切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 178 -182. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2022.03.009

综述

创伤性脑积水患者功能评价的研究进展
卢盛华1, 刘佰运1,()   
  1. 1. 100070 北京,北京市神经外科研究所中枢神经系统损伤研究北京市重点实验室和首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-20 出版日期:2022-06-15
  • 通信作者: 刘佰运

Research progress in functional evaluation of patients with post-traumatic hydrocephalus

Shenghua Lu1, Baiyun Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Central Nervous System Injury and Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
  • Received:2021-11-20 Published:2022-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Baiyun Liu
引用本文:

卢盛华, 刘佰运. 创伤性脑积水患者功能评价的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 178-182.

Shenghua Lu, Baiyun Liu. Research progress in functional evaluation of patients with post-traumatic hydrocephalus[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(03): 178-182.

创伤性脑积水(PTH)是继发于颅脑损伤的脑积水,早期准确的诊断对改善患者预后十分重要。目前临床对PTH的诊断主要基于病史、临床表现和影像学表现,对临床表现的评价主要分为日常生活功能的评价、认知功能的评价、步态障碍的评价、排尿功能障碍的评价以及对脑积水症状的综合评价。通过目前国际公认的具有良好信效度的评定量表,评价PTH患者的功能变化,能够为患者的诊断、治疗方式的选择提供客观依据。本文就适合PTH患者功能评价的量表及研究进展作一综述。

Post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) is a type of hydrocephalus which happens after traumatic brain injury (TBI), early and accurate diagnosis is important to improve patient outcomes. At present, the clinical diagnosis of PTH is mainly based on the medical history, clinical manifestatons and imaging manifestations. The assessment of patients' cslinical manifestations is mainly divided into the evaluation of daily life, cognitive function, gait abnormality, urination disorder and comprehensive evaluation of hydrocephalus symptoms. Through the current internationally recognized rating scale with good reliability and validity, assessing the functional changes of PTH patients can provide an objective basis for the diagnosis and treatment mode selection of patients. This paper reviews the scale and assessment compatible to PTH patient and research progress.

[1]
中华神经外科分会神经创伤专业组,中华创伤学会分会神经创伤专业组.颅脑创伤后脑积水诊治中国专家共识[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2014, 30(8): 840-843.
[2]
中华医学会神经外科学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会,中国神经外科重症管理协作组.中国特发性正常压力脑积水诊治专家共识(2016)[J].中华医学杂志, 2016, 96(21): 1635-1638.
[3]
周良辅.负压和低压性脑积水[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2016, 2(6): 321-327.
[4]
刘佰运.创伤性脑积水的诊治[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 4(3): 129-131.
[5]
Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2017, 16(12): 987-1048.
[6]
Mazzini L, Campini R, Angelino E, et al. Posttraumatic hydrocephalus: a clinical, neuroradiologic, and neuropsychologic assessment of long-term outcome[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2003, 84(11): 1637-1641.
[7]
Ki HJ, Lee HJ, Lee HJ, et al. The risk factors for hydrocephalus and subdural hygroma after decompressive craniectomy in head injured patients[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2015, 58(3): 254-261.
[8]
Akins PT, Guppy KH. Are hygromas and hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy caused by impaired brain pulsatility, cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics, and glymphatic drainage? Literature overview and illustrative cases[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 130: e941-e952.
[9]
Wen L, Wan S, Zhan RY, et al. Shunt implantation in a special sub-group of post-traumatic hydrocephalus--patients have normal intracranial pressure without clinical representations of hydrocephalus[J]. Brain Inj, 2009, 23(1): 61-64.
[10]
Colicos MA, Dixon CE, Dash PK. Delayed, selective neuronal death following experimental cortical impact injury in rats: possible role in memory deficits[J]. Brain Res, 1996, 739(1-2): 111-119.
[11]
Jorge RE, Acion L, Starkstein SE, et al. Hippocampal volume and mood disorders after traumatic brain injury[J]. Biol Psychiatry, 2007, 62(4): 332-338.
[12]
Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, et al. The barthel ADL index: a reliability study[J]. Int Disabil Stud, 1988, 10(2): 61-63.
[13]
Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the barthel index for stroke rehabilitation[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1989, 42(8): 703-709.
[14]
Hsieh YW, Wang CH, Wu SC, et al. Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the barthel index in stroke patients[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2007, 21(3): 233-238.
[15]
Ohura T, Ishizaki T, Higashi T, et al. Reliability and validity tests of an evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index [J]. Int J Ther Rehabil, 2013, 18(8): 422-428.
[16]
Ohura T, Higashi T, Ishizaki T, et al. Assessment of the validity and internal consistency of a performance evaluation tool based on the japanese version of the modified barthel index for elderly people living at home[J]. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014, 26(12): 1971-1974.
[17]
Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation[J]. Top Geriatr Rehabil, 1986, 1(3): 59-74.
[18]
Beninato M, Gill-Body KM, Salles S, et al. Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the fim instrument in patients with stroke[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2006, 87(1): 32-39.
[19]
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 1975, 12(3): 189-198.
[20]
Andrews JS, Desai U, Kirson NY, et al. Disease severity and minimal clinically important differences in clinical outcome assessments for Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials[J]. Alzheimers Dement (N Y), 2019, 5: 354-363.
[21]
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The montreal cognitive assessment, moca: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2005, 53(4): 695-699.
[22]
Lu J, Li D, Li F, et al. Montreal cognitive assessment in detecting cognitive impairment in chinese elderly individuals: a population-based study[J]. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 2011, 24(4): 184-190.
[23]
Wu CY, Hung SJ, Lin KC, et al. Responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference, and validity of the moca in stroke rehabilitation[J]. Occup Ther Int, 2019, 2019: 2517658.
[24]
Fong KNK, Lee KKL, Tsang ZPY, et al. The clinical utility, reliability and validity of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test-Third Edition (RBMT-3) in Hong Kong older adults with or without cognitive impairments[J]. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2019, 29(1): 144-159.
[25]
吴积宝.非语言性认知功能评估量表的编制及标准化[D].广州:南方医科大学, 2014.
[26]
Lim L, Ng TP, Ong AP, et al. A novel language-neutral visual cognitive assessment test(VCAT): validation in four southeast Asian countries[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2018, 10(1): 6.
[27]
Fisher CM. The clinical picture in occult hydrocephalus[J]. Clin Neurosurg, 1977, 24: 270-284.
[28]
Lenfeldt N, Larsson A, Nyberg L, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging reveals supplementary lesions to frontal white matter in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus[J]. Neurosurgery, 2011, 68(6): 1586-1593; discussion 1593.
[29]
Gallagher R, Marquez J, Osmotherly P. Gait and balance measures can identify change from a cerebrospinal fluid tap test in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2018, 99(11): 2244-2250.
[30]
Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1986, 34(2): 119-126.
[31]
van Iersel MB, Benraad CE, Rikkert MG. Validity and reliability of quantitative gait analysis in geriatric patients with and without dementia[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2007, 55(4): 632-634.
[32]
Sterke CS, Huisman SL, van Beeck EF, et al. Is the tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) a feasible and valid predictor of short-term fall risk in nursing home residents with dementia?[J]. Int Psychogeriatr, 2010, 22(2): 254-263.
[33]
Hao J, Yang P, Chen L, et al. A gait patterns recognition approach based on surface electromyography and three-axis acceleration signals[J]. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 2019, 533(1): 012060.
[34]
王琪,王涛,张硕,等.一种基于CS-SVM的老年人异常步态识别系统[J].小型微型计算机系统, 2020, 41(4): 878-882.
[35]
Sakakibara R, Uchida Y, Ishii K, et al. Bladder recovery relates with increased mid-cingulate perfusion after shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a single-photon emission tomography study[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2016, 48(2): 169-174.
[36]
Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, et al. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence[J]. Neurourology and urodynamics, 2004, 23(4): 322-330.
[37]
Lim R, Liong ML, Lim KK, et al. The minimum clinically important difference of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaires (ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ -LUTSqol)[J]. Urology, 2019, 133: 91-95.
[38]
Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, et al. Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: the ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence severity index[J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2009, 28(5): 411-415.
[39]
Mori K. Management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a multiinstitutional study conducted in Japan[J]. J Neurosurg, 2001, 95(6): 970-973.
[40]
Broggi M, Redaelli V, Tringali G, et al. Normal pressure hydrocephalus and parkinsonism: preliminary data on neurosurgical and neurological treatment[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 90: 348-356.
[41]
Hankemeier A, Rollnik JD. The Early Functional Abilities (EFA) scale to assess neurological and neurosurgical early rehabilitation patients[J]. BMC Neurol, 2015, 15: 207.
[1] 熊倩, 罗凤. 乳腺癌患者术后康复现状与对策的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 372-374.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 豆艺璇, 黄怀, 钱绮雯, 邢然然, 林丽, 白建芳. 低强度吸气肌训练对机械通气患者肺康复的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 370-375.
[4] 李雪, 刘文婷, 窦丽婷, 刘叶红. 联合护理在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 750-754.
[5] 郑华蓉, 刘俊, 郑艳, 陈玉莲, 廖子敏. 加速康复外科理念下的集束化护理模式在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 643-646.
[6] 钱晓英, 吴新, 徐婷婷. 颅脑损伤并发呼吸衰竭患者早期机械通气的效果分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 526-528.
[7] 贾雪敏, 刘海元. 预康复研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 252-256.
[8] 吕瑶, 张婵, 陈建华, 张鸣青. 压力控制容量保证通气模式在腹腔镜肝细胞癌切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 528-533.
[9] 李飞翔, 段虎斌, 李晋虎, 吴昊, 王永红, 范益民. 急性颅脑损伤继发下肢静脉血栓的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 277-282.
[10] 潘立, 谢理政, 程宏伟, 茆翔. 创伤性颅脑损伤后垂体功能减退[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 308-312.
[11] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
[12] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[13] 李美娜, 宋艳丽, 杨姗姗, 李聚彩, 罗慧利, 吕杰. 三联预康复策略在退行性脊柱侧弯患者围术期的应用效果[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 356-364.
[14] 赵军, 李超杰, 李佳. 雷贝拉唑联合康复新液对治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性的十二指肠溃疡的疗效[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 254-258.
[15] 李岩松, 李涛, 张元鸣飞, 李志鹏, 周谋望. 头戴式虚拟现实设备辅助全膝关节置换术后康复的初步研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 676-681.
阅读次数
全文


摘要