切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 92 -95. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2021.02.006

所属专题: 文献

颅脑创伤

创伤性脑损伤后不同程度脑积水患者脑室-腹腔分流术临床疗效分析
解东成1,(), 陈红伟1, 王圣杰1, 郭小川1   
  1. 1. 100012 北京,航空总医院脑脊液神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-19 出版日期:2021-04-15
  • 通信作者: 解东成

Clinical effect of ventriculo peritoneal shunt in patients with hydrocephalus of different degrees after traumatic brain injury

Dongcheng Xie1,(), Hongwei Chen1, Shengjie Wang1, Xiaochuan Guo1   

  1. 1. Department of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurosurgery, Aviation General Hospital, Beijing 100012, China
  • Received:2020-01-19 Published:2021-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Dongcheng Xie
引用本文:

解东成, 陈红伟, 王圣杰, 郭小川. 创伤性脑损伤后不同程度脑积水患者脑室-腹腔分流术临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(02): 92-95.

Dongcheng Xie, Hongwei Chen, Shengjie Wang, Xiaochuan Guo. Clinical effect of ventriculo peritoneal shunt in patients with hydrocephalus of different degrees after traumatic brain injury[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(02): 92-95.

目的

研究创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后不同程度脑积水患者脑室-腹腔(V-P)分流术治疗的临床疗效。

方法

选取航空总医院脑脊液病科自2011年8月至2018年8月收治的100例TBI后脑积水患者为研究对象,所有患者均采用V-P分流术治疗。按照不同程度的脑积水情况将患者分成观察组(50例)和对照组(50例),对照组患者为重度脑积水,观察组患者为轻度脑积水,对比2组患者的治疗效果、不良反应发生率、治疗前后GOS和GCS评分及脑室周围水肿带直径。

结果

观察组患者的治疗总有效率(96.0%)明显高于对照组(78.0%),分流管阻塞、感染、硬膜下积液等不良反应发生率(6.0%)低于对照组(24.0%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者治疗后的GOS、GCS评分及脑室周围水肿带直径情况比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

TBI后不同程度脑积水患者采用V-P分流术治疗的临床效果不同,轻度脑积水患者的治疗效果优于重度脑积水患者,不良反应发生率低于重度脑积水患者。

Objective

To study the clinical effect of ventriculo peritoneal (V-P) shunt in patients with hydrocephalus of different degrees after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods

One hundred patients with hydrocephalus after TBI admitted to Department of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurosurgery, Aviation General Hospital from August 2011 to August 2018 were selected as the research object. All patients were treated with V-P shunt. The patients were divided into observation group (n=50) and control group (n=50) according to different degrees of hydrocephalus. The patients in the control group were severe hydrocephalus and the patients in the observation group were mild hydrocephalus. The therapeutic effect, incidence of adverse reactions, GOS score, GCS score and periventricular edema zone diameter before and after treatment were compared between the two groups.

Results

The therapeutic effect of the observation group was 96.0%, which was significantly superior to that of the control group (78.0%), and the incidence of adverse reactions such as shunt obstruction, infection and subdural edema in the observation group were 6.0%, lower than 24.0% in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were significant differences in GOS, GCS scores and periventricular edema zone diameter between the two groups after treatment (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The clinical effect of V-P shunt for patients with different degrees of hydrocephalus after TBI can show that the surgical treatment for mild hydrocephalus has a higher clinical effect and a lower incidence of adverse reactions compared with severe patients.

表1 2组患者治疗效果比较[例(%)]
表2 2组患者的不良反应发生率比较
表3 2组患者治疗前后的GOS、GCS评分及脑室周围水肿带直径比较
[1]
夏照帆,伍国胜.创伤性脑损伤的临床研究进展[J].第二军医大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 117-121.
[2]
章奇,刘苏,孙丽,等.创伤性脑损伤患者认知功能影响因素分析[J].中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志, 2020, 27(4): 427-430, 457.
[3]
黄贤键,吴楚伟,邹隽风,等.创伤性脑损伤后脑积水发生的危险因素分析[J].中华创伤杂志, 2019, 35(3): 216-220.
[4]
Kim JH, Ahn JH, Oh JK, et al. Factors associated with the development and outcome of hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2020, 44(1): 471-478.
[5]
Wang Y, Wen L, You W, et al. Predicting the outcomes of shunt implantation in patients with post-traumatic hydrocephalus and severe conscious disturbance: a scoring system based on clinical characteristics[J]. J Integr Neurosci, 2020, 19(1): 31-37.
[6]
Su TM, Lan CM, Lee TH, et al. Risk factors for the development of posttraumatic hydrocephalus after unilateral decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2019, 63: 62-67.
[7]
Meng F, Wu H, Yang S. Clinical application of ventriculoperitoneal shunting in treating traumatic brain injury[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 18(4): 2497-2502.
[8]
Lim SW, Ao KH, Ho CH, et al. The association between ventriculo-peritoneal shunt and acute appendicitis in patients with traumatic brain injury: a 14-year, population-based study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 103: 106-113.
[9]
何长春.创伤性脑损伤单侧去骨瓣减压术后发生脑积水的危险因素分析[D].银川:宁夏医科大学, 2020.
[10]
孙硕,施辉,周辉.创伤性脑损伤后脑积水患者预后的影响因素[J].中华创伤杂志, 2018, 34(11): 1025-1029.
[11]
Fattahian R, Bagheri SR, Sadeghi M. Development of posttraumatic hydrocephalus requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies[J]. Med Arch, 2018, 72(3): 214-219.
[12]
Nasi D, Gladi M, Di Rienzo A, et al. Risk factors for post-traumatic hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2018, 160(9): 1691-1698.
[13]
胡世颉,李兵,费舟.创伤性脑损伤术后并发脑积水的临床经验总结[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 4(1): 16-19.
[14]
陈晓巍,陈治军,谢腾,等.腰大池腹腔分流术与脑室腹腔分流术治疗特发性正常压力脑积水的临床疗效及安全性研究[J].临床外科杂志, 2019, 27(1): 45-47.
[15]
Weintraub AH, Gerber DJ, Kowalski RG. Posttraumatic hydrocephalus as a confounding influence on brain injury rehabilitation: incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2017, 98(2): 312-319.
[16]
Yang L, Wang X, Li Y, et al. The clinical effect of postoperative hyperbaric oxygen therapy on idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a retrospective and comparative analysis of 61 patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunt[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 104: 376-380.
[1] 张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕. 北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[2] 王颖, 吴德平, 刘煜, 刘国栋. miR-9-5p下调CXCR4减轻创伤性脑损伤大鼠的神经炎症和细胞凋亡[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 65-72.
[3] 张晟豪, 周杰, 姚鹏飞, 李长栋, 屈晓东, 南亚强, 曹丽. 雷公藤红素在创伤性脑损伤后继发性损伤中的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 132-140.
[4] 张薇, 郭姗姗. 轻型创伤性脑损伤远期后遗症流行病学的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 117-121.
[5] 王如海, 韩超, 于强, 胡海成, 孙菲琳, 杨震. 重型创伤性脑损伤患者术后慢性意识障碍的危险因素及其预测价值[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 78-83.
[6] 朱先理, 王守森. 大语言模型在创伤性脑损伤病历书写的应用前景[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 55-57.
[7] 陈浪, 陈玉静, 肖恺, 陈阳, 邵强, 潘力, 胡飞, 王焕明, 陈俊, 徐豪. 脑室-腹腔分流术后脑脓肿一例报道并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 378-380.
[8] 聂玉金, 曹培成. 创伤性颅脑损伤患者保守治疗发生脑积水的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 355-359.
[9] 王如海, 曹祥记, 王绅, 张敏, 韩超, 于强, 胡海成, 李习珍. 凝血指标对中型创伤性脑损伤患者进展性出血性损伤的预测能力[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-349.
[10] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[11] 王如海, 王绅, 张敏, 李春, 韩超, 于强, 胡海成, 李习珍. 重型创伤性脑损伤患者去骨瓣减压术后短期死亡风险的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 285-291.
[12] 王燕, 梁海乾, 郭姗姗. 炎症小体在创伤性脑损伤中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 177-181.
[13] 胡贤瑞, 伍振国, 何竟. 高压氧治疗创伤性脑损伤患者认知功能障碍疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 21-36.
[14] 谢森, 韩轶鹏, 秦至臻, 赵卫良, 毛更生. 脑损伤后慢性炎症反应致巨大占位效应一例报道[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 379-381.
[15] 邸志娟, 李红玲. HBOT在创伤性脑损伤患者中的应用及研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 373-378.
阅读次数
全文


摘要