切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (01) : 20 -23. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2018.01.006

所属专题: 经典病例 文献

临床研究

256例重型、特重型颅脑外伤后行大骨瓣减压术患者的回顾性分析
吕学明1,(), 王天助1, 李育鑫1, 袁绍纪1   
  1. 1. 250031 济南,济南军区总医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-30 出版日期:2018-02-15
  • 通信作者: 吕学明

Analysis of 256 cases of severe traumatic brain injury decompressive craniectomy case review

Xueming Lyu1,(), Tianzhu Wang1, Yuxin Li1, Shaoji Yuan1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Ji’nan General Hospital of PLA, Ji’nan 250031, China
  • Received:2017-09-30 Published:2018-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Xueming Lyu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lyu Xueming, Email:
引用本文:

吕学明, 王天助, 李育鑫, 袁绍纪. 256例重型、特重型颅脑外伤后行大骨瓣减压术患者的回顾性分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(01): 20-23.

Xueming Lyu, Tianzhu Wang, Yuxin Li, Shaoji Yuan. Analysis of 256 cases of severe traumatic brain injury decompressive craniectomy case review[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(01): 20-23.

目的

探讨256例重型、特重型颅脑外伤(TBI)患者行大骨瓣减压的远期治疗效果。

方法

单中心回顾性队列研究纳入自2012年7月至2016年12月济南军区总医院神经外科收治256例的因重型、特重型TBI急诊行大骨瓣减压的患者,其中重型(GCS评分6~8分)166例、特重型(GCS评分3~5分)90例,采用标准大骨瓣开颅术,减压窗面积约为12 cm×15 cm左右。术后随访18个月,预后分为良好恢复、中残、重残、植物状态、死亡;其中,良好恢复、中度病残为预后良好者,严重病残和植物状态为预后较差者。

结果

恢复良好/中残患者104例(40.61%),但其规范评估行为、心理表现与心理健康的负担未纳入此次临床评估。重残54例、植物状态38例、死亡60例,共计152例患者预后较差(59.37%),可判断59.37%的患者存在预后不良。

结论

标准外伤大骨瓣减压术是治疗重型TBI脑疝形成的有效方法。发生重型、特重型TBI的患者其临床预后差,表现为死亡、植物生存、功能损伤,需要医学界探索新的治疗策略。

Objective

Retrospective analysis of 256 cases of severe traumatic brain injury decompressive craniectomy (DC) were long-term clinical curative effect.

Methods

A single center retrospective cohort study included from July 2012 to December 2016 in our hospital 256 cases with severe craniocerebral trauma underwent DC in patients with severe (GCS score 6-8) in 166 cases, severe (GCS score 3-5) 90 cases, using standard big bone flap craniotomy decompression open. The window area is about 12 cm×15 cm. After 18 months of follow-up, the prognosis is divided into good recovery, moderate disability, severe disability, vegetative state and death; among them, good recovery, moderate disability for good prognosis, severe disability and poor prognosis for vegetative state.

Results

One hundred and four cases (40.61%) had basic self-care, but the standard evaluation behavior, psychological performance and mental health burden were not included in the clinical evaluation. Forty-eight cases of mild and moderate disability, 44 cases of severe disability, 20 cases of vegetative state, 40 cases of death, a total of 152 patients with poor prognosis (59.37%), 59.37% of the patients can be found to have poor prognosis.

Conclusion

DC is effective for treating severe traumatic brain injury as it could provide complete decompression. The occurrence of severe traumatic brain injury, severe patients with poor clinical prognosis, such as death, plant survival and function damage, the medical profession need to explore new therapeutic strategies.

图1 典型患者去骨瓣术后CT影像
[1]
Bullock RM,Chesnut R,Ghajar J, et al. Surgical management of traumatic parenchymal lesions[J]. Neurosurgery, 2006, 58(3 Suppl): S25-46.
[2]
梁玉敏,江基尧.去骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑外伤——放弃还是坚持?[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2012, 28(2): 207-210.
[3]
梁玉敏,高国一,江基尧.去骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑创伤的临床应用进展[J].中华创伤杂志, 2010, 26(1): 83-86.
[4]
江基尧.积极开展循证医学研究,提高中国颅脑创伤患者的救治水平[J].中华创伤杂志, 2012, 28(3): 197-198.
[5]
江基尧,高国一.中国颅脑创伤十年[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2013, 29(2): 109-111.
[6]
Nitta N,Nozaki K. Treatment for large cerebral infarction: past, present, and future[J]. World Neurosurg, 2015, 83(4): 483-485.
[7]
刘佰运,江基尧,张赛.外伤大骨瓣手术方法介绍[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2008, 24(2): 153-154
[8]
Donahue DL,Beck J,Fritz B, et al. Early platelet dysfunction in a rodent model of blunt traumatic brain injury reflects the acute traumatic coagulopathy found in humans[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2014, 31(4): 404-410.
[9]
Kurland D,Hong C,Aarabi B, et al. Hemorrhagic progression of a contusion after traumatic brain injury: a review[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2012, 29(1): 19-31.
[10]
Allison RZ,Nakagawa K,Hayashi M, et al. derivation of a predictive score for hemorrhagic progression of cerebral contusions in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2017, 26(1): 80-86.
[11]
Grindlinger GA,Skavdahl DH,Ecker RD, et al. Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: clinical study, literature review and meta-analysis[J]. Springerplus, 2016, 5(1): 1605.
[12]
Cherian I,Yi G,Munakomi S. Cisternostomy: Replacing the age old decompressive hemicraniectomy?[J]. Asian J Neurosurg, 2013, 8(3): 132-138.
[13]
Alvis-Miranda H,Castellar-Leones SM,Moscote-Salazar LR. Decompressivecraniectomy and traumatic brain injury: a review[J]. Bull Emerg Trauma, 2013, 1(2): 60-68.
[14]
Patel N,West M,Wurster J, et al. Pediatric traumatic brain injuries treated with decompressive craniectomy[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2013, 4: 128.
[15]
Katayama Y,Tsubokawa T,Miyazaki S, et al. Oedema fluid formation within contused brain tissue as a cause of medically uncontrollable elevation of intracranial pressure: the role of surgical therapy[J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien), 1990, 51(Suppl): 308-310.
[16]
Taylor A,Butt W,Rosenfeld J, et al. A randomized trial of very early decompressive craniectomy in children with traumatic brain injury and sustained intracranial hypertension[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2001, 17(3): 154-162.
[17]
Maas AI,Menon DK,Lingsma HF, et al. Re-orientation of clinical research in traumatic brain injury: report of an international workshop on comparative effectiveness research[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2012, 29(1): 32-46.
[18]
Honeybul S,Gillett GR,Ho KM, et al. Long-term survival with unfavourable outcome: a qualitative and ethical analysis[J]. J Med Ethics, 2015, 41(12): 963-969.
[1] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 梁孟杰, 朱欢欢, 王行舟, 江航, 艾世超, 孙锋, 宋鹏, 王萌, 刘颂, 夏雪峰, 杜峻峰, 傅双, 陆晓峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 联合免疫治疗的胃癌转化治疗患者预后及术后并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 619-623.
[6] 张志兆, 王睿, 郜苹苹, 王成方, 王成, 齐晓伟. DNMT3B与乳腺癌预后的关系及其生物学机制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-629.
[7] 李伟, 宋子健, 赖衍成, 周睿, 吴涵, 邓龙昕, 陈锐. 人工智能应用于前列腺癌患者预后预测的研究现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[8] 陈樽, 王平, 金华, 周美玲, 李青青, 黄永刚. 肌肉减少症预测结直肠癌术后切口疝发生的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 639-644.
[9] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[10] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[11] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[12] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[13] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[14] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?