切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 38 -42. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2023.01.007

短篇论著

立体定向经额及枕下入路治疗脑干出血的效果观察
江耿思1, 方钦锐1, 黎学谦1, 王振宁1, 邓海亮1, 刘小红1,()   
  1. 1. 523059 广东东莞,东莞市人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-08 出版日期:2023-02-15
  • 通信作者: 刘小红

Observation on the effect of stereotaxic transfrontal and suboccipital approaches in the treatment of brainstem hemorrhage

Gengsi Jiang1, Qinrui Fang1, Xueqian Li1, Zhenning Wang1, Hailiang Deng1, Xiaohong Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, the People's Hospital of Dongguan, Dongguan 523059, China
  • Received:2023-02-08 Published:2023-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Xiaohong Liu
  • Supported by:
    Social Science and Technology Development Project of Dongguan, Guangdong(201950715001637)
引用本文:

江耿思, 方钦锐, 黎学谦, 王振宁, 邓海亮, 刘小红. 立体定向经额及枕下入路治疗脑干出血的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 38-42.

Gengsi Jiang, Qinrui Fang, Xueqian Li, Zhenning Wang, Hailiang Deng, Xiaohong Liu. Observation on the effect of stereotaxic transfrontal and suboccipital approaches in the treatment of brainstem hemorrhage[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 09(01): 38-42.

目的

探讨立体定向经额及枕下入路治疗脑干出血的血肿排空效果。

方法

选取东莞市人民医院神经外科自2019年9月至2022年6月行手术治疗的24例脑干出血患者,根据术式分为经额组(15例)和枕下组(9例)。记录并比较2组患者术中碎吸血肿量、术后血肿残留量、引流后血肿残留量、术中穿刺脑组织深度、术后血肿腔尿激酶冲洗次数、引流管留置时间等指标。

结果

经额组术中碎吸血肿量较枕下组少,穿刺脑组织深度明显深于枕下组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者术后血肿残留量、引流后血肿残留量、术后尿激酶冲洗次数、引流管留置时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

经额入路虽然术中较难碎吸血肿,但置管引流后最终引流效果与经枕下入路基本相同。血肿位置位于脑桥、中脑水平以上者适合选用经额入路,血肿位置位于脑桥后部及破入第四脑室、小脑者适合选用经枕下入路。

Objective

To investigate the hematoma emptying effect of stereotaxic transfrontal and suboccipital surgical methods in the treatment of brainstem hemorrhage.

Methods

Twenty-four patients with brainstem hemorrhage who underwent surgical treatment in Neurosurgery Department of Dongguan People's Hospital from September 2019 to June 2022 were selected and divided into frontal group (15 cases) and suboccipital group (9 cases) according to the operation type. The intraoperative amount of hematoma broken and sucked out residual hematoma after operation, residual hematoma after drainage, depth of brain tissue puncture during operation, number of urokinase washings in hematoma cavity after operation, and retention time of drainage tube were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results

The amount of blood-sucking hematoma in the frontal group was less than in the suboccipital group, and the depth of puncture brain tissue was significantly deeper than that in the suboccipital group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); There was no significant difference between the two groups in the residual amount of hematoma after operation, the residual amount of hematoma after drainage, the number of postoperative urokinase washings, and the retention time of drainage tube (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Although the transfrontal group is more difficult to break and suck out the hematoma during operation, the final drainage effect after catheter and drainage is basically the same as that of the suboccipital group. The transfrontal approach is suitable for hematoma located above the level of the pons and midbrain, and the suboccipital approach is suitable for hematoma located in the posterior part of the pons and broken into the fourth ventricle and cerebellum.

表1 2组患者不同时间点血肿量比较[M(P25,P75)]
Tab.1 Comparison of hematoma volume at different time between two groups [M(P25, P75)]
表2 2组患者尿激酶冲洗次数、引流管留置时间、穿刺深度的比较
Tab.2 Comparison of the frequency of urokinase flushing, drainage tube indwelling time and puncture depth between the two groups
图1 经额组手术前后影像学资料A:术前CT;B:术后CT及引流管位置;C:引流后CT及引流管位置
Fig.1 Imaging before and after surgery in transfrontal group
图2 枕下组手术前后影像学资料A:术前CT;B:术后CT及引流管位置;C:引流后CT及引流管位置
Fig.2 Imaging before and after surgery in suboccipital group
[1]
程登贵,王贵富,甘正凯,等.脑干出血部位和出血量的临床研究[J].吉林医学, 2013, 34(9): 1639-1640. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-0412.2013.09.028.
[2]
陈立华,徐如祥.高血压脑干出血的微创治疗[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2016, 2(4): 252-254. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2016.04.016.
[3]
Gross BA, Jankowitz BT, Friedlander RM. Cerebral intraparenchymal hemorrhage: a review[J]. JAMA, 2019, 321(13): 1295-1303. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.2413.
[4]
李岩,吴冬雪,刘建峰,等.立体定向抽吸手术治疗原发性脑干出血的疗效及其影响因素分析[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2021, 37(12): 1257-1261. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20200617-00358.
[5]
Tao C, Li H, Wang J, et al. Predictors of surgical results in patients with primary pontine hemorrhage[J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2016, 26(1): 77-83. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.12634-14.1.
[6]
冯珂珂,尹绍雅,孙树鹏,等.立体定向穿刺抽吸术治疗高血压脑干出血手术体会[J].中华急诊医学杂志, 2020, 29(2): 272-274. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2020.02.0031.
[7]
Hara T, Nagata K, Kawamoto S, et al. Functional outcome of primary pontine hemorrhage: conservative treatment or stereotaxic surgery[J]. No Shinkei Geka, 2001, 29(9): 823-829.
[8]
刘凤强,王泽锋,俞晓波,等.立体定向精准抽吸治疗原发性脑干出血的疗效及其影响因素分析[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2019, 35(11): 1094-1098. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2346.2019.11.004.
[9]
刘元钦,李翠玲,张磊,等. ROSA机器人在神经外科手术中初步应用体会[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2019, 5(1): 47-51. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2019.01.010.
[10]
李文德,李运军,于斌,等.无框架导航下脑干出血穿刺置管引流术一例报道[J].中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 9(2): 126-127. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2019.02.015.
[11]
中华医学会神经外科学分会,中国医师协会急诊医师分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组,等.高血压性脑出血中国多学科诊治指南[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2020, 36(8): 757-770. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112050-20200510-00282.
[12]
高进保,李文德,于斌,等.立体定向导航下经颞下及枕下2种手术方式治疗脑干出血的效果观察[J].中国医药导报, 2018, 15(18): 175-177.
[13]
高海晓,张卫民,薛振生.立体定向导航下经颞下及枕下2种手术方式治疗脑干出血的疗效观察[J].河北医科大学学报, 2015, 36(5): 579-581. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2015.05.027.
[14]
杨帆,申明峰,姚宏伟,等.脑室内积血患者脑室灌注尿激酶剂量和时间的探讨[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(22): 6618-6621. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2011.22.020.
[15]
王庭忠,王亮,杜敬华,等.脑脊液引出在基底核脑出血微创穿刺术中的意义[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2013, 18(9): 412-413. DOI: 10.11850/j.issn.1009-122X.2013.09.010.
[16]
江耿思,刘小红,陈桂增,等.立体定向脑内血肿穿刺引流中血肿腔与脑脊液相通与否排空效果的对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志, 2021, 50(6): 717-719, 746. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2021.06.019.
[17]
陈健,刘尧斌,刘捷,等.脑干出血的综合救治[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2005, 4(1): 84-85. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-8925.2005.01.027.
[1] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[2] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[3] 陆婷, 范晴敏, 王洁, 万晓静, 许春芳, 董凤林. 超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流对重症急性胰腺炎的疗效及应用时机的选择[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 511-516.
[4] 杨新园, 王淑君, 何成, 宋喜鹤, 刘丽芸. 预防与处理危重烧伤患者经外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管堵塞的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 443-446.
[5] 党军强, 杨雁灵, 汪庆强, 尚琳, 朱磊, 项红军. 主动经皮穿刺引流治疗重症急性胰腺炎并发急性坏死物积聚的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 671-674.
[6] 杨小栎, 李万富, 马柱, 马兰, 郑义, 付晓丽, 王晶. 钳式针一步法在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 535-538.
[7] 石海波, 赵旭东, 王聪, 曲巍. 气肿性肾盂肾炎、气肿性膀胱炎并脓毒性休克一例报道并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 644-647.
[8] 石兵, 张智, 陈金海, 唐文. 基于电磁跟踪和手术导航系统的实时超声引导下两种经皮肾盏穿刺方法的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 572-578.
[9] 杨勇军, 曾一鸣, 贺显雅, 卢强, 李远伟. ASA分级≥Ⅲ级患者局麻经会阴前列腺多模态影像融合穿刺的安全性和有效性[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-447.
[10] 吴伟宙, 王琼仁, 詹雄宇, 郑明星, 李亚县. 广东省医学会泌尿外科疑难病例多学科会诊(第16期)——左肾肉瘤样癌[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-529.
[11] 井发红, 李丽娜, 高婷, 高艳梅, 杨楠, 李卓, 慕玉东. 肺癌立体定向放疗血清SAP 和MMPs 表达及临床意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 707-713.
[12] 张瑜, 姜梦妮. 基于DWI信号值构建局部进展期胰腺癌放化疗生存获益预测模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 657-664.
[13] 张志超, 李陈, 韩惠, 周夏, 洪家康. 经额平行白质纤维束立体定向血肿穿刺引流术与神经内镜下血肿清除术治疗基底节脑出血的临床对比分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 299-303.
[14] 罗磊, 熊建平, 郑宏伟, 王嗣嵩, 柴祥, 吴青, 潘海鹏. 静脉留置针穿刺引流治疗颅骨修补术后硬膜外积液一例报道[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-317.
[15] 李新宇, 梁建锋. 3D打印导板辅助颅内血肿穿刺引流手术[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 382-384.
阅读次数
全文


摘要