切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 05 ›› Issue (02) : 97 -100. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2019.02.008

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

经翼点入路与经眶上外侧入路颅内前循环动脉瘤夹闭术的疗效比较
张家瑞1, 郑全乐1,(), 李春虎1, 周顺义1, 张同乐1   
  1. 1. 065000 廊坊,廊坊爱德堡医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-18 出版日期:2019-04-15
  • 通信作者: 郑全乐

Comparison of the efficacy between pterional approach and transsupraorbital lateral approach for anterior intracranial circulation aneurysm clipping

Jiarui Zhang1, Quanle Zheng1,(), Chunhu Li1, Shunyi Zhou1, Tongle Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Aidebao Hospital, Langfang 065000, China
  • Received:2018-12-18 Published:2019-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Quanle Zheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zheng Quanle, Email:
引用本文:

张家瑞, 郑全乐, 李春虎, 周顺义, 张同乐. 经翼点入路与经眶上外侧入路颅内前循环动脉瘤夹闭术的疗效比较[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2019, 05(02): 97-100.

Jiarui Zhang, Quanle Zheng, Chunhu Li, Shunyi Zhou, Tongle Zhang. Comparison of the efficacy between pterional approach and transsupraorbital lateral approach for anterior intracranial circulation aneurysm clipping[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 05(02): 97-100.

目的

研究经翼点入路与经眶上外侧入路动脉瘤夹闭术治疗颅内前循环动脉瘤的疗效对比。

方法

选取廊坊爱德堡医院神经外科自2016年2月至2018年5月收治的颅内前循环动脉瘤患者50例,其中经眶上外侧入路手术为研究组(25例),经翼点入路手术为对照组(25例),比较2组患者临床指标、手术前后血清脑损伤因子NSE与S100β水平的变化、不良反应发生率及GOS评分。

结果

与对照组比较,研究组切口长度小,手术与住院时间短,术中出血量少,骨窗范围小且骨窗缺损度低,患者住院时间短,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组比较,研究组术后的NSE与S100β水平较低,各临床指标改善显著,GOS评分较高,不良反应发生率低,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

颅内前循环动脉瘤患者采用眶上外侧入路可以降低不良反应发生率,改善患者的预后效果,提高生存质量。

Objective

To compare the efficacy of pterional approach and supraorbital lateral approach in the treatment of intracranial anterior circulation aneurysms.

Methods

Fifty patients with intracranial circulation aneurysms were selected in Aidebao Hospital from February 2016 to May 2018. Twenty-five cases were in supraorbital lateral approach group as research group, another 25 cases were in pterion approach surgery group as the control group. The clinical indicators, the changes of serum NSE and S100 levels before and after surgery, the incidence of adverse reactions and GOS scores were evaluated between the two groups.

Results

Compared with the control group, the study group had shorter incision length, shorter operation and hospitalization time, less intraoperative bleeding, smaller scope of bone window and lower defect of bone window, shorter hospitalization time, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the levels of NSE and S100β in the study group were lower, the clinical indicators improved significantly, the GOS score was higher, the incidence of adverse reactions was lower, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Supraorbital lateral approach can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, improve the prognosis and quality of life in patients with intracranial anterior circulation aneurysms.

表1 2组临床指标对比(±s
表2 2组血清脑损伤因子NSE与S100β水平对比(±s,μg/L)
表3 2组患者GOS预后评分比较[例(%)]
表4 2组患者不良反应发生率对比[例(%)]
[1]
Chen Z, Sun X, Lu T, et al. Comparison between modified lateral supraorbital approach and pterional approach in the surgical treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms[J]. Chin J Neurosurg, 2018, 4(1): 1-6.
[2]
Wang J, Wu J, Cao Y, et al. Comparison between frontolateral approach and pterional approach in the surgical treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2018, 52: 80-87.
[3]
陈鑫璞,翟广,刘献志,等.个体化手术入路夹闭颅内前循环动脉瘤[J].临床神经外科杂志, 2014, 11(1): 49-50, 54.
[4]
陈罡,陈正楼,尤万春,等.眶上外侧入路在颅内前循环动脉瘤破裂急性期显微手术中的应用[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2013, 12(9): 950-952.
[5]
曾强军,杨清,周明森,等.早期开颅手术夹闭颅内前循环动脉瘤[J].华西医学, 2010, 25(7): 1276-1278.
[6]
李钢.创伤性假性动脉瘤手术夹闭[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2017, 3(6): 379-380.
[7]
Lan Q, Zhang H, Zhu Q, et al. Keyhole approach for clipping intracranial aneurysm: comparison of supraorbital and pterional keyhole approach[J]. World Neurosurgery, 2017, 102: 350-359.
[8]
Choi YJ, Son W, Park KS, et al. Intradural procedural time to assess technical difficulty of superciliary keyhole and pterional approaches for unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2016, 59(6): 564-569.
[9]
Ahn JY, Kim ST, Yi KC, et al. Superficial temporal artery-sparing mini-pterional approach for cerebral aneurysm surgery[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2017, 60(1): 8-14.
[10]
Tayebi Meybodi A, Benet A, Rodriguez Rubio R, et al. Comprehensive anatomic assessment of the pterional, orbitopterional, and orbitozygomatic approaches for basilar apex aneurysm clipping[J]. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown), 2018, 15(5): 538-550.
[11]
Zheng K, Zhao B, Tan XX, et al. Comparison of aggressive surgical treatment and palliative treatment in elderly patients with poor-grade intracranial aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 5818937.
[12]
高歌,张扬,晁迎九,等.眶上外侧入路显微手术夹闭颅内前循环动脉瘤[J].安徽医科大学学报, 2016, 51(9): 1381-1383.
[13]
邢振义,孙来广,郑杰,等.眶上外侧入路治疗前循环动脉瘤临床分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2018, 21(5): 507-510.
[14]
刘海巍,陶胜忠,陈辉,等.不同入路夹闭前循环动脉瘤的临床疗效分析[J].重庆医学, 2017, 46(28): 3928-3930.
[15]
蒋震伟,张翔,许文辉,等.术中动脉瘤破裂的危险因素分析与经眶上外侧入路中的处理特点[J].脑与神经疾病杂志, 2017, 25(12): 761-764.
[1] 李晓东. 翼点锁孔入路夹闭前循环动脉瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(04): 255-256.
[2] 曾坚锋, 何安邦, 周奋, 李钢. 右侧翼点入路夹闭双侧大脑中动脉镜像动脉瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2019, 05(05): 318-320.
[3] 刘定军. 基层医院颅脑外伤扩大翼点入路颞浅动脉保护的体会[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2017, 03(04): 232-233.
[4] 胡俊亭, 李志立. 经翼点入路微创治疗眼动脉段动脉瘤的效果分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(02): 90-93.
[5] 胡俊亭, 李志立. 眶上外入路联合腰大池引流与翼点入路治疗急性期前循环动脉瘤破裂伴发脑积水的临床对比分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(02): 82-85.
[6] 周顺义, 郑全乐, 张家瑞, 李春虎, 尹雅丽, 张同乐. 经眶上外侧入路与经翼点入路治疗前循环动脉瘤破裂的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2020, 10(01): 34-37.
[7] 郑全乐, 赵浩, 张家瑞, 李春虎, 周顺义, 张同乐. 眶上外侧入路与翼点入路手术治疗急性期颅内前循环破裂动脉瘤的临床对比分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(04): 218-221.
[8] 李文德, 陈立华. 前床突脑膜瘤的显微手术治疗[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 09(01): 60-62.
[9] 张洪钿, 刘建明. 经翼点入路夹闭基底动脉顶端动脉瘤[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(01): 61-63.
阅读次数
全文


摘要