切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 224 -228. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2022.04.006

临床研究

自发性脑出血患者流行病学特点与死亡影响因素分析
汤志辉1, 黄巍1, 罗飞1, 王文浩1,()   
  1. 1. 363000 福建漳州,解放军联勤保障部队第九〇九医院(厦门大学附属东南医院)神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-21 出版日期:2022-08-15
  • 通信作者: 王文浩
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金(2018J01152)

Analysis of epidemiological characteristics and mortality factors of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

Zhihui Tang1, Wei Huang1, Fei Luo1, Wenhao Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, the 909 Hospital of the Joint Service Support Force (Southeast Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University), Zhangzhou 363000, China
  • Received:2022-06-21 Published:2022-08-15
  • Corresponding author: Wenhao Wang
引用本文:

汤志辉, 黄巍, 罗飞, 王文浩. 自发性脑出血患者流行病学特点与死亡影响因素分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 224-228.

Zhihui Tang, Wei Huang, Fei Luo, Wenhao Wang. Analysis of epidemiological characteristics and mortality factors of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 08(04): 224-228.

目的

探讨自发性脑出血(SICH)患者的流行病学特点,并分析其死亡的影响因素。

方法

回顾性分析解放军联勤保障部队第九〇九医院神经外科自2015年1月至2021年12月收治的2765例SICH患者的流行病学资料,分析流行病学特征,并根据治疗结局将患者分为存活组(2497例)和死亡组(268例),采用单因素和Logistic多因素回归分析死亡的影响因素。

结果

2765例患者中,男女比例2.54∶1,50岁以上患者是20~50岁患者的2.48倍;第四季度发病率分别是一、二、三季度的1.85、1.88、1.61倍;凌晨发病率分别是上午、下午和晚上的1.69、1.65、1.39倍。单因素分析和Logistic多因素分析结果显示沿海地区、脑出血家族史、入院GCS评分、脑干出血、血肿体积、中线移位≥5 mm是预后的独立影响因素。

结论

本地区SICH患者中男性比例高于女性,第四季度和凌晨发病率较高,重视沿海地区和脑出血家族史人员,结合入院GCS评分、出血体积和中线移位情况可以判断患者的预后情况。

Objective

To investigate the epidemiological characteristics of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) and to analyze the mortality factors.

Methods

Epidemiological data of 2765 patients of SICH admitted to Neurosurgery Department of the 909th Hospital of the Joint Service Support Force from January 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The epidemiological characteristics were analyzed. According to the treatment outcome, the patients were divided into survival group (n=2497) and death group (n=268). Univariate and Logistic multivariate analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors of death.

Results

Among the 2765 patients, the male to female ratio is 2.54 to 1. The number of patients aged 50 or older was 2.48 times than that of those aged 20 to 50. The incidence rate in the fourth quarter was 1.85, 1.88 and 1.61 times higher than that in the first, second and third quarters. The incidence rate of early morning was 1.69, 1.65 and 1.39 times higher than that of morning, afternoon and evening. Univariate analysis and Logistic multivariate analysis showed that coastal area, family history of intracerebral hemorrhage, admission GCS score, brainstem hemorrhage, hematoma volume, midline displacement ≥5 mm were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

In this region, the proportion of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage is higher in males than in females, and the incidence rate is higher in the fourth quarter and early morning. The prognosis of the patients can be determined by paying attention to the coastal areas and family history of intracerebral hemorrhage, combined with the admission GCS score, hemorrhage volume and midline displacement.

表1 自发性脑出血患者发病性别构成[例(%)]
表2 自发性脑出血患者发病年龄构成[例(%)]
表3 自发性脑出血患者发病季节构成[例(%)]
表4 自发性脑出血患者发病时间构成[例(%)]
表5 影响自发性脑出血患者预后的单因素分析
项目 存活组(n=2497) 死亡组(n=268) χ2/t/Z P
性别[例(%)]     0.943 0.735
  1794(71.85) 189(70.52)    
  703(28.15) 79(29.48)    
年龄(岁,±s 53.41±16.75 56.84±15.38 -1.847 0.074
沿海地区[例(%)] 1233(49.37) 178(66.42) 6.864 0.011
吸烟史[例(%)] 728(29.16) 107(39.92) 0.564 0.846
脑出血家族史[例(%)] 183(7.32) 57(21.27) 17.764 <0.001
基础疾病[例(%)]        
  高血压 1957(78.37) 209(77.99) 0.357 0.826
  糖尿病 253(10.13) 31(11.57) 0.319 0.863
入院GCS评分[分,M(P25,P75)] 11(7,14) 7(4,8) 7.357 <0.001
入院生命体征[M(P25,P75)]        
  体温(℃) 36.6(36.4,37.0) 36.7(36.4,36.9) -0.454 0.637
  心率(次/min) 88(79,93) 85(80,89) 1.532 0.121
  呼吸频率(次/min) 21(16,23) 22(16,24) -0.396 0.661
  收缩压(mm/Hg) 146(135,168) 172(141,183) -2.579 0.019
实验室检查[M(P25,P75)]        
  白细胞(×109/L) 12.4(9.7,14.1) 12.7(9.9,14.7) -0.757 0.597
  血糖(mmol/L) 7.1(5.9,8.5) 9.4(7.3,12.0) -6.708 <0.001
  白蛋白(g/L) 42(38,45) 40(37,44) 1.257 0.227
  D-二聚体(mg/L) 1.1(0.4,2.8) 2.2(0.8,3.9) -7.017 <0.001
CT检查        
  脑干出血[例(%)] 16(0.64) 127(47.39) 57.427 <0.001
  血肿体积[mL,M(P25,P75)] 25(18,34) 76(48,87) -13.757 <0.001
  破入脑室[例(%)] 1 538(61.59) 217(80.97) 14.362 <0.001
  中线移位≥5 mm[例(%)] 781(31.28) 191(71.27) 20.083 <0.001
表6 自发性脑出血患者预后多因素分析
[1]
夏捷生,冯建飞,李巧玲,等.自发性脑出血破入脑室与否的预后比较分析[J].临床神经外科杂志, 2019, 16(5): 369-375.
[2]
Wardlaw JM, Benveniste H, Nedergaard M, et al. Perivascular spaces in the brain: anatomy, physiology and pathology[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2020, 16(3): 137-153.
[3]
van Asch CJ, Luitse MJ, Rinkel GJ, et al. Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2010, 9(2): 167-176.
[4]
Cordonnier C, Demchuk A, Ziai W, et al. Intracerebral haemorrhage: current approaches to acute management[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10154): 1257-1268.
[5]
Garg R, Biller J. Recent advances in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. F1000Res, 2019, 8: 302.
[6]
Chen R, Wang X, Anderson CS, et al. Infratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Stroke, 2019, 50(5): 1257-1259.
[7]
Nakada T, Kwee IL. Fluid dynamics inside the brain barrier: current concept of interstitial flow, glymphatic flow, and cerebrospinal fluid circulation in the brain[J]. Neuroscientist, 2019, 25(2): 155-166.
[8]
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国脑出血诊治指南(2014)[J].中华神经科杂志, 2015, 48(6): 435-444.
[9]
Hu S, Sheng W, Hu Y, et al. A nomogram to predict early hematoma expansion of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(7): e24737.
[10]
Chen S, Zhao B, Wang W, et al. Predictors of hematoma expansion predictors after intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(51): 89348-89363.
[11]
Vaartjes I, Reitsma JB, Berger-van Sijl M, et al. Gender differences in mortality after hospital admission for stroke[J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2009, 28(6): 564-571.
[12]
刘文鹏,郑冬,黄家明,等. 2003至2012年间767例自发性脑出血患者的流行病学分析[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2015, 1(1): 16-19.
[13]
Nakada T, Kwee IL. Fluid dynamics inside the brain barrier: current concept of interstitial flow, glymphatic flow, and cerebrospinal fluid circulation in the brain[J]. Neuroscientist, 2019, 25(2): 155-166.
[14]
Khan M, Heiser H, Bernicchi N, et al. Leukoaraiosis predicts short-term cognitive but not motor recovery in ischemic stroke patients during rehabilitation[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2019, 28(6): 1597-1603.
[15]
Sykora M, Herweh C, Steiner T. The association between leukoaraiosis and poor outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage is not mediated by hematoma growth[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2017, 26(6): 1328-1333.
[16]
Chambergo-Michilot D, Brañez-Condorena A, Alva-Diaz C, et al. Evidence-based appraisal of blood pressure reduction in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a scoping review and overview[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2021, 202: 106497.
[17]
Kuhn D, Tiffany L, Beher R, et al. Blood pressure management in emergency department patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Blood Press Monit, 2020, 25(6): 318-323.
[18]
Chen CH, Tang SC, Cheng YW, et al. Detrimental effects of intracerebral haemorrhage on patients with CADASIL harbouring NOTCH3 R544C mutation[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2019, 90(7): 841-843.
[19]
Chang CY, Lin CY, Chen LC, et al. The predictor of mortality within six-months in patients with spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage: a retrospective study[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(7): e0132975.
[20]
杨涛,钱中润,鹿松松,等.自发性小脑出血手术治疗长期预后的相关影响因素分析[J].临床神经外科杂志, 2020, 17(1): 66-70, 76.
[21]
Yogendrakumar V, Ramsay T, Fergusson D, et al. New and expanding ventricular hemorrhage predicts poor outcome in acute intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Neurology, 2019, 93(9): e879-e888.
[22]
Yang WS, Li Q, Li R, et al. Defining the optimal midline shift threshold to predict poor outcome in patients with supratentorial spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2018, 28(3): 314-321.
[1] 韩珊珊, 徐琰, 陈卿, 杨钰坪, 明佳, 周妮娅, 李雪, 刘科. 近日节律紊乱与乳腺癌的关系[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 102-106.
[2] 张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕. 北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[3] 刘丽, 贾小慧, 刘艳, 沈晓佳, 周谦, 张海洋, 向丽佳, 温晓滨, 周元琳, 许婉婷, 杨磊, 李磊, 王林, 唐义蓉. 2017—2022年成都市儿童流行性感冒流行特征及儿童早期预警评分对病情严重程度的预测[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 235-241.
[4] 张雯, 徐宏燕, 张彦春, 刘凯波. 2017—2021年北京市先天性心脏病流行病学资料分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 61-68.
[5] 张海森, 叶金宝, 高鹏飞. 胆囊息肉流行病学调查及其进展影响因素分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 91-95.
[6] 徐昌林, 程浩, 刘从国, 高涢, 李毅, 乔媛媛, 陈晟. Rosa定位钻孔血肿清除术与经验性定位颅骨钻孔血肿清除术治疗自发性脑出血的疗效对比分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 97-101.
[7] 李俸鑫, 许建文, 陈如玉, 李常秋, 王继羚, 谭秀伟, 卜海峰, 王海霖, 苏义基. 2015至2020年广西医科大学第一附属医院老年脊髓损伤的特征分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 45-50.
[8] 王伊帆, 陈燕, 彭劲民, 杜斌, 翁利. 中国脓毒症流行病学的研究进展[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 89-94.
[9] 谭可, 李锦平, 彭玉涛, 吴文汧, 杨子文, 汪阳, 陶立波, 刘畅. 机器人辅助立体定向血肿引流术治疗自发性脑出血疗效及卫生经济学评价[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 205-214.
[10] 吉茜茜, 田尧, 马林, 钱进. 红细胞分布宽度-白蛋白比值联合BISAP评分对急性胰腺炎严重程度及死亡率的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 433-438.
[11] 李达, 张大涯, 陈润祥, 张晓冬, 黄士美, 陈晨, 曾凡, 陈世锔, 白飞虎. 海南省东方市幽门螺杆菌感染现状的调查与相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 858-864.
[12] 韩珂, 王祥耀, 茹楠, 牛晓彤, 向京元, 王妍, 高飞, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 肥胖成人慢性腹泻患病率的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 115-120.
[13] 陈升鑫, 翟亚奇, 卜保国, 陈德鑫, 吴浪, 方开萱, 刘文静, 李明阳, 令狐恩强. 自身免疫性胰腺炎临床特征分析[J]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2023, 10(01): 46-51.
[14] 章楠, 盛雪立, 邵俊, 方诗园, 王芳, 朱娴, 周斌捷. 院前恢复自主循环的院外心脏骤停患者流行病学研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 326-330.
[15] 中国医师协会外科医师分会肥胖和糖尿病外科医师委员会, 中国肥胖代谢外科研究协作组. 中国肥胖代谢外科数据库:2022年度报告[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 83-91.
阅读次数
全文


摘要