/24). Compared with the VS group, the MCS group produced a larger electroencephalogram spectrum change under SCS stimulation and the difference in the γ frequency band was statistically significant. However, the correlation between the electroencephalogram spectrum changes in each frequency band and the recovery of clinical follow-up was not found.

Conclusion

Low-frequency stimulation (such as 5 Hz), or high-frequency stimulation (such as 70 Hz) can positively change the brain electrical power of chronic DOC patients, and the two specific frequencies of 5 Hz and 70 Hz should be the preferred choice for clinical stimulation.

图1 脑电电极分布及功率谱计算纳入的额叶电极位置示意
图2 某患者5 Hz脊髓电刺激前后功率谱地形图
图3 慢性DOC脑电频谱变化的基线意识水平组间对比
图4 脑电频谱变化的不同预后组间对比
[1]
Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Laureys S, et al. Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2014, 10(2): 99-114.
[2]
Yamamoto T, Katayama Y, Obuchi T, et al. Deep brain stimulation and spinal cord stimulation for vegetative state and minimally conscious state[J]. World Neurosurg, 2013, 80(3-4): S30.e1-e9.
[3]
Xia X, Yang Y, Guo Y, et al. Current status of neuromodulatory therapies for disorders of consciousness[J]. Neurosci Bull, 2018, 34(4): 615-625.
[4]
夏小雨,黄永志,白洋,等.脊髓电刺激频率对意识障碍患者脑电的影响(附四例报告)[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2016, 32(6): 566-568.
[5]
Bai Y, Xia X, Li X, et al. Spinal cord stimulation modulates frontal delta and gamma in patients of minimally consciousness state[J]. Neuroscience, 2017, 346: 247-254.
[6]
Bai Y, Xia X, Liang Z, et al. Frontal connectivity in EEG gamma (30-45 Hz) respond to spinal cord stimulation in minimally conscious state patients[J]. Front Cell Neurosci, 2017, 11: 177.
[7]
Lehembre R, Gosseries O, Lugo Z, et al. Electrophysiological investigations of brain function in coma, vegetative and minimally conscious patients[J]. Arch Ital Biol, 2012, 150(2-3): 122-139.
[8]
Ragazzoni A, Pirulli C, Veniero D, et al. Vegetative versus minimally conscious states: a study using TMS-EEG, sensory and event-related potentials[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(2): e57069.
[9]
Gottshall JL, Adams ZM, Forgacs PB, et al. Daytime central thalamic deep brain stimulation modulates sleep dynamics in the severely injured brain: mechanistic insights and a novel framework for alpha-delta sleep generation[J]. Front Neurol, 2019, 10: 20.
[10]
Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK coma recovery scale-revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004, 85(12): 2020-2029.
[11]
Angelakis E, Liouta E, Andreadis N, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation effects in disorders of consciousness[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2014, 95(2): 283-289.
[12]
Rosanova M, Gosseries O, Casarotto S, et al. Recovery of cortical effective connectivity and recovery of consciousness in vegetative patients[J]. Brain, 2012, 135(4): 1308-1320.
[13]
Lehembre R, Marie-Aurelie B, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Resting-state EEG study of comatose patients: a connectivity and frequency analysis to find differences between vegetative and minimally conscious states[J]. Funct Neurol, 2012, 27(1): 41-47.
[14]
Sitt JD, King JR, El Karoui I, et al. Large scale screening of neural signatures of consciousness in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state[J]. Brain, 2014, 137(Pt 8): 2258-2270.
[15]
Kanno T, Morita I, Yamaguchi S, et al. Dorsal column stimulation in persistent vegetative state[J]. Neuromodulation, 2009, 12(1): 33-38.
[16]
何江弘,杨艺,焦辉,等.持续性植物状态的神经调控治疗[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2013, 12(12): 1197-1200.
[1] 李文琳, 羊玲, 邢凯慧, 陈彩华, 钟丽花, 张娅琴, 张薇. 脐动脉血血气分析联合振幅整合脑电图对新生儿窒息脑损伤的早期诊断价值分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 550-558.
[2] 张永明. 颈段脊髓电刺激治疗颅脑损伤后慢性意识障碍的进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 129-134.
[3] 冀京雷, 李秀丽, 贾亚男, 冯会敏, 刘丽艳. 改良aEEG评分评估高危足月低体质量新生儿脑损伤的效果分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 165-169.
[4] 李青华, 靳晨彦, 王艳军, 庄禹童, 何江弘, 郭文治. 七氟醚与丙泊酚对慢性意识障碍患者全身麻醉期间脑电的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 12-18.
[5] 魏微, 何江弘, 黄勇华, 司娟宁. 脑成像技术在意识障碍患者脑功能评估中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 117-120.
[6] 刘安民, 曹宁, 谢佳芯, 封亚平. 多模态影像学技术在意识障碍诊疗中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(04): 216-219.
[7] 吴新高, 李伟, 马俊, 刘红, 黄平. 癫痫患者定量脑电图功率谱相关参数与认知功能损伤的相关性研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 304-308.
[8] 杨新宇, 彭建文, 李辉萍, 陶希, 方翠霓, 宋涛. 脑电非线性分析在卒中后意识障碍的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 185-190.
[9] 梁玉兰, 陈亮, 曾令梅. NLR、RDW水平联合振幅整合脑电图在缺氧缺血性脑病患儿的预后研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 84-89.
[10] 丁浩然, 关宇光, 王雄飞, 赵萌, 王静, 王梦阳, 滕鹏飞, 栾国明. 立体定向脑电图引导下多电极立体适形射频热凝毁损治疗药物难治性岛叶癫痫的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 227-233.
[11] 沈伶俐, 刘晓鸣, 李玮玮, 夏露, 周强. 自身免疫性脑炎患儿视频脑电图监测期间基于共享信息系统的协同干预模式的作用分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 162-166.
[12] 李变, 王莉娜, 桑田, 李珊, 杜雪燕, 李春华, 张兴云, 管巧, 王颖, 冯琪, 蒙景雯. 亚低温技术治疗缺氧缺血性脑病新生儿的临床分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 639-643.
[13] 王增成, 葛敏, 赵惠君, 袁学伟, 王丽琴. 监测窒息新生儿血清BDNF、S100B及aEEG动态变化及对脑损伤预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 48-53.
[14] 贺晶, 史洁, 林久銮, 孙朝晖, 王海祥, 张冰清, 刘一鸥, 宋宪成, 丰倩, 柏建军, 周文静. 结节性硬化伴难治性癫痫儿童的手术治疗分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(08): 597-600.
[15] 冯韬, 卢超, 孟飞, 王逸鹤, 张华强, 魏鹏虎, 单永治, 赵国光. 立体定向脑电图在儿童致痫性下丘脑错构瘤中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(08): 584-590.
阅读次数
全文


摘要