Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition) ›› 2016, Vol. 02 ›› Issue (04): 202-205. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2016.04.003

Special Issue:

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The curative effect analysis of subdural effusion treated with bandage secondary to decompressive craniectomy performed in patients with traumatic brain injury

Xihong Xing1, Youkun Dong1, Zhigang Liao1, Hanjiang Cui1, Hongliu Wang1, Aiming Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, The Second People’s Hospital of Jingzhou, Jingzhou 434000, China
  • Received:2016-02-19 Online:2016-08-15 Published:2016-08-15
  • Contact: Aiming Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Aiming, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To observe the curative effect of subdural effusion treated and prevented with bandage secondary to decompressive craniectomy performed in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Method

55 cases of traumatic brain injury were undergone decompressive craniectomy from September 2009 to April 2015 in department of neurosurgery of the second people’s hospital of Jingzhou, and those cases were randomly divided into bone window compression bandage group(n=26) and normal group (n=29). Analysis the difference of the incidence of subdural effusion, the occurrence time and postoperative GOS score between two groups. And observation the curative effective of subdural effusion treated with bone window compressive bandage.

Results

The incidence of subdural effusion post decompressive craniectomy is 7.7%(2/26) in bandage group, 27.6%(8/29) in normal group, the average appear time of subdural effusion post decompressive craniectomy in bandage group (38.5±3.7) d is longer than normal group(13±2.9) d, there are significant differences between two groups(P<0.05). The number of GOS score >3 was 18(69.2%) in bandage group, 21(73.2%) in normal group, there is no significant difference between two groups(P>0.05). After average 23.9 d bandage treatment, the subdural effusion of 10 cases were absorbed disappear, there was no case needed operation.

Conclusion

Bone window compression bandage after decompressive craniectomy performed in patients with traumatic brain injury can obviously reduce the incidence of subdural effusion, and it played an import role in preventing and treating the subdural effusion. This method is simple, safe, and effective, and it is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Traumatic brain injury, Decompressive craniectomy, Subdural effusion, Prevention, Treatment

京ICP 备07035254号-20
Copyright © Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-64229160 E-mail: zhsjcswk2015@163.com
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd