切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (04) : 206 -209. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2016.04.004

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

脑积水合并颅内感染的治疗策略
宋昭1, 夏小雨1, 杨艺1, 徐如祥1, 徐永革1,()   
  1. 1. 518100 深圳,南方医科大学深圳医院神经外科;100700 北京,陆军总医院附属八一脑科医院
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-15 出版日期:2016-08-15
  • 通信作者: 徐永革

Treatment strategy of hydrocephalus associated with intracranial infection

Zhao Song1, Xiaoyu Xia1, Yi Yang1, Ruxiang Xu1, Yongge Xu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Shenzhen hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518100, China; The Affiliated Bayi Brain Hospital, The PLA Army General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
  • Received:2016-03-15 Published:2016-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Yongge Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Yongge, Email:
引用本文:

宋昭, 夏小雨, 杨艺, 徐如祥, 徐永革. 脑积水合并颅内感染的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2016, 02(04): 206-209.

Zhao Song, Xiaoyu Xia, Yi Yang, Ruxiang Xu, Yongge Xu. Treatment strategy of hydrocephalus associated with intracranial infection[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2016, 02(04): 206-209.

目的

探讨脑积水合并颅内感染的治疗策略。

方法

选择自陆军总医院附属八一脑科医院2011年1月至2014年8月18例脑积水合并颅内感染的病例,其中15例需要行脑脊液外引流术,3例间断行腰椎穿刺控制颅内压,10例轻中度感染者只予以单纯静脉抗感染治疗,8例感染较重者应用鞘内注射抗生素+静脉抗感染联合治疗。感染控制后6例行内镜第三脑室底造瘘术,11例行分流手术,1例放弃治疗,比较内镜治疗组及分流治疗组间感染控制的天数、二重感染发生率及总体并发症发生率,利用SPSS 16.0统计分析软件对资料进行统计。

结果

感染控制后6例行内镜第三脑室底造瘘术,11例行分流手术,1例放弃治疗,内镜治疗组感染控制的天数平均(14.6±1.7)d,二重感染率为0,术后并发症发生率为33.33%,分流治疗组感染控制的天数平均(22.3±3.4)d,二重感染率为18.2%,术后并发症发生率为45.45%。内镜治疗组及分流治疗组间感染控制的天数及二重感染率有明显差异(P<0.05),而术后并发症总发生率没有明显差异(P>0.05)。

结论

脑积水合并颅内感染治疗难度大,并发症多,在控制感染、避免二重感染发生率方面内镜手术较分流手术有优势,内镜手术应作为脑积水合并颅内感染的首选治疗方法。

Objective

To explore the treatment strategy of hydrocephalus associated with intracranial infection.

Method

To choose 18 patients with hydrocephalus associated with intracranial infection, in the affiliated Bayi Brain Hospital, The PLA Army General Hospital between January 2011 and August 2014. Of which 15 cases need for cerebrospinal fluid drainage, 3 cases need lumbar puncture intermittently in order to control intracranial pressure, 10 cases with mild to moderate infection only be treated with antibiotic by simple intravenous ways, 8 severe cases with both intraventricular injection and intravenous methods. After infection was controlled, 6 cases were treated by ETV, 11 cases were treated by shunt operation and 1 cases gave up treatment.To contrast the number of days of infection controlled, double infection incidence and overall incidence of complications of two groups,SPSS 16.0 statistical analysis software was applled to analyze datas. Measurement data and the count data was expressed with mean+standard deviation (±s) and rate seperatelly. Rates were compared using chi square test, if P<0.05, the difference had statistically significant.

Results

After the infection was controlled, 6 cases underwent ETV operations, 11 cases underwent shunt operations, 1 case of abandoning treatment. The endoscopic treatment groups controlled infection in average(14.6±1.7) days, double infection rate was 0, the incidence of postoperative complications was 33.33%, shunt treatment group controlled infection in average (22.3±3.4) days, double infection rate was 18.2%, the incidence of postoperative complications was 45.45%. There were obvious difference in the number of days before the infection was controlled,and double infection rate between endoscopic treatment group and shunt treatment groups (P<0.05) .The incidence of postoperative complications was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) .

Conclusion

Hydrocephalus associated with intracranial infection had more complications and was difficult to treate.Endoscopic sugery had more superiority in controlling infection, avoiding double infection incidence. Endoscopic surgery should be selected as the first treatment for hydrocephalus associated with intracranial infection.

图1 颅内感染合并单侧室间孔堵塞患者做的透明隔造口+ETV手术中录像图片
[1]
胡志强.神经内镜手术治疗脑积水的现状[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2011, 16(7): 289-290.
[2]
陆业平,黄景慧,郭一新,等.脑室-腹腔分流治疗脑积水60例临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志, 2011, 16(3): 178-180.
[3]
McGirt MJ,Zaas A,Fuchs HE, et al. Risk factors for pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection and predictors of infectious pathogens[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2003, 36(7): 858-862.
[4]
Reichert MC,Medeiros EA,Ferraz FA. Hospital-acquired meningitis in patients undergoing craniotomy:incidence,evolution,and risk factors[J]. Am J Infect Contro, 2002, 30(3): 158-164.
[5]
Kulkarni AV,Drake JM,Lamberti-Pasculli M. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infention: a prospective study of risk factors[J]. J Neurosurg, 2001, 94(2): 195-201.
[6]
李飞,王增亮,吉文玉,等.不同年龄阶段脑积水行脑室-腹腔分流术后并发症的临床分析[J].临床神经外科杂志, 2015, 12(6): 467-469.
[7]
王俊伟,孟辉,吴南,等. 49例脑积水脑室-腹腔分流术失败原因的分析及改进[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2011, 27: 27.
[8]
胡涛,曾祥富,张晓海,等.脑室-腹腔分流术后颅内感染的处理经验[J].中国临床神经外科杂志, 2010, 15(7): 407-412.
[9]
肖国民,孙荣君.保守治疗侧脑室-腹腔分流术后颅内感染6例体会[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2013, 18(1): 48-49.
[10]
Korinek AM,Fulla-Oller L,Boch AL, et al. Morbidity of ventricular cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery in adults: an 8-year study [J]. Neurosur-gery, 2011, 68(4): 985.
[11]
李小勇,王忠诚,李银平,等.脑积水脑室腹腔分流相关性脑室炎治疗方案的探讨[J].中国危重病急救医学, 2005, 17(9): 558-560.
[12]
Dalfino JC,Adamo MA,Gandhi PH, et al. Conservative management of ventriculoperitoneal shunts in the setting of abdominal and pelvic infections[J]. J Neurosurg Pediatr, 2012, 9(6): 69.
[13]
Kestle JR,Riva-Cambrin J,Wellons JC, et al. A standardized protocol to reduce cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network Quality Improvement Initiative[J].J Neurosurg Pediatr, 2011, 8(4): 22.
[14]
陈建设,杨永飞,尹凯.内镜冲洗联合脑室外引流治疗脑室内感染的体会[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2015, 18(4): 90-91.
[15]
林球润,刘安民,蔡望青.腰穿与腰大池引流结合鞘内注射治疗开颅术后颅内感染的疗效比较[J].广东医学, 2011, 32(7): 894-895.
[16]
Parker SL,McGirt MJ,Murphy JA, et al. Comparative effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated shunt catheters in the treatment of adult and pediatric hydrocephalus:analysis of 12589 consecutive cases from 287 US hospital systems[J]. J Neurosurg, 2015, 122(2): 443-448.
[17]
Narayan VB. Treatment of hydrocephalus: Challenges and the way ahead [J]. Indian J Anaesth, 2014, 58(4): 456-457.
[18]
Torsnes L,Blafjelldal V,Poulsen FR. Treatment and clinical outcome in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus-a systematic review[J]. Dan Med J, 2014, 61(10): 4911.
[19]
Kaen A,Jimenez-Roldan L,Alday R, et al. Interhemispheric hygroma after decompressive craniectomy: does it predict posttraumatic hydrocephalus[J]. J Neurosurg, 2010, 113(6): 1287-1293.
[1] 张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕. 北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[2] 王柠, 王佳伟, 刘旭阳. 重视眼颅压力差在多学科领域的应用[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(06): 321-325.
[3] 王永楠, 汤畅通, 殷杰, 谭溢涛. 微创钻孔引流术与神经内镜血肿清除术治疗临界量基底节脑出血的效果对比分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 286-292.
[4] 张志超, 李陈, 韩惠, 周夏, 洪家康. 经额平行白质纤维束立体定向血肿穿刺引流术与神经内镜下血肿清除术治疗基底节脑出血的临床对比分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 299-303.
[5] 张佳元, 王浩, 戴黎萌, 胡继良. 双侧岩下窦采血指导下神经内镜手术治疗库欣病一例报道[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 58-61.
[6] 陈浪, 陈玉静, 肖恺, 陈阳, 邵强, 潘力, 胡飞, 王焕明, 陈俊, 徐豪. 脑室-腹腔分流术后脑脓肿一例报道并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 378-380.
[7] 聂玉金, 曹培成. 创伤性颅脑损伤患者保守治疗发生脑积水的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 355-359.
[8] 刘俊, 陈超, 罗赤星, 周波, 王少波, 全中平, 张铭. 神经内镜治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 54-57.
[9] 邓小鹿, 赵杰, 李健, 李春辉, 何剑, 司道林, 王霞. 神经外科术后泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌颅内感染患儿一例[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 205-208.
[10] 陈雪飞, 卜雄建, 张春良. 神经内镜下经鼻蝶窦扩大鞍底入路颅咽管瘤切除术的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 160-165.
[11] 周军, 赵志明, 刘运锋, 唐兆伟, 宋常华, 刘杰, 李浩然, 吴绍光. 神经内镜下脑室血肿清除术与脑室外引流术治疗脑室内出血的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 86-92.
[12] 孙广卫, 胡昌龙, 邱涛. 不同手术入路下神经内镜治疗老年垂体瘤的效果评估[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 169-174.
[13] 王栋梁, 宋海栋, 焦风, 伍刚, 仁增, 吴文博, 吴科学, 曹旭东, 翁宇. 西藏地区神经内镜辅助手术治疗基底节区脑出血的临床初步研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(10): 1075-1079.
[14] 王学建, 汪志峰, 钱明, 姜雷, 宋校伟, 胡伟梁. 比较神经内镜与钻孔引流对慢性硬膜下血肿疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 65-69.
[15] 王永彬, 贾彦迅, 尹轶广. 神经导航结合3D重建技术引导神经内镜血肿清除术对高血压脑出血患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 153-156.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?