切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 141 -149. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2022.03.003

临床研究

基于CiteSpace的创伤性脑损伤研究文献计量学分析
王鸿1,(), 高俊宏1, 卢青1, 刘进仁1, 范小琳1, 李亮1, 马宁1, 王琪1   
  1. 1. 710065 西安,兵器工业卫生研究所生物效应技术研究室
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-09 出版日期:2022-06-15
  • 通信作者: 王鸿
  • 基金资助:
    基础加强计划技术领域基金(JCJQ2020-01,JCJQ2020-03)

Bibliometric analysis of traumatic brain injury studies based on CiteSpace

Hong Wang1,(), Junhong Gao1, Qing Lu1, Jinren Liu1, Xiaolin Fan1, Liang Li1, Ning Ma1, Qi Wang1   

  1. 1. Biological Effects and Technology Division, Institute for Hygiene of Ordnance Industry, Xi’an 710065, China
  • Received:2022-03-09 Published:2022-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Hong Wang
引用本文:

王鸿, 高俊宏, 卢青, 刘进仁, 范小琳, 李亮, 马宁, 王琪. 基于CiteSpace的创伤性脑损伤研究文献计量学分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 141-149.

Hong Wang, Junhong Gao, Qing Lu, Jinren Liu, Xiaolin Fan, Liang Li, Ning Ma, Qi Wang. Bibliometric analysis of traumatic brain injury studies based on CiteSpace[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(03): 141-149.

目的

通过对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)研究文献进行计量学分析,探索TBI领域的研究热点和研究趋势。

方法

基于Web of Science核心数据库检索2016~2020年TBI研究的相关文献,通过CiteSpace.5.8.R3对发表文章年度分布、作者、机构、国家、期刊、被引情况和关键词等进行分析,并根据关键词的词频、中心性和聚类情况探讨TBI领域的研究热点和趋势。

结果

(1)筛选后共纳入14 991篇文献,美国是发文量最多的国家,哈佛大学医学院是发文量最多的机构。(2)氧化应激、死亡率、儿童TBI、创伤后应激障碍、康复治疗是近5年TBI领域研究热点。(3)TBI的模型及损伤效应-生物学机制-诊断及治疗指南-个体治疗是TBI研究领域的研究趋势。

结论

青少年人群TBI的损伤效应、分子机制、治疗方法的可靠性及有效性是TBI领域现在和未来研究的重点和方向。

Objective

To explore the research hotspots and trends in the field of TBI by bibliometric analysis of the literature on traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods

The relevant literature on TBI research from 2016 to 2020 were retrieved based on the core database of Web of Science. The annual distribution, author, institution, country, journal, citation and keywords of published articles were analyzed through CiteSpace.5.8.R3 and the research hotspots and trends in the field of TBI were discussed according to the word frequency, centrality and clustering of keywords.

Results

(1) A total of 14 991 articles were included after screening. The United States was the country with the most publications, and Harvard Medical School was the institution with the most publications. (2) Oxidative stress, mortality, children’s TBI, post-traumatic stress disorder, and rehabilitation treatment have been the hot spots in the field of TBI in recent 5 years. (3) TBI model and injury effect-biological mechanism-diagnosis and treatment guidelines-individual treatment is the research trend in the field of TBI research.

Conclusion

The damage effect, molecular mechanism, reliability and effectiveness of treatment in the adolescent population are the focus and direction of current and future research in the field of TBI.

图1 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年发文量变化图
图2 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年TBI研究国家可视化图谱圆圈(节点)的大小反应出现的频数;节点的年轮圈代表不同年份发表的论文数量,其中蓝、浅蓝、绿、黄、红分别代表2016~2020年;线条代表两节点的关联性
表1 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年发文量前20名的国家
图3 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年TBI研究机构可视化图谱圆圈(节点)的大小反应出现的频数;节点的年轮圈代表不同年份发表的论文数量,其中蓝、浅蓝、绿、黄、红分别代表2016~2020年;线条代表两节点的关联性
表2 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年发文量前20名的机构
图4 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年TBI研究作者可视化图谱圆圈(节点)的大小反应出现的频数;节点的年轮圈代表不同年份发表的论文数量,其中蓝、浅蓝、绿、黄、红分别代表2016~2020年;线条代表两节点的关联性
表3 发文量前20名的作者
表4 发文量前20名期刊及影响因子
图5 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年TBI被引文献可视化图谱圆圈(节点)的大小反应出现的频数;节点的年轮圈代表不同年份发表的论文数量,其中蓝、浅蓝、绿、黄、红分别代表2016~2020年;线条代表两节点的关联性
表5 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年被引次数排名前10名的文献
图6 关键词聚类图
表6 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年高频和高中心性关键词
表7 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年TBI高频关键词的共词聚类分析
图7 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年TBI研究相关突现词出现的年度排序
图8 Web of Science核心数据库2016~2020年TBI关键词时序图蓝、浅蓝、绿、黄、红分别代表2016~2020年,线条代表两节点的关联性
[1]
Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Chopp M. Animal models of traumatic brain injury[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2013, 14(2): 128-142.
[2]
Christensen J. The epidemiology of posttraumatic epilepsy[J]. Semin Neurol, 2015, 35(3): 218-222.
[3]
Faul M, Xu L, Wald M, et al. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths, 2002-2006[J]. Brain Injury, 2010, 24(3):115-473.
[4]
Jiang JY, Gao GY, Feng JF, et al. Traumatic brain injury in China[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2019, 18(3): 286-295.
[5]
McCrory P, Meeuwisse W, Dvořák J, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport-the 5th international conference on concussion in sport held in Berlin, October 2016[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2017, 51(11): 838-847.
[6]
Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, et al. Traumatic brain injury-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths-United States, 2007 and 2013[J]. MMWR Surveill Summ, 2017, 66(9): 1-16.
[7]
Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition[J]. Neurosurgery, 2017, 80(1): 6-15.
[8]
McCrory P, Meeuwisse WH, Aubry M, et al. Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2013, 47(5): 250-258.
[9]
Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2017, 16(12): 987-1048.
[10]
McKee AC, Stern RA, Nowinski CJ, et al. The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy[J]. Brain, 2013, 136(Pt 1): 43-64.
[11]
Roozenbeek B, Maas AI, Menon DK. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2013, 9(4): 231-236.
[12]
Giza CC, Hovda DA. The new neurometabolic cascade of concussion[J]. Neurosurgery, 2014, 75(4): S24-S33.
[13]
Johnson VE, Stewart W, Smith DH. Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury[J]. Exp Neurol, 2013, 246: 35-43.
[14]
van Dijck JTJM, Mostert CQB, Greeven APA, et al. Functional outcome, in-hospital healthcare consumption and in-hospital costs for hospitalised traumatic brain injury patients: a dutch prospective multicentre study[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2020, 162(7): 1607-1618.
[15]
GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2019, 18(5): 459-480.
[16]
Reuter-Rice K, Christoferson E. Critical update on the third edition of the guidelines for managing severe traumatic brain injury in children[J]. Am J Crit Care, 2020, 29(1): e13-e18.
[17]
Xu H, Pi H, Ma L, et al. Incidence of headache after traumatic brain injury in China: a large prospective study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 88: 289-296.
[18]
Chen C, Dong X, Fang KH, et al. Develop a 3D neurological disease model of human cortical glutamatergic neurons using micropillar-based scaffolds[J]. Acta Pharm Sin B, 2019, 9(3): 557-564.
[19]
Brazinova A, Rehorcikova V, Taylor MS, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe: a living systematic review[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2021, 38(10): 1411-1440.
[20]
Motzkin JC, Koenigs MR. Post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury[J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2015, 128: 633-648.
[21]
Moriarty H, Robinson KM, Winter L. The additional burden of PTSD on functioning and depression in veterans with traumatic brain injury[J]. Nurs Outlook, 2021, 69(2): 167-181.
[22]
Zhang W, Hong J, Zhang H, et al. Astrocyte-derived exosomes protect hippocampal neurons after traumatic brain injury by suppressing mitochondrial oxidative stress and apoptosis[J]. Aging (Albany NY), 2021, 13(17): 21642-21658.
[23]
Sun J, Li X, Gu X, et al. Neuroprotective effect of hydrogen sulfide against glutamate-induced oxidative stress is mediated via the p53/glutaminase 2 pathway after traumatic brain injury[J]. Aging (Albany NY), 2021, 13(5): 7180-7189.
[24]
Li DJ, Chen YL, Chen YY, et al. Increased risk of traumatic injuries among parents of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a nationwide population-based study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(7): 3586.
[25]
Safar K, Zhang J, Emami Z, et al. Mild traumatic brain injury is associated with dysregulated neural network functioning in children and adolescents[J]. Brain Commun, 2021, 3(2): fcab044.
[26]
Botchway EN, Knight S, Muscara F, et al. Rehabilitation models of care for children and youth living with traumatic brain and/or spinal cord injuries: a focus on family-centred care, psychosocial wellbeing, and transitions[J]. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2022, 32(4): 537-559.
[27]
Anderson EN, Morera AA, Kour S, et al. Traumatic injury compromises nucleocytoplasmic transport and leads to TDP-43 pathology[J]. Elife, 2021, 10: e67587.
[28]
Chandran R, Mehta SL, Vemuganti R. Antioxidant combo therapy protects white matter after traumatic brain injury[J]. Neuromolecular Med, 2021, 23(3): 344-347.
[29]
Nathalie M, Polineni SP, Chin CN, et al. Targeting microglial polarization to improve TBI outcomes[J]. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets, 2021, 20(3): 216-227.
[30]
LeBlond E, Smith-Paine J, Narad M, et al. Understanding the relationship between family functioning and health-related quality of life in very young children with moderate-to-severe TBI[J]. Clin Neuropsychol, 2021, 35(5): 868-884.
[31]
Greenberg JK, Ahluwalia R, Hill M, et al. Development and external validation of the KIIDS-TBI tool for managing children with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial injuries[J]. Acad Emerg Med, 2021, 28(12): 1409-1420.
[1] 刘梦柔, 刘沛东, 张城铭, 刘阳, 李鹏翠, 杨自权. 基于文献计量学与可视化分析的骨组织工程支架材料的全球研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(05): 411-420.
[2] 贾红红, 杜文静, 喻昊. 基于CiteSpace可视化分析间充质干细胞治疗糖尿病足的研究现状及趋势[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(05): 282-288.
[3] 张强, 张乐曙, 陈家浩, 王虎, 冯硕, 陈向阳. 肩袖损伤外科治疗研究热点与动态的可视化分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 35-44.
[4] 杨巧巧, 佟琰, 王宏, 谢大洋, 张玉婷, 张庆涛, 于茜, 赵小淋, 曹雪莹, 周建辉. 人工肾研究:文献计量学分析[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 241-247.
[5] 阿迪莱·阿卜杜热西提, 费奥, 邢晓雯, 谢胜强, 张睿, 兰晓娟, 程岗. 三种模拟创伤性脑损伤体外细胞模型的损伤特征比较[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 69-75.
[6] 王建鹏, 廖勇仕, 丁文聪, 李冲, 陈锐. lncRNA在创伤性脑损伤中的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 365-370.
[7] 崔刚, 王德亮, 付茂武, 田璧铭, 王莹, 段虎斌. 创伤性脑损伤后鼠脑内RHO/ROCK信号通路与神经炎症反应及病理性损伤关系的研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 324-328.
[8] 傅世龙, 王国锋, 侯鹏伟, 袁邦清, 魏梁锋, 王守森. 颅脑创伤患者术后再次开颅清除对侧血肿的影响因素分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 287-292.
[9] 宋涯含, 晁洪露, 田华, 窦豆, 赵旻暐. 机器人在骨科应用相关研究的国际现状与趋势分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 59-64.
[10] 胡霁云, 谢树才, 张丽娜. S100钙结合蛋白B与重症神经研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 298-303.
[11] 廖想, 李爽, 曾瑶. 2012-2021年粪菌移植研究的趋势及热点分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 93-99.
[12] 古士锋, 张丽姿, 梁景英, 杜丽丽, 孙雯, 陈敦金. 2011-2021年我国胎盘植入性疾病研究热点:基于CiteSpace可视化分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 159-166.
[13] 何青华, 蚁锐娟, 邓碧丽, 杨康娣, 万贻丹, 史桂华, 陈荃敏, 张晶晶. 基于CiteSpace的经颈静脉肝内门体分流术文献计量学分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 330-335.
[14] 高子昂, 段天骄, 谭玉勇, 刘德良, 段天英. 消化内镜隧道技术国内外研究现状及发展趋势的可视化分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 159-166.
[15] 林淼, 张绍元, 冯明祥, 谭黎杰, 丁建勇. 国内外胸腺瘤研究现状与趋势的文献可视化分析[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(04): 213-223.
阅读次数
全文


摘要