切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (01) : 16 -19. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2018.01.005

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

创伤性脑损伤术后并发脑积水的临床经验总结
胡世颉1, 李兵1, 费舟1,()   
  1. 1. 710032 西安,空军军医大学西京医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-22 出版日期:2018-02-15
  • 通信作者: 费舟
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81101710); 陕西省社会发展科技攻关项目(2015SF030); 陕西省国际科技合作与交流计划项目(2016KW-011)

Clinical experience on hydrocephalus after surgery of traumatic brain injury

Shijie Hu1, Bing Li1, Zhou Fei1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
  • Received:2017-11-22 Published:2018-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhou Fei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fei Zhou, Email:
引用本文:

胡世颉, 李兵, 费舟. 创伤性脑损伤术后并发脑积水的临床经验总结[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(01): 16-19.

Shijie Hu, Bing Li, Zhou Fei. Clinical experience on hydrocephalus after surgery of traumatic brain injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(01): 16-19.

目的

分析总结创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者术后并发脑积水的高危因素和治疗体会,为降低TBI术后并发脑积水的发生率以及改善治疗效果提供理论依据。

方法

选取空军军医大学西京医院神经外科重症监护室自2014年1月至2016年12月收治的TBI行标准去骨瓣减压术治疗的126例患者作为研究对象,对全部患者进行至少6个月随访,发生脑积水患者纳入脑积水组,未发生脑积水患者纳入对照组,回顾性分析术后脑积水发生率,比较分析TBI术后患者脑积水发生相关的高危因素,并观察脑室-腹腔分流术(VPS)对TBI并发脑积水患者的治疗效果。

结果

126例患者中23例发生脑积水,并发脑积水时间为伤后1~10周。与对照组相比,脑积水组患者术前GCS评分较低(t=8.235,P<0.05),急性生理学与慢性健康评分系统Ⅱ评分较低(t=10.573,P<0.05),差异具有统计学意义。2组在年龄、昏迷时间、血肿部位(硬膜下、脑内)、蛛网膜下腔出血、脑室出血、中线偏移≥10 mm情况有着明显的不同,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。脑积水组患者行VPS治疗,28 d内恢复清醒状态,体温正常,无语言障碍。

结论

临床应为TBI患者术前进行术后并发脑积水高危因素的评估,预防脑积水的发生;若已发生,则可通过使用VPS来缓解患者的病情。

Objective

To analyze and summarize the high risk factors of hydrocephalus after surgery of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and therapeutic experiences, and to provide theoretical basis for the prevention of postoperative hydrocephalus.

Methods

To enroll 126 cases of TBI patients with standard decompressive craniectomy and follow up at least with 6 months about the complication rate of hydrocephalus. The related clinical characteristics were compared and the therapeutic results were observed after ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VPS).

Results

Age, time of coma, lower GCS and high APACHEⅡscore when admission, location of hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, lumbar puncture, intra-operative dura suture and midline shift more than 10 mm were the high risk factors of hydrocephalus after standard decompressive craniectomy of TBI patients. There were significant differences in these factors between hydrocephalus group and control group. After VPS was applied to treat the hydrocephalus patients, the patients recovered well in 30 d with normal temperature and without language dysfunction.

Conclusion

The high risk factors should be evaluated before the surgery of patients with TBI to prevent the complication of hydrocephalus. If there were, VPS is a suitable choice for the treatment.

表1 创伤性脑损伤患者开颅术前GCS和APACHEⅡ评分比较
表2 2组不同临床指标比较
表3 2组TBI术后患者疗效比较(±s
[1]
Ahmed S,Venigalla H,Mekala HM, et al. Traumatic Brain Injury and Neuropsychiatric Complications[J]. Indian J Psychol Med, 2017, 39(2): 114-121.
[2]
Carney N,Totten AM,O'Reilly C, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain Injury, fourth edition[J]. Neurosurgery, 2017, 80(1): 6-15.
[3]
江基尧,朱诚,罗其中.颅脑创伤救治指南[M].第3版.上海: 第二军医大学出版社, 2007: 222.
[4]
王雷平,吴崇光,姚军.颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术后并发创伤后脑积水的危险因素[J].中华创伤杂志, 2014, 30(4): 307-310.
[5]
周良辅.负压和低压性脑积水[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2016, 2(6): 321-327.
[6]
方黎晓,胡少玄,徐洪飞,等.侧脑室-腹腔分流术治疗外伤性脑积水术后并发症临床观察[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2016, 2(1): 23-25.
[7]
Davanzo JR,Sieg EP,Timmons SD. Management of traumatic brain injury[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2017, 97(6): 1237-1253.
[8]
Grandhi R,Bonfield CM,Newman WC, et al. Surgical management of traumatic brain injury: a review of guidelines, pathophysiology, neurophysiology, outcomes, and controversies[J]. J Neurosurg Sci, 2014, 58(4): 249-259.
[9]
Qvarlander S,Malm J,Eklund A. CSF dynamic analysis of a predictive pulsatility-based infusion test for normal pressure hydrocephalus[J]. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2014, 52(1): 75-85.
[10]
Vedantam A,Yamal JM,Hwang H, et al. Factors associated with shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury[J]. J Neurosurg, 2017, Epub ahead of print.
[11]
张寅,江毓敏,李永财.重型创伤性脑损伤患者发生脑积水的危险因素分析[J].宁夏医科大学学报, 2017, 39(2): 170-177.
[12]
Fotakopoulos G,Tsianaka E,Siasios G, et al. Posttraumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy in 126 patients with severe traumatic brain injury[J]. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg, 2016, 77(2): 88-92.
[13]
车彦军,夏智源,骆杰民,等.颅脑损伤后慢性脑积水和脑室扩张的危险因素及治疗策[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2014, 17(22): 5-8.
[14]
Lee CN,Koh YC,Moon CT, et al. Serial mini-mental status examination to evaluate cognitive outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury[J]. Korean J Neurotrauma, 2015, 11(1): 6-10.
[15]
Korley FK,Diaz-Arrastia R,Wu AH, et al. Circulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor has diagnostic and prognostic value in traumatic brain injury[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2016, 33(2): 215-225.
[16]
叶建华.重型颅脑损伤患者并发脑积水的相关因素分析[J].实用医院临床杂志, 2014, 11(3): 83-85.
[17]
Kawoos U,Meng X,Huang SM, et al. Telemetric intracranial pressure monitoring in blast-induced traumatic brain injury[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2014, 61(3): 841-847.
[18]
Kim H,Lee HS,Ahn SY, et al. Factors associated postoperative hydrocephalus in patients with traumatic acute subdural Hemorrhage[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2017, 60(6): 730-737.
[19]
Yan EB,Satgunaseelan L,Paul E, et al. Post-traumatic hypoxia is associated with prolonged cerebral cytokine production, higher serum biomarker levels, and poor outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2014, 31(7): 618-629.
[20]
Kammersgaard LP,Linnemann M,Tibæk M. Hydrocephalus following severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Incidence, timing, and clinical predictors during rehabilitation[J]. NeuroRehabilitation, 2013, 33(3): 473-480.
[21]
黄国栋,李维平,黄贤键,等.神经内镜下和传统分流术治疗脑积水的疗效评价[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2010, 9(3): 308-311.
[1] 张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕. 北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[2] 王秀红, 李炳辉, 李军, 梅燕, 裴红兵, 龙飘, 张艳, 张文涛, 杜烨, 邝莉雯, 张晨晨, 李恭驰. 足病修复师足部综合干预在降低糖尿病足高危因素发生率中的作用[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(01): 53-58.
[3] 陈滔, 罗洪, 周进军. 老年食管癌单纯放疗及同期放化疗患者急性不良反应影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 405-407.
[4] 王晓丹, 王媛, 崔向宇, 任晓磊. 上尿路结石内镜手术后尿源性脓毒血症病原菌耐药及死亡高危因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-615.
[5] 王柠, 王佳伟, 刘旭阳. 重视眼颅压力差在多学科领域的应用[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 321-325.
[6] 阿迪莱·阿卜杜热西提, 费奥, 邢晓雯, 谢胜强, 张睿, 兰晓娟, 程岗. 三种模拟创伤性脑损伤体外细胞模型的损伤特征比较[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 69-75.
[7] 王建鹏, 廖勇仕, 丁文聪, 李冲, 陈锐. lncRNA在创伤性脑损伤中的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 365-370.
[8] 王奎重, 王天助, 袁冶, 胡金娜, 杜嘉庚, 袁绍纪. 三维重建术前计划在经侧脑室后角穿刺脑室-腹腔分流术中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 361-364.
[9] 赵海林, 王璐璐, 罗冬冬, 胡骕, 李丹, 彭彪. 脑室-腹腔分流术对脑膜转移癌的治疗效果分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 335-340.
[10] 崔刚, 王德亮, 付茂武, 田璧铭, 王莹, 段虎斌. 创伤性脑损伤后鼠脑内RHO/ROCK信号通路与神经炎症反应及病理性损伤关系的研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 324-328.
[11] 傅世龙, 王国锋, 侯鹏伟, 袁邦清, 魏梁锋, 王守森. 颅脑创伤患者术后再次开颅清除对侧血肿的影响因素分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 287-292.
[12] 吴晓凡, 罗书引, 冯二艳. 交通性脑积水脑室-腹腔分流术后迟发性颅内出血发生风险的列线图预测模型构建与评估[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 276-281.
[13] 胡霁云, 谢树才, 张丽娜. S100钙结合蛋白B与重症神经研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 298-303.
[14] 刘锦秀, 王晓伟, 张同乐, 姜爱华. 青年社会体检者、医务工作者及心肌梗死患者心血管疾病高危因素的对比研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 249-254.
[15] 彭涛, 陈东亮, 陈世兰, 谢庆海, 林正锋, 张伟光, 林通, 庞叶果, 覃后述, 劳景茂. 经脐旁改良单孔式腹腔镜技术在脑室—腹腔分流术中的临床研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(07): 657-660.
阅读次数
全文


摘要