切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 178 -182. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2022.03.009

综述

创伤性脑积水患者功能评价的研究进展
卢盛华1, 刘佰运1,()   
  1. 1. 100070 北京,北京市神经外科研究所中枢神经系统损伤研究北京市重点实验室和首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-20 出版日期:2022-06-15
  • 通信作者: 刘佰运

Research progress in functional evaluation of patients with post-traumatic hydrocephalus

Shenghua Lu1, Baiyun Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Central Nervous System Injury and Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
  • Received:2021-11-20 Published:2022-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Baiyun Liu
引用本文:

卢盛华, 刘佰运. 创伤性脑积水患者功能评价的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 178-182.

Shenghua Lu, Baiyun Liu. Research progress in functional evaluation of patients with post-traumatic hydrocephalus[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(03): 178-182.

创伤性脑积水(PTH)是继发于颅脑损伤的脑积水,早期准确的诊断对改善患者预后十分重要。目前临床对PTH的诊断主要基于病史、临床表现和影像学表现,对临床表现的评价主要分为日常生活功能的评价、认知功能的评价、步态障碍的评价、排尿功能障碍的评价以及对脑积水症状的综合评价。通过目前国际公认的具有良好信效度的评定量表,评价PTH患者的功能变化,能够为患者的诊断、治疗方式的选择提供客观依据。本文就适合PTH患者功能评价的量表及研究进展作一综述。

Post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) is a type of hydrocephalus which happens after traumatic brain injury (TBI), early and accurate diagnosis is important to improve patient outcomes. At present, the clinical diagnosis of PTH is mainly based on the medical history, clinical manifestatons and imaging manifestations. The assessment of patients' cslinical manifestations is mainly divided into the evaluation of daily life, cognitive function, gait abnormality, urination disorder and comprehensive evaluation of hydrocephalus symptoms. Through the current internationally recognized rating scale with good reliability and validity, assessing the functional changes of PTH patients can provide an objective basis for the diagnosis and treatment mode selection of patients. This paper reviews the scale and assessment compatible to PTH patient and research progress.

[1]
中华神经外科分会神经创伤专业组,中华创伤学会分会神经创伤专业组.颅脑创伤后脑积水诊治中国专家共识[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2014, 30(8): 840-843.
[2]
中华医学会神经外科学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会,中国神经外科重症管理协作组.中国特发性正常压力脑积水诊治专家共识(2016)[J].中华医学杂志, 2016, 96(21): 1635-1638.
[3]
周良辅.负压和低压性脑积水[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2016, 2(6): 321-327.
[4]
刘佰运.创伤性脑积水的诊治[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 4(3): 129-131.
[5]
Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2017, 16(12): 987-1048.
[6]
Mazzini L, Campini R, Angelino E, et al. Posttraumatic hydrocephalus: a clinical, neuroradiologic, and neuropsychologic assessment of long-term outcome[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2003, 84(11): 1637-1641.
[7]
Ki HJ, Lee HJ, Lee HJ, et al. The risk factors for hydrocephalus and subdural hygroma after decompressive craniectomy in head injured patients[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2015, 58(3): 254-261.
[8]
Akins PT, Guppy KH. Are hygromas and hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy caused by impaired brain pulsatility, cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics, and glymphatic drainage? Literature overview and illustrative cases[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 130: e941-e952.
[9]
Wen L, Wan S, Zhan RY, et al. Shunt implantation in a special sub-group of post-traumatic hydrocephalus--patients have normal intracranial pressure without clinical representations of hydrocephalus[J]. Brain Inj, 2009, 23(1): 61-64.
[10]
Colicos MA, Dixon CE, Dash PK. Delayed, selective neuronal death following experimental cortical impact injury in rats: possible role in memory deficits[J]. Brain Res, 1996, 739(1-2): 111-119.
[11]
Jorge RE, Acion L, Starkstein SE, et al. Hippocampal volume and mood disorders after traumatic brain injury[J]. Biol Psychiatry, 2007, 62(4): 332-338.
[12]
Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, et al. The barthel ADL index: a reliability study[J]. Int Disabil Stud, 1988, 10(2): 61-63.
[13]
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the barthel index for stroke rehabilitation[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1989, 42(8): 703-709.
[14]
Hsieh YW, Wang CH, Wu SC, et al. Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the barthel index in stroke patients[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2007, 21(3): 233-238.
[15]
Ohura T, Ishizaki T, Higashi T, et al. Reliability and validity tests of an evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index [J]. Int J Ther Rehabil, 2013, 18(8): 422-428.
[16]
Ohura T, Higashi T, Ishizaki T, et al. Assessment of the validity and internal consistency of a performance evaluation tool based on the japanese version of the modified barthel index for elderly people living at home[J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26(12): 1971-1974.
[17]
Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation[J]. Top Geriatr Rehabil, 1986, 1(3): 59-74.
[18]
Beninato M, Gill-Body KM, Salles S, et al. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the fim instrument in patients with stroke[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006, 87(1): 32-39.
[19]
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 1975, 12(3): 189-198.
[20]
Andrews JS, Desai U, Kirson NY, et al. Disease severity and minimal clinically important differences in clinical outcome assessments for Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials[J]. Alzheimers Dement (N Y), 2019, 5: 354-363.
[21]
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The montreal cognitive assessment, moca: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2005, 53(4): 695-699.
[22]
Lu J, Li D, Li F, et al. Montreal cognitive assessment in detecting cognitive impairment in chinese elderly individuals: a population-based study[J]. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 2011, 24(4): 184-190.
[23]
Wu CY, Hung SJ, Lin KC, et al. Responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference, and validity of the moca in stroke rehabilitation[J]. Occup Ther Int, 2019, 2019: 2517658.
[24]
Fong KNK, Lee KKL, Tsang ZPY, et al. The clinical utility, reliability and validity of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test-Third Edition (RBMT-3) in Hong Kong older adults with or without cognitive impairments[J]. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2019, 29(1): 144-159.
[25]
吴积宝.非语言性认知功能评估量表的编制及标准化[D].广州:南方医科大学, 2014.
[26]
Lim L, Ng TP, Ong AP, et al. A novel language-neutral visual cognitive assessment test(VCAT): validation in four southeast Asian countries[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2018, 10(1): 6.
[27]
Fisher CM. The clinical picture in occult hydrocephalus[J]. Clin Neurosurg, 1977, 24: 270-284.
[28]
Lenfeldt N, Larsson A, Nyberg L, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging reveals supplementary lesions to frontal white matter in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus[J]. Neurosurgery, 2011, 68(6): 1586-1593; discussion 1593.
[29]
Gallagher R, Marquez J, Osmotherly P. Gait and balance measures can identify change from a cerebrospinal fluid tap test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2018, 99(11): 2244-2250.
[30]
Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1986, 34(2): 119-126.
[31]
van Iersel MB, Benraad CE, Rikkert MG. Validity and reliability of quantitative gait analysis in geriatric patients with and without dementia[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2007, 55(4): 632-634.
[32]
Sterke CS, Huisman SL, van Beeck EF, et al. Is the tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) a feasible and valid predictor of short-term fall risk in nursing home residents with dementia?[J]. Int Psychogeriatr, 2010, 22(2): 254-263.
[33]
Hao J, Yang P, Chen L, et al. A gait patterns recognition approach based on surface electromyography and three-axis acceleration signals[J]. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 2019, 533(1): 012060.
[34]
王琪,王涛,张硕,等.一种基于CS-SVM的老年人异常步态识别系统[J].小型微型计算机系统, 2020, 41(4): 878-882.
[35]
Sakakibara R, Uchida Y, Ishii K, et al. Bladder recovery relates with increased mid-cingulate perfusion after shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a single-photon emission tomography study[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2016, 48(2): 169-174.
[36]
Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, et al. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence[J]. Neurourology and urodynamics, 2004, 23(4): 322-330.
[37]
Lim R, Liong ML, Lim KK, et al. The minimum clinically important difference of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaires (ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ -LUTSqol)[J]. Urology, 2019, 133: 91-95.
[38]
Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, et al. Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: the ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence severity index[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2009, 28(5): 411-415.
[39]
Mori K. Management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a multiinstitutional study conducted in Japan[J]. J Neurosurg, 2001, 95(6): 970-973.
[40]
Broggi M, Redaelli V, Tringali G, et al. Normal pressure hydrocephalus and parkinsonism: preliminary data on neurosurgical and neurological treatment[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 90: 348-356.
[41]
Hankemeier A, Rollnik JD. The Early Functional Abilities (EFA) scale to assess neurological and neurosurgical early rehabilitation patients[J]. BMC Neurol, 2015, 15: 207.
[1] 杨占宇, 黄艳华, 马小迪, 冯安莹, 王旼娴, 龙青燕. 本体感觉训练对踝关节周围骨折患者步行能力的改善[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 477-483.
[2] 杨滢甄, 黄子荣, 梁家敏, 黄晓芳, 胡艳, 朱伟民. 膝关节前交叉韧带重建术前康复治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 538-544.
[3] 孙俊锋, 涂家金, 付丹, 蒋满香, 刘金晶, 崔乃硕. 手部烧伤瘢痕挛缩畸形整形术后综合康复联合点阵二氧化碳激光治疗的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 411-415.
[4] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[5] 李月平, 李科, 乔禹铭, 钟美浓. 前列腺热蒸汽消融术医护康一体化快速康复模式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 464-472.
[6] 曹健, 冯高华, 周卫军, 陈诚, 沈王丰, 吴英姿. 补脾益肺膏联合肺康复训练治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 781-784.
[7] 杨轲, 丁增巴姆, 马静, 李盼盼, 陈婷. 全程无缝隙肺康复训练在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 801-804.
[8] 朱志, 张鑫炜, 谭文斐, 高梓茗, 赵睿涵, 杨野, 王世洋, 智冬梅, 赵鑫, 尹长欣, 高畅远, 王锡山, 王振宁, 李凯, 周海涛. 直肠癌经自然腔道取标本手术在日间手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 329-334.
[9] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[10] 吴东阳, 林向丹, 石佐林, 赵玉龙, 王振, 文安国, 纪鑫, 李俊之, 赵明光. NF-L、NLRP3、S100B 蛋白在颅脑损伤严重程度及预后评估中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 279-285.
[11] 罗磊, 熊建平, 郑宏伟, 王嗣嵩, 柴祥, 吴青, 潘海鹏. 静脉留置针穿刺引流治疗颅骨修补术后硬膜外积液一例报道[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-317.
[12] 陈冬冬, 余程冬, 曹晓光. 上肢外骨骼机器人在脑卒中康复中的应用与研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 312-317.
[13] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[14] 贾玲玲, 滕飞, 常键, 黄福, 刘剑萍. 心肺康复在各种疾病中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 859-862.
[15] 刘芳明, 石秀秀, 唐冲, 张克石, 徐影, 王桂杉, 关振鹏, 李晓. 骨科康复患者对数字疗法应用的知晓度和需求度:一项基于928 份问卷调查结果分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 654-661.
阅读次数
全文


摘要