Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (05): 299-303. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2020.05.010

Special Issue:

• Short Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Treatment experience of subdural effusion with clinical analysis of 27 cases

Hongwei Wang1, Jianning Zhang1,(), Luokai Huangfu1, Jiangang Kang1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100037, China
  • Received:2020-07-15 Online:2020-10-15 Published:2020-10-15
  • Contact: Jianning Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Jianning, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To summarize the treatment experience of different kinds of subdural effusion.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with subdural effusion who underwent surgery and were followed up completely from January 2009 to October 2014 in Neurosurgery Department of the Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the preoperative imaging features, the patients were divided into bloody subdural effusion (9 patients) and non bloody subdural effusion (18 patients). According to whether the effusion is bloody or not, the individualized treatment plan was selected and observed.

Results

Nine patients with bloody subdural effusion underwent extradrilling drainage, 8 patients of effusion subsided, and 1 patient was invalid. After that, the patients were cured by subaracheal abdominal shunt. 14 patients with non bloody subdural effusion received subdural abdominal shunt, 12 patients were effective, and 2 patients had hydrocephalus after operation, which were cured by ventriculoperitoneal shunt; 2 patients with hydrocephalus were treated by ventriculoperitoneal shunt, all of which were effective; the other 2 patients received initial drainage of effusion, which was ineffective, and then the effusion disappeared after subdural abdominal shunt.

Conclusion

For patients with subdural effusion, it is necessary to carefully evaluate whether the effusion is bloody and whether it is complicated with hydrocephalus. The patients with hemorrhagic effusion were treated with extra drilling drainage, non bloody effusion with subdural intraperitoneal shunt, and those with hydrocephalus were treated by ventriculoperitoneal shunt operation. Satisfactory results could be obtained by individualized treatment.

Key words: Subdural effusion, Subdural-peritoneal shunt, Ventriculoperitoneal shunt, External drainage

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-64229160 E-mail: zhsjcswk2015@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd