Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02): 106-110. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2022.02.009

• Short Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical application of 3D printing PEEK material in the treatment of skull defect in children

Dong Liu1, Tuertuoheti Tukebai·1, Junhong Zhao1, Yongxin Wang1, Wenyu Ji1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830000, China
  • Received:2021-08-27 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-05-10
  • Contact: Wenyu Ji

Abstract:

Objective

To analyze the application effect of 3D printing polyetheretherketone (PEEK) material implants in children’s cranioplasty.

Methods

A total of 15 pediatric patients with skull defects or skull bone tumors admitted to Pediatric Neurosurgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2019 to March 2021 were selected. The thin-layer CT scanning of the skull (PEEK group) was completed before operation, peek implants were prepared by 3D printing technology, and cranial repair was performed for the child. Meanwhile, the children who underwent titanium mesh skull repair in the same period were selected for control (titanium mesh group). The age, gender, primary cause, location and area of skull defect of the two groups were compared, and the intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

The postoperative incision healed well in all patients. One patient had subcutaneous effusion after operation, which disappeared after puncture, suction and pressure bandage. One patient had a small amount of bleeding in the operation area, which improved after conservative treatment, and the other patients had no obvious postoperative complications. There was no significant difference between PEEK group and titanium mesh group in operation time, intraoperative bleeding, time from the last operation and the incidence of postoperative complications (P>0.05).

Conclusion

It is feasible and safe to apply 3D printing PEEK implant to cranioplasty for pediatric patients.

Key words: 3D printing, Polyetheretherketone, Cranioplasty, Pediatric

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-64229160 E-mail: zhsjcswk2015@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd