To investigate the operation and superiority of ultra-early minimally invasive puncture and drainage in the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia.

One hundred and sixty patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage were enrolled in our hospital during from October 2011 to October 2016. The clinical data were complete and the patients were informed and informed consent. The patients were divided into eight groups by random number table. Two groups of patients were treated with ultra-early minimally invasive puncture and drainage, in which the hard channel group to take a hard channel puncture approach, soft channel group to take a soft channel puncture approach. The clinical outcomes, adverse reactions, neurological deficit scores, and daily living ability scores were observed and recorded in both groups. Statistical analysis was performed.

There was no significant difference in the total effective rate and the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). There was significant difference between the two groups in the neurological deficit score and the daily life ability score (P<0.05), But there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

Ultra-early minimally invasive puncture and drainage can be used to treat patients with cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia, whether it is soft channel approach or hard channel approach, which can achieve better results, obvious curative effect, high safety and can improve neurological deficit Symptoms and daily living ability, it is worth learning.