切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (04) : 205 -208. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2018.04.004

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

创伤性颅脑损伤行大骨瓣减压术并发脑积水的临床诊疗
吕学明1, 赵振宇1, 王天助1, 王衍廷1, 初晨宇1, 卢培刚1,(), 袁绍纪1   
  1. 1. 250031 济南,济南军区总医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-20 出版日期:2018-08-15
  • 通信作者: 卢培刚

Clinical diagnosis and treatment of traumatic brain injury complicated with hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy

Xueming Lyu1, Zhenyu Zhao1, Tianzhu Wang1, Yanting Wang1, Chenyu Chu1, Peigang Lu1,(), Shaoji Yuan1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Ji’nan Military General Hospital, Ji’nan 250031, China
  • Received:2018-04-20 Published:2018-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Peigang Lu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lu Peigang, Email:
引用本文:

吕学明, 赵振宇, 王天助, 王衍廷, 初晨宇, 卢培刚, 袁绍纪. 创伤性颅脑损伤行大骨瓣减压术并发脑积水的临床诊疗[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(04): 205-208.

Xueming Lyu, Zhenyu Zhao, Tianzhu Wang, Yanting Wang, Chenyu Chu, Peigang Lu, Shaoji Yuan. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of traumatic brain injury complicated with hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(04): 205-208.

目的

总结创伤性颅脑损伤(TBI)后大骨瓣减压术后脑积水发生的危险因素与治疗措施。

方法

单中心回顾性队列研究济南军区总医院神经外科自2012年7月至2016年12月收治的TBI后行大骨瓣减压术的196例幸存患者的临床资料,根据患者术后5~15 d内的头颅CT或MRI影像资料分为2组:有纵裂积液或/和硬膜下积液为A组(n=81),无纵裂积液或/和硬膜下积液为B组(n=115)。2组病例复查出现纵裂积液或/和硬膜下积液者给予腰大池持续外引流术及脑室-腹腔分流术(VPS)。

结果

随访6个月复查头颅CT或MRI,A组81例患者中57例出现脑积水,发生率70.0%,B组115例患者中仅10例出现脑积水,发生率8.7%。2组患者脑积水发生率差异有统计学意义(χ2=80.35,P<0.05)。A组患者给予5~10 d腰大池持续外引流术,术后未出现脑积水症状的患者24例,有效率42.1%;B组6个月内随访并发脑积水者10例,给予腰大池持续引流4~7 d,拔出引流术管后脑积水复发10例。2组经治疗后共67例脑积水患者行VPS,脑积水影像学表现及患者临床症状(GCS评分增高)改善者62例,有效率92.5%。

结论

TBI后行大骨瓣减压术出现纵裂积液或/和硬膜下积液是脑积水发生的因素之一。一旦出现纵裂积液或/和硬膜下积液,则应对患者追踪头颅CT随访,给予积极对症治疗改善临床症状。

Objective

To summarize the risk factors and treatment of hydrocephalus after traumatic craniocerebral trauma.

Methods

A single center retrospective cohort study of 196 surviving patients with traumatic craniocerebral trauma after traumatic craniocerebral trauma from July 2012 to December 2016 in Department of Neurosurgery, Ji’nan Military General Hospital, was divided into 2 groups according to the skull CT or MRI images within 5-15 d after operation: longitudinal fissure effusion or/and subdural subdural. The effusion was A group (81 cases), and no longitudinal fissure effusion or/or subdural effusion was B group (115 cases). Continuous lumbar external cistern drainage and ventriculoperitoneal shunt were used to treat patients with longitudinal fissure effusion and/or subdural effusion in group A.

Results

CT or MRI were followed up for 6 months. Fifty seven of the 81 patients in group A had hydrocephalus, the incidence was 70%. Only 10 of the 115 patients in group B had hydrocephalus, and the incidence was 8.7%. The incidence of hydrocephalus in the 2 groups was statistically significant (χ2=80.35, P<0.05). Patients in group A were given 5-10 d lumbar cistern continuous external drainage, 24 patients had no symptoms of hydrocephalus after operation, and the effective rate was 49%. Group B was followed up with hydrocephalus in 10 cases within 6 months, and 4-7 d was continuously drained in the lumbar cistern, and 10 cases of hydrocephalus were relapsed after pulling out the drainage tube. Two groups of A and B were treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), hydrocephalus imaging and patients’clinical symptoms (GCS score increased) in 62 cases, with an effective rate of 92.5%.

Conclusion

The occurrence of longitudinal hydrops and/or subdural effusion after craniocerebral trauma is one of the causes of hydrocephalus. Once there is longitudinal fissure effusion and/or subdural effusion, follow up CT follow-up should be followed, positive symptomatic treatment should be given and clinical symptoms should be improved.

图1 重型颅脑损伤患者行双侧去骨瓣减压术前术后CT表现
[1]
Ki HJ,Lee HJ,Lee HJ, et al. The risk factors for hydrocephalus and subdural hygroma after decompressive craniectomy in head injured patients[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2015, 58(3): 254-261.
[2]
王忠诚.神经外科学[M].第1版.武汉:湖北科学技术出版社, 1998: 330.
[3]
Lee KS,Bee WK,Doh JW, et al. Origin of chronic subdural haematoma and relation to traumatic subdural lesions[J]. Brain Inj, 1998, 12(11): 901-910.
[4]
Yang NR,Song J,Yoon KW, et al. How early can we perform cranioplasty for traumatic brain injury after decompressive craniectomy? A retrospective multicenter study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 110: e160-e167.
[5]
Krause-Titz UR,Warneke N,Freitag-Wolf S, et al. Factors influencing the outcome (GOS) in reconstructive cranioplasty[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2016, 39(1): 133-139.
[6]
Nalbach SV,Ropper AE,Dunn IF, et al. Craniectomy-associated progressive extra-axial collections with treated hydrocephalus (CAPECTH): redefining a common complication of decompressive craniectomy[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2012, 19(9): 1222-1227.
[7]
Jung YT,Lee SP,Cho JI. An improved one-stage operation of cranioplasty and ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patient with hydrocephalus and large cranial defect[J]. Korean J Neurotrauma, 2015, 11(2): 93-99.
[8]
Oh CH,Park CO,Hyun DK, et al. Comparative study of outcomes between shunting after cranioplasty and in cranioplasty after shunting in large concave flaccid cranial defect with hydrocephalus[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2008, 44(4): 211-216.
[9]
Li G,Wen L,Zhan RY, et al. Cranioplasty for patients developing large cranial defects combined with post-traumatic hydrocephalus after head trauma[J]. Brain Inj, 2008, 22(4), 333-337.
[10]
Tejada-Solís S,Díez-Valle R,Domínguez-Echavarri PD, et al. Infratentorial hygroma secondary to decompressive craniectomy after cerebellar infarction[J]. Neurocirugia (Astur), 2009, 20(5): 470-473.
[11]
Kaen A,Jimenez-Roldan L,Alday R, et al. Interhemispheric hygroma after decompressive craniectomy: does it predict posttraumatic hydrocephalus[J]? J Neurosurg, 2010, 113(6): 1287-1293.
[12]
De Bonis P,Sturiale CL,Anile C, et al. Decompressive craniectomy, interhemispheric hygroma and hydrocephalus: a timeline of events[J]? Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2013, 115(8): 1308-1312.
[13]
Lee KS,Bae WK,Bae HG, et al. The fate of traumatic subdural hygroma in serial computed tomographic scans[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2000, 15(5): 560-568.
[14]
Vedantam A,Yamal JM,Hwang H, et al. Factors associated with shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury[J]. J Neurosurg, 2017, Epub ahead of print.
[15]
Elkafrawy F,Reda I,Elsirafy M, et al. Three-dimensional constructive interference in steady state sequences and phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging of arrested hydrocephalus[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 98: 296-302.
[16]
Hong J,Barrena BG,Lollis SS, et al. Surgical management of arrested hydrocephalus: case report, literature review, and 18-month follow-up[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2016, 151: 79-85.
[1] 熊微, 李胜利, 林清秀, 张梅芳. 胎儿侧脑室扩张程度与妊娠结局[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(03): 290-295.
[2] 张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕. 北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[3] 张雯, 徐宏燕, 张彦春, 李东阳, 刘凯波. 北京市胎儿及婴儿先天性脑积水发生情况及婴儿期转归[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(06): 657-662.
[4] 王柠, 王佳伟, 刘旭阳. 重视眼颅压力差在多学科领域的应用[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 321-325.
[5] 王奎重, 王天助, 袁冶, 胡金娜, 杜嘉庚, 袁绍纪. 三维重建术前计划在经侧脑室后角穿刺脑室-腹腔分流术中的应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 361-364.
[6] 吴晓凡, 罗书引, 冯二艳. 交通性脑积水脑室-腹腔分流术后迟发性颅内出血发生风险的列线图预测模型构建与评估[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 276-281.
[7] 卢盛华, 刘佰运. 创伤性脑积水患者功能评价的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 178-182.
[8] 韦强, 秦赢, 王光明, 周立祥, 付双林, 栾永昕. 腰大池-腹腔分流术治疗交通性脑积水的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 173-177.
[9] 周智, 王飚, 雷军, 黄弋洋, 汤秉洪, 毛磊. 去骨瓣减压术后硬膜下积液的治疗措施分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(01): 44-46.
[10] 柏瑞, 赵丽娜, 陈毅, 马宁. 脑室-腹腔分流术后感染的影响因素分析及手术操作改良[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 345-349.
[11] 管诚, 沈剑虹, 管义祥, 陈建静. 标准大骨瓣减压结合腰大池持续引流术对重型颅脑损伤的疗效与预后的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(05): 281-287.
[12] 王如海, 孙菲琳, 杨震, 韩超, 于强, 胡海成. 硬膜下积液厚度对创伤性硬膜下积液转化为慢性硬膜下血肿的预测价值[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 227-231.
[13] 张新, 周剑云, 曹泽, 孙炜. 微创技术方案下脑室腹腔分流术效果分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(12): 917-921.
[14] 黄贞亮, 赵铎. 针刀治疗胶质瘤术后头痛案[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2022, 11(04): 144-145.
[15] 刘忠, 田新华, 杨为祝, 张峰林. 神经内镜在治疗丘脑出血破入脑室中的入路选择及研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 328-330.
阅读次数
全文


摘要