切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 40 -45. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2025.01.006

临床研究

额颞部开颅术中应用高频电刀对术后颞肌萎缩的影响
赫道雯1, 孙鹏举1, 宁亮1, 陈洪山1, 王柄森1, 田野1, 高志波1,()   
  1. 1. 236000 安徽阜阳,安徽医科大学附属阜阳人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-05 出版日期:2025-02-15
  • 通信作者: 高志波
  • 基金资助:
    阜阳市卫健委课题(FY2021-029)

Effects of high-frequency electrosurgical unit during frontotemporal craniotomy on postoperative temporal muscle atrophy

Daowen He1, Pengju Sun1, Liang Ning1, Hongshan Chen1, Bingsen Wang1, Ye Tian1, Zhibo Gao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery,Fuyang People's Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University,Fuyang 236000,China
  • Received:2024-07-05 Published:2025-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhibo Gao
引用本文:

赫道雯, 孙鹏举, 宁亮, 陈洪山, 王柄森, 田野, 高志波. 额颞部开颅术中应用高频电刀对术后颞肌萎缩的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 40-45.

Daowen He, Pengju Sun, Liang Ning, Hongshan Chen, Bingsen Wang, Ye Tian, Zhibo Gao. Effects of high-frequency electrosurgical unit during frontotemporal craniotomy on postoperative temporal muscle atrophy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 11(01): 40-45.

目的

探讨额颞部开颅术中应用高频电刀对患者颞肌的影响。

方法

前瞻性选择安徽医科大学附属阜阳人民医院神经外科自2023年9月至2024年3月行额颞部开颅术的91例患者,采用随机数字表法分为2组,即研究组(术中使用高频电刀,48例)和对照组(术中使用骨膜剥离器和双极电凝,43例)。比较2组患者的分离颞肌时间、分离颞肌时出血量及术后总引流量;收集患者术后的影像学资料,三维重建测量颞肌容积,比较2组患者术后颞肌萎缩的程度;统计患者围术期临床资料及随访资料,比较2组患者术后张口受限、面部感觉障碍、咀嚼疼痛、颞部凹陷等不良事情的发生情况。

结果

与对照组比较,研究组患者的分离颞肌时间较短、分离颞肌时出血量及术后引流量较少,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1、3个月,研究组患者的颞肌萎缩较对照组更为严重,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后随访期间,研究组患者术后咀嚼疼痛的发生率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

额颞部开颅术中使用高频电刀分离颞肌可有效缩短分离颞肌时间、减少分离颞肌时出血量和术后引流量,合理使用高频电刀可在一定程度上减轻颞部萎缩,减少患者的生活焦虑,改善患者的生活质量。

Objective

To investigate the effect of high-frequency electrosurgical unit on postoperative temporalis muscle atrophy in frontotemporal craniotomy.

Methods

A total of 91 patients who underwent frontotemporal craniotomy in Neurosurgery Department of Fuyang People's Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University from September 2023 to March 2024 were prospectively selected and randomly divided into two groups using a random number table method: the study group (n=48) using high-frequency electrosurgical unit during surgery and the control group (n=43) using periosteal peeler and bipolar electrocoagulation during surgery. The time taken to separate the temporalis muscle,the amount of bleeding during separation of the temporalis muscle,and the amount of postoperative drainage were compared between two groups. The postoperative imaging data of the patients were collected,and the temporalis muscle volume was measured by three-dimensional reconstruction to compare the degree of postoperative temporalis muscle atrophy between two groups. The perioperative clinical data and followup data of patients were statistically analyzed,and incidence of adverse events such as postoperative mouth opening limitation,facial sensory disturbance,chewing pain,and temporal depression were compared between two groups.

Results

Compared with the control group,the study group had a shorter temporalis muscle separation time,less blood loss during temporalis muscle separation,and less postoperative drainage,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); At 1 and 3 months after surgery,compared with the control group,the temporalis muscle atrophy in the study group was more severe,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); During the postoperative follow-up period,the incidence of postoperative chewing pain in the study group was higher than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

During frontotemporal craniotomy ,the use of high-frequency electrosurgery to separate the temporalis muscle can effectively shorten the time for separating the temporalis muscle,reduce the amount of bleeding during separation of the temporalis muscle and the amount of drainage after surgery. The rational use of high-frequency electrosurgical unit can alleviate temporal atrophy to a certain extent,reduce the patient's anxiety and improve the patient's quality of life.

表1 2组行额颞部开颅术患者的手术相关参数比较
Tab.1 Comparison of surgery-related parameters between two groups of patients undergoing frontotemporal craniotomy
图1 行额颞部开颅术患者术前术后颞肌重建影像资料 A~C:术前CT图;D~F:术后CT图;A,D:冠状位;B,E:水平位;C,F:颞肌重建;黄色为颅骨,红色为颞肌
Fig.1 Preoperative and postoperative reconstruction imaging data of the temporalis muscle in patients undergoing frontotemporal craniotomy
表2 2组行额颞部开颅术患者的术前术后颞肌体积比较(cm3±s
Tab.2 Comparison of preoperative and postoperative temporalis muscle volume between two groups of patients undergoing frontotemporal craniotomy (cm3Mean±SD
表3 2组行额颞部开颅术患者的术后不良事件比较[例(%)]
Tab.3 Comparison of postoperative adverse events between two groups of patients undergoing frontotemporal craniotomy[n(%)]
[1]
Ormond DR,Hadjipanayis CG. The history of neurosurgery and its relation to the development and refinement of the frontotemporal craniotomy[J]. Neurosurg Focus,2014,36(4): E12. DOI: 10.3171/2014.2.Focus13548.
[2]
Park J,Hamm IS. Cortical osteotomy technique for mobilizing the temporal muscle in pterional craniotomies. Technical note[J]. J Neurosurg,2005,102(1): 174-178. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2005.102.1.0174.
[3]
Kadri PA,Al-Mefty O. The anatomical basis for surgical preservation of temporal muscle[J]. J Neurosurg,2004,100(3): 517-522. DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.3.0517.
[4]
Hwang SW,Abozed MM,Antoniou AJ,et al. Postoperative temporalis muscle atrophy and the use of electrocautery: a volumetric MRI comparison[J]. Skull Base,2010,20(5): 321-326.DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1249574.
[5]
古洁若. 诊断学[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社,2021.Gu JR. Diagnostics[M]. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press,2021.
[6]
Yaşargil MG,Reichman MV,Kubik S. Preservation of the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve using the interfascial temporalis flap for pterional craniotomy. Technical article[J]. J Neurosurg,1987,67(3): 463-466. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1987.67.3. 0463.
[7]
Oikawa S,Mizuno M,Muraoka S,et al. Retrograde dissection of the temporalis muscle preventing muscle atrophy for pterional craniotomy. Technical note[J]. J Neurosurg,1996,84(2): 297-299.DOI: 10.3171/jns.1996.84.2.0297.
[8]
宋涛,田金,许锋. 高频电刀发展及临床应用的综述[J]. 中国医疗设备,2016,31(8): 75-77. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2016.08.021.Song T,Tian J,Xu F. Review of development and clinical application of high-frequency electric knife[J]. China Medical Devices,2016,31(8): 75-77. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1633.2016.08.021.
[9]
Palanker DV,Vankov A,Huie P. Electrosurgery with cellular precision[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng,2008,55(2 Pt 2): 838-841.DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.914539.
[10]
Palanker DV,Vankov A,Huie P. Electrosurgery with cellular precision[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng,2008,55(2 Pt 2):838-841.DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.914539.
[11]
Rai SKR,Gajbhiye NKS,Mahore A,et al. Anchoring the temporalis muscle with an intact fascial layer along the superior temporal line in pterional craniotomy: a technical note[J]. World Neurosurg,2022,164: 388-392. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.114.
[12]
Vaca EE,Purnell CA,Gosain AK,et al. Postoperative temporal hollowing: is there a surgical approach that prevents this complication? A systematic review and anatomic illustration[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg,2017,70(3): 401-415. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.10.008.
[13]
Thiensri T,Limpoka A,Burusapat C. Analysis of factors associated with temporal hollowing after pterional craniotomy[J].Indian J Plast Surg,2020,53(1): 71-82. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709953.
[14]
de Andrade Júnior FC,de Andrade FC,de Araujo Filho CM,et al.Dysfunction of the temporalis muscle after pterional craniotomy for intracranial aneurysms. Comparative,prospective and randomized study of one flap versus two flaps dieresis[J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr,1998,56(2): 200-205. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x 1998000200006.
[15]
Rocha-Filho PA,Fujarra FJ,Gherpelli JL,et al. The long-term effect of craniotomy on temporalis muscle function[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2007,104(5): e17-e21.DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.05.029.
[16]
Yasuda CL,Costa AL,Franca M Jr,et al. Postcraniotomy temporalis muscle atrophy: a clinical,magnetic resonance imaging volumetry and electromyographic investigation[J]. J Orofac Pain,2010,24(4): 391-397.
[17]
Brazoloto TM,de Siqueira SR,Rocha-Filho PA,et al. Postoperative orofacial pain,temporomandibular dysfunction and trigeminal sensitivity after recent pterional craniotomy: preliminary study[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien),2017,159(5): 799-805. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-017-3137-9.
[18]
张子豪,刘如恩. 咀嚼肌痉挛的诊疗研究进展[J]. 中华神经医学杂志,2022,21(2): 211-216. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115354-20211102-00705.Zhang ZH,Liu RE. Recent advance in diagnosis and treatment of hemimasticatory spasm[J]. Chin J Neuromed,2022,21(2): 211-216. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115354-20211102-00705.
[19]
Gierthmuehlen M,Jarc N,Plachta DTT,et al. Mastication after craniotomy: pilot assessment of postoperative oral health-related quality of life[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien),2022,164(5): 1347-1355. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-05020-w.
[20]
Costa AL,Yasuda CL,França M Jr,et al. Temporomandibular dysfunction post-craniotomy: evaluation between pre-and postoperative status[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2014,42(7): 1475-1479. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.04.016.
[21]
Abdulazim A,Filis A,Sadr-Eshkevari P,et al. Postcraniotomy function of the temporal muscle in skull base surgery: technical note based on a preliminary study[J]. ScientificWorldJournal,2012,2012: 427081. DOI: 10.1100/2012/427081.
[22]
Miyazawa T. Less invasive reconstruction of the temporalis muscle for pterional craniotomy: modified procedures[J]. Surg Neurol,1998,50(4): 347-351. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(97)00345-5.
[1] 李玉庆, 王刚, 李强, 李云川, 杜明新. 不同吻合术对腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 286-289.
[2] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 不同路径腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的近中期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 317-320.
[3] 李健雄, 周江, 李涛, 乔培宇, 汤鑫, 董明. 两种不同保脾胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾肿瘤的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 325-328.
[4] 卢超, 陈波, 邢志祥, 周鹏, 王帅. 不同入路下腹腔镜解剖性肝脏切除术治疗肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 254-257.
[5] 周丽君, 王露, 林巧. 腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效及并发症对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 146-148.
[6] 陈宝鹤, 张文卓, 王隽. 头尾侧联合入路腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的近中期临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 153-156.
[7] 李国防, 陈凯, 管文贤, 刘颂. 消化道术后吻合口漏小鼠动物模型的建立[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 162-165.
[8] 李贞贞, 王宏刚, 崔丽丽, 缪月琴, 刘万璐. 改良管状胃—食管吻合术在腹腔镜近端胃切除消化道重建中的安全性及抗反流效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 176-179.
[9] 吉林霞, 范小春, 梁琴. 胃癌常见术后并发症类型及危险因素研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 220-223.
[10] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[11] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[12] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[13] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[14] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[15] 陈培培, 李世明, 王泽宁, 付强. 开颅手术额窦处理后继发局部感染的诊治经验[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 52-56.
阅读次数
全文


摘要