切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华神经创伤外科电子杂志

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 51 -55. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2021.01.012

所属专题： 文献；

临床研究

神经内镜手术治疗自发性幕上中等程度脑出血的临床效果
周军1, 赵月明1, 宋常华1, 赵志明1, 仲伟明1, 邓昌武1, 张聿民1, 李树志1,†()   
  1. 1. 261500　山东潍坊，高密市人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-01 出版日期:2021-02-15
  • 通信作者: 李树志
  • 基金资助:
    潍坊市卫生计生委科研项目(wfwsjs_2018_082)

Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery for patients with moderate supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages

Jun Zhou1, Yueming Zhao1, Changhua Song1, Zhiming Zhao1, Weiming Zhong1, Changwu Deng1, Yumin Zhang1, Shuzhi Li1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, The People’s Hospital of Gaomi, Gaomi 261500, China
  • Received:2020-07-01 Published:2021-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Shuzhi Li
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

周军, 赵月明, 宋常华, 赵志明, 仲伟明, 邓昌武, 张聿民, 李树志. 神经内镜手术治疗自发性幕上中等程度脑出血的临床效果[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 51-55.

Jun Zhou, Yueming Zhao, Changhua Song, Zhiming Zhao, Weiming Zhong, Changwu Deng, Yumin Zhang, Shuzhi Li. Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery for patients with moderate supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(01): 51-55.

目的

比较神经内镜下微创手术与小骨窗开颅血肿清除术在治疗幕上中等程度脑出血患者中的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析高密市人民医院神经外科自2015年12月至2019年12月收治的90例自发性幕上中等程度脑出血患者的临床资料，采用随机数字表法将患者分为内镜组（45例）和骨窗组（45例），比较2组患者的手术情况、临床疗效及预后情况。

结果

内镜组手术完成时间短，术中出血量少，血肿清除率明显高于骨窗组，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。内镜组术后并发症发生率明显低于骨窗组，术后第7天的GCS评分高于骨窗组为9分（P<0.05），2组术后再出血2例；术后6个月采用扩展格拉斯哥预后评分，内镜组预后良好率高于骨窗组，但差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。

结论

神经内镜手术在脑出血患者治疗中安全可行，并且更加微创，能促进患者更早的康复。

关键词: 神经内镜, 微创手术, 幕上中等程度脑出血, 小骨窗开颅
Objective

To compare the efficacy of minimally invasive neurosurgery and small bone window craniotomy in the treatment of moderate supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage.

Methods

Ninety patients with spontaneous supratentorial moderate intracerebral hemorrhage in Department of Neurosurgery of Gaomi People’s Hospital from December 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into endoscopic group (45 cases) and bone window group (45 cases). The surgical condition, clinical effect and prognosis of the two groups were analyzed and compared.

Results

The endoscopic group had shorter operation time, less blood loss and higher hematoma clearance rate than the bone window group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the endoscopic group was significantly lower than that in the bone window group, the GCS score on the 7th day after operation was 9 points higher than that in the bone window group (P<0.05), and there were 2 cases of postoperative rebleeding in the two groups; the extended Glasgow prognosis score was used 6 months after operation, and the good prognosis rate in the endoscopic group was higher than that in the bone window group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Our data indicate that endoscopic removal of moderate hematomas is safe, feasible and minimally invasive, and may promote earlier recovery in the treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.

Key words: Neuroendoscopy, Minimally invasive surgery, Supratentorial moderate-volume hematoma, Small bone window craniotomy
表1 2组患者的一般资料比较
项目 内镜组(n=45) 骨窗组(n=45) χ2/t值 P值
年龄（岁，±s） 55.43±10.91 54.28±12.13 0.232 0.817
性别（男/女） 33/12 30/15 0.476 0.490
血肿位置[例(%)]     0.278 0.598
  基底节区 35(78) 37(82)    
  皮层下脑叶 10(22) 8(18)    
出血量（mL，±s） 42.12±16.43 45.83±4.55 1.078 0.103
破入脑室[例(%)]     0.909 0.340
  是 10(22) 14(31)    
  否 35(78) 31(69)    
术前GCS评分(±s) 7.91±2.64 8.31±2.37 1.013 0.153
切口位置[例(%)]     42.787 0.000
  Kocher点 19(42) 0    
  Keen点 10(22) 0    
  血肿中心投影 16(36) 45(100)    
表2 2组患者手术相关指标比较
指标 内镜组(n=45) 骨窗组(n=45) t/χ2值 P值
平均血肿清除率（%，±s） 90.80±7.22 73.16±21.15 15.734 0.035
再出血率[例(%)] 1(2) 1(2)   0.753a
术中出血量（mL，±s） 70.76±7.2 241.84±50.27 15.763 <0.001
手术时间（min，±s） 103±10.65 221±22.73 4.545 0.009
术后GCS评分（分，±s） 11.01±3.72 9.21±3.92 10.843 0.021
术后并发症[例(%)] 2(4) 9(20) 5.075 0.024
图1 神经内镜下血肿清除术术前、术中和术后的影像学资料
[7]
Nagasaka T, Tsugeno M, Ikeda H, et al. Early recovery and better evacuation rate in neuroendoscopic surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using a multifunctional cannula: preliminary study in comparison with craniotomy[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2011, 20(3): 208-213.
[8]
郭铭，姚晨，官春城,等.立体定向辅助神经内镜治疗基底节区高血压脑出血[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2015, 14(8): 780-783.
[9]
Wang WH, Hung YC, Hsu SP, et al. Endoscopic hematoma evacuation in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2015, 78(2): 101-107.
[10]
Chen CC, Lin HL, Cho DY. Endoscopic surgery for thalamic hemorrhage: a technical note[J]. Surg Neurol, 2007, 68(4): 438-442; discussion 442.
[11]
Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, et al. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1981, 44(4): 285-293.
[12]
Vespa PM, Martin N, Zuccarello M, et al. Surgical trials in intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Stroke, 2013, 44(6 Suppl 1): S79-S82.
[13]
Mckissock W, Richardson A, Walsh L, et al. Primary intracerebral hamorrhage results of surgical treatment in 244 consecutive cases[J]. Lancet, 1959, 274(7105): 683-686.
[14]
Fernandes HM, Gregson B, Siddique S, et al. Surgery in intracerebral hemorrhage. The uncertainty continues[J]. Stroke, 2000, 31(10): 2511-2516.
[15]
Minematsu K. Evacuation of intracerebral hematoma is likely to be beneficial[J]. Stroke, 2003, 34(6): 1567-1568.
[16]
Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Fernandes HM, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2005, 365(9457): 387-397.
[17]
Kirkman MA, Mahattanakul W, Gregson BA, et al. The effect of the results of the STICH trial on the management of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage in Newcastle[J]. Br J Neurosurg, 2008, 22(6): 739-746; discussion 747.
[18]
Gregson BA, Mitchell P, Mendelow AD. Surgical decision making in brain hemorrhage[J]. Stroke, 2019, 50(5): 1108-1115.
[19]
de Oliveira Manoel AL. Surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Crit Care, 2020, 24(1): 45.
[20]
Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Rowan EN, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II): a randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2013, 382(9890): 397-408.
[21]
Pantazis G, Tsitsopoulos P, Mihas C, et al. Early surgical treatment vs conservative management for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hematomas: a prospective randomized study[J]. Surg Neurol, 2006, 66(5): 492-501; discussion 501-492.
[22]
Auer LM. Endoscopic evacuation of intracerebral haemorrhage. High-tec-surgical treatment--a new approach to the problem?[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 1985, 74(3-4): 124-128.
[23]
Xu X, Chen X, Li F, et al. Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery for supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a comparison with craniotomy[J]. J Neurosurg, 2018, 128(2): 553-559.
[24]
Li Y, Yang R, Li Z, et al. Surgical evacuation of spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral hemorrhage: Comparison of safety and efficacy of stereotactic aspiration, endoscopic surgery, and craniotomy[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 105: 332-340.
[25]
Hayashi N, Nishimura S, Numagami Y, et al. Retrospective analysis of effects and complications in cases treated with endoscopic evacuation of intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. No Shinkei Geka, 2006, 34(12): 1233-1238.
[1]
Poon MT, Fonville AF, Al-Shahi Salman R. Long-term prognosis after intracerebral haemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2014, 85(6): 660-667.
[2]
Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J]. Stroke, 2015, 46(7): 2032-2060.
[3]
Steiner T, Kaste M, Forsting M, et al. Recommendations for the management of intracranial haemorrhage-part I: spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. The European stroke initiative writing committee and the writing committee for the EUSI executive committee[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2006, 22(4): 294-316.
[4]
Hemphill JC 3rd, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, et al. The ICH score: a simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Stroke, 2001, 32(4): 891-897.
[5]
周军，岳修臣，赵月明,等.传统骨瓣开颅与小骨窗开颅微创治疗高血压脑出血患者的疗效分析[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 4(4): 217-221.
[6]
Angileri FF, Esposito F, Priola SM, et al. Fully endoscopic freehand evacuation of spontaneous supratentorial intraparenchymal hemorrhage[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 94: 268-272.
[1] 田锋, 郭俊超. 中国微创技术在胰腺癌手术中的应用现状和展望[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 124-128.
[2] 李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 聂向阳. 产后腹直肌分离全腔镜下肌后/腹膜外补片修补术的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 724-727.
[3] 王龙龙, 王灼印, 李瑞欣, 王敬涛, 张云飞, 汲翔, 孙于翔, 王国俊. 俯卧位胸内手工吻合在食管受累≥4 cm的食管胃结合部腺癌中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(06): 331-335.
[4] 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会, 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会, 中国NOSES联盟. 结直肠肿瘤经自然腔道取标本手术指南（2023版）[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 89-99.
[5] 关旭, 焦帅, 彭健, 姚宏亮, 王贵玉, 何庆泗, 郑阳春, 胡军红, 李太原, 康亮, 王振宁, 蔡建春, 江波, 熊治国, 马丹, 孙学军, 丁克峰, 汪泳, 周海涛, 傅传刚, 王锡山. 中国经自然腔道取标本手术41 841例开展现状分析：2022年医师调查报告[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 42-49.
[6] 曹永丽, 王思远, 李宜璐, 吕兵兵, 张春旭, 杨阳, 张远耀, 杨维维, 张文丽, 魏东. 腹腔镜次全结肠旷置造口盲直肠吻合术治疗老年慢传输型便秘的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(05): 392-398.
[7] 胡国睿, 冯震, 王波, 任双义. 不同取标本途径在直肠癌微创手术中的疗效对比[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2022, 11(04): 310-318.
[8] 刘俊, 陈超, 罗赤星, 周波, 王少波, 全中平, 张铭. 神经内镜治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 54-57.
[9] 李钢. 经鼻蝶神经内镜手术垂体瘤切除[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(03): 190-192.
[10] 谭可, 李锦平, 彭玉涛, 吴文汧, 杨子文, 汪阳, 陶立波, 刘畅. 机器人辅助立体定向血肿引流术治疗自发性脑出血疗效及卫生经济学评价[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 205-214.
[11] 孙广卫, 胡昌龙, 邱涛. 不同手术入路下神经内镜治疗老年垂体瘤的效果评估[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 169-174.
[12] 中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 消化内镜超级微创手术创面预处理与抗生素应用专家共识(2023年，北京)[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 83-91.
[13] 令狐恩强. 超级微创手术命名——国家名词委《消化内镜学名词》解读[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 0-F3.
[14] 王磊, 蒋连勇, 徐佩, 毕锐, 胡睿, 谢晓, 刘洪涛, 肖海波, 胡丰庆. 复合式胸壁畸形的联合微创手术治疗[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 143-148.
[15] 许林. 肺上沟瘤的外科治疗进展[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 168-172.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号