Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03): 151-156. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2018.03.006

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative study of craniotomy hematoma removal and minimally invasive borehole drainage for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage

Ze Liu1, Xintao Huang2, Xueming Zhao2,()   

  1. 1. Shanxi Medical University First Clinical Medical College, Taiyuan 030001, China
    2. Department of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2018-03-15 Online:2018-06-15 Published:2018-06-15
  • Contact: Xueming Zhao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhao Xueming, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To compare the levels of serum tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), S100β, neuron specific enolase (NSE) and GCS score in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage after craniotomy and drainage and to compare the effects of two methods on brain injury.

Methods

Forty-six cases of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were divided into drilling group (22 cases) and craniotomy group (24 cases), and the control group were 20 healthy persons for physical examination in the same period. The serum levels of TNF-α, S100β, NSE and GCS score were measured at 1st, 3rd, 7th and 14th days after operation in the drilling and craniotomy groups, and the serum levels of TNF-α, S100β, NSE in the control group were measured. The serum levels of TNF-α, S100β, NSE and GCS score were compared between the drilling group and the craniotomy group at 1st, 3rd, 7th and 14th days after operation and the control group.

Results

The serum TNF-α, S100β, NSE in the drilling group and the craniotomy group were higher than the normal level at the early postoperative period, and they both peaked at the beginning and then gradually decreased (TNF-α: F=38.629, P=0.000; S100β: F=33.381, P=0.000; NSE: F=25.619, P=0.000). The GCS scores of the 2 groups were lower on the 1st to 7th days after operation, and they both increased on the 14th day after operation and were still lower than normal levels (F=11.569, P=0.000). At 1st, 3rd, 7th and 14th days after operation serum TNF-α, S100β, NSE and GCS scores in the drilling group and the craniotomy group were not statistically different (P>0.962).

Conclusion

There was no difference in the effect of craniotomy and drainage on the serum levels of TNF-α, S100β, NSE and GCS scores in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. There is no difference in the effect of the two programs on brain injury. Craniotomy hematoma removal can not easily be considered less effective than drilling and drainage, and two kinds of surgery have their own advantages and disadvantages. Clinical applications need to be flexible according to different situations.

Key words: Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, Craniotomy hematoma removal, Minimally invasive drilling drainage, Tumor necrosis factor alpha, S100β, Neuron specific enolase

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-64229160 E-mail: zhsjcswk2015@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd