切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (01) : 20 -23. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2018.01.006

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

临床研究

256例重型、特重型颅脑外伤后行大骨瓣减压术患者的回顾性分析
吕学明1,(), 王天助1, 李育鑫1, 袁绍纪1   
  1. 1. 250031 济南,济南军区总医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-30 出版日期:2018-02-15
  • 通信作者: 吕学明

Analysis of 256 cases of severe traumatic brain injury decompressive craniectomy case review

Xueming Lyu1,(), Tianzhu Wang1, Yuxin Li1, Shaoji Yuan1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Ji’nan General Hospital of PLA, Ji’nan 250031, China
  • Received:2017-09-30 Published:2018-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Xueming Lyu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lyu Xueming, Email:
引用本文:

吕学明, 王天助, 李育鑫, 袁绍纪. 256例重型、特重型颅脑外伤后行大骨瓣减压术患者的回顾性分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(01): 20-23.

Xueming Lyu, Tianzhu Wang, Yuxin Li, Shaoji Yuan. Analysis of 256 cases of severe traumatic brain injury decompressive craniectomy case review[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(01): 20-23.

目的

探讨256例重型、特重型颅脑外伤(TBI)患者行大骨瓣减压的远期治疗效果。

方法

单中心回顾性队列研究纳入自2012年7月至2016年12月济南军区总医院神经外科收治256例的因重型、特重型TBI急诊行大骨瓣减压的患者,其中重型(GCS评分6~8分)166例、特重型(GCS评分3~5分)90例,采用标准大骨瓣开颅术,减压窗面积约为12 cm×15 cm左右。术后随访18个月,预后分为良好恢复、中残、重残、植物状态、死亡;其中,良好恢复、中度病残为预后良好者,严重病残和植物状态为预后较差者。

结果

恢复良好/中残患者104例(40.61%),但其规范评估行为、心理表现与心理健康的负担未纳入此次临床评估。重残54例、植物状态38例、死亡60例,共计152例患者预后较差(59.37%),可判断59.37%的患者存在预后不良。

结论

标准外伤大骨瓣减压术是治疗重型TBI脑疝形成的有效方法。发生重型、特重型TBI的患者其临床预后差,表现为死亡、植物生存、功能损伤,需要医学界探索新的治疗策略。

Objective

Retrospective analysis of 256 cases of severe traumatic brain injury decompressive craniectomy (DC) were long-term clinical curative effect.

Methods

A single center retrospective cohort study included from July 2012 to December 2016 in our hospital 256 cases with severe craniocerebral trauma underwent DC in patients with severe (GCS score 6-8) in 166 cases, severe (GCS score 3-5) 90 cases, using standard big bone flap craniotomy decompression open. The window area is about 12 cm×15 cm. After 18 months of follow-up, the prognosis is divided into good recovery, moderate disability, severe disability, vegetative state and death; among them, good recovery, moderate disability for good prognosis, severe disability and poor prognosis for vegetative state.

Results

One hundred and four cases (40.61%) had basic self-care, but the standard evaluation behavior, psychological performance and mental health burden were not included in the clinical evaluation. Forty-eight cases of mild and moderate disability, 44 cases of severe disability, 20 cases of vegetative state, 40 cases of death, a total of 152 patients with poor prognosis (59.37%), 59.37% of the patients can be found to have poor prognosis.

Conclusion

DC is effective for treating severe traumatic brain injury as it could provide complete decompression. The occurrence of severe traumatic brain injury, severe patients with poor clinical prognosis, such as death, plant survival and function damage, the medical profession need to explore new therapeutic strategies.

图1 典型患者去骨瓣术后CT影像
[1]
Bullock RM,Chesnut R,Ghajar J, et al. Surgical management of traumatic parenchymal lesions[J]. Neurosurgery, 2006, 58(3 Suppl): S25-46.
[2]
梁玉敏,江基尧.去骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑外伤——放弃还是坚持?[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2012, 28(2): 207-210.
[3]
梁玉敏,高国一,江基尧.去骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑创伤的临床应用进展[J].中华创伤杂志, 2010, 26(1): 83-86.
[4]
江基尧.积极开展循证医学研究,提高中国颅脑创伤患者的救治水平[J].中华创伤杂志, 2012, 28(3): 197-198.
[5]
江基尧,高国一.中国颅脑创伤十年[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2013, 29(2): 109-111.
[6]
Nitta N,Nozaki K. Treatment for large cerebral infarction: past, present, and future[J]. World Neurosurg, 2015, 83(4): 483-485.
[7]
刘佰运,江基尧,张赛.外伤大骨瓣手术方法介绍[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2008, 24(2): 153-154
[8]
Donahue DL,Beck J,Fritz B, et al. Early platelet dysfunction in a rodent model of blunt traumatic brain injury reflects the acute traumatic coagulopathy found in humans[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2014, 31(4): 404-410.
[9]
Kurland D,Hong C,Aarabi B, et al. Hemorrhagic progression of a contusion after traumatic brain injury: a review[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2012, 29(1): 19-31.
[10]
Allison RZ,Nakagawa K,Hayashi M, et al. derivation of a predictive score for hemorrhagic progression of cerebral contusions in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2017, 26(1): 80-86.
[11]
Grindlinger GA,Skavdahl DH,Ecker RD, et al. Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: clinical study, literature review and meta-analysis[J]. Springerplus, 2016, 5(1): 1605.
[12]
Cherian I,Yi G,Munakomi S. Cisternostomy: Replacing the age old decompressive hemicraniectomy?[J]. Asian J Neurosurg, 2013, 8(3): 132-138.
[13]
Alvis-Miranda H,Castellar-Leones SM,Moscote-Salazar LR. Decompressivecraniectomy and traumatic brain injury: a review[J]. Bull Emerg Trauma, 2013, 1(2): 60-68.
[14]
Patel N,West M,Wurster J, et al. Pediatric traumatic brain injuries treated with decompressive craniectomy[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2013, 4: 128.
[15]
Katayama Y,Tsubokawa T,Miyazaki S, et al. Oedema fluid formation within contused brain tissue as a cause of medically uncontrollable elevation of intracranial pressure: the role of surgical therapy[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien), 1990, 51(Suppl): 308-310.
[16]
Taylor A,Butt W,Rosenfeld J, et al. A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2001, 17(3): 154-162.
[17]
Maas AI,Menon DK,Lingsma HF, et al. Re-orientation of clinical research in traumatic brain injury: report of an international workshop on comparative effectiveness research[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2012, 29(1): 32-46.
[18]
Honeybul S,Gillett GR,Ho KM, et al. Long-term survival with unfavourable outcome: a qualitative and ethical analysis[J]. J Med Ethics, 2015, 41(12): 963-969.
[1] 衣晓丽, 胡沙沙, 张彦. HER-2低表达对乳腺癌新辅助治疗疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 340-346.
[2] 施杰, 李云涛, 高海燕. 腋窝淋巴结阳性Luminal A型乳腺癌患者新辅助与辅助化疗的预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 353-361.
[3] 谭巧, 苏小涵, 侯令密, 黎君彦, 邓世山. 乳腺髓样癌的诊治进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 366-368.
[4] 李越洲, 张孔玺, 李小红, 商中华. 基于生物信息学分析胃癌中PUM的预后意义[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 426-432.
[5] 张俊, 罗再, 段茗玉, 裘正军, 黄陈. 胃癌预后预测模型的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 456-461.
[6] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[7] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[8] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[9] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
[10] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[11] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[12] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要