Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (01): 51-53. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2016.01.013

Special Issue:

• Essays • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Common used coma scales in clinical

Haoju Zhang1, Yi Yang1, Xiaoyu Xia1, Qiuyou Xie2, Guanggang Li1, Yuekui Wu1, Yuanyuan Dang1, Xiaoxiao Yin1, Jianghong He1, Hui Jiao1, Ronghao Yu2, Yonghua Huang1, Ruxiang Xu1,()   

  1. 1. The Affiliated Bayi Brain Hospital, The Military General Hospital of Beijing PLA, Beijing 100700, China
    2. Departmen of Neurosurgery, The Military General Hospital of Guangzhou PLA, Guangzhou 510010, China
  • Received:2015-12-04 Online:2016-02-15 Published:2016-02-15
  • Contact: Ruxiang Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Ruxiang, Email:

Abstract:

Patients once died from craniocerebral trauma and cerebrovascular event nowadays are probably survive thanks to the development of medicine, especially the Intensive care unit.Many of them suffer from disorder of consciousness in varying degrees during the recovery period of the injury.Some scales have been formulated to diagnose and to help assess the recovery of consciousness. The most commom Scales are GCS, FOUR, CRS-R, WHIM, SMART, etc.What advantages and disadvantages do these scales have and how to chose in clinical work? Here are some advices.

Key words: Disorders of consciousness, Vegetative state, Minimally conscious state, Coma scale

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-64229160 E-mail: zhsjcswk2015@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd