| [1] |
Mehta VA, Spears CA, Abdelgadir J, et al. Management of unruptured incidentally found intracranial saccular aneurysms[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2021, 44(4): 1933-1941. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01407-y.
|
| [2] |
Kim MJ, Chung J, Park KY, et al. Endovascular treatment for large (> 10 mm) basilar tip aneurysms: a retrospective case series[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2022, 164(5): 1239-1245. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05175-0.
|
| [3] |
Wang Y, Cheng M, Liu S, et al. Shape related features of intracranial aneurysm are associated with rupture status in a large Chinese cohort[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022, 14(3): 252-256. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017452.
|
| [4] |
Rinaldo L, Nesvick CL, Rabinstein AA, et al. Differences in size between unruptured and ruptured saccular intracranial aneurysms by location[J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 133: e828-e834. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.027.
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Ha SW, Choi PK, Oh JE, et al. Asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the older people[J]. Eur Geriatr Med, 2019, 10(1): 119-127. DOI: 10.1007/s41999-018-0122-7.
|
| [7] |
Xin WQ, Sun PJ, Li F, et al. Risk factors involved in the formation of multiple intracranial aneurysms[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2020, 198: 106172. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106172.
|
| [8] |
Yu T, Jiang H, Fan Y, et al. The association of CDKN2BAS gene polymorphisms and intracranial aneurysm: a meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(49): e23209. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000023209.
|
| [9] |
Xu F, Xu B, Huang L, et al. Surgical treatment of large or giant fusiform middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a case series[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 115: e252-e262. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.031.
|
| [10] |
Dengler J, Rüfenacht D, Meyer B, et al. Giant intracranial aneurysms: natural history and 1-year case fatality after endovascular or surgical treatment[J]. J Neurosurg, 2021, 134(1): 49-57. DOI: 10.3171/2019.8.Jns183078.
|
| [11] |
Chlorogiannis DD, Aloizou AM, Chlorogiannis A, et al. Exploring the latest findings on endovascular treatments for giant aneurysms: a review[J]. Rev Neurosci, 2024, 35(4): 451-461. DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2023-0082.
|
| [12] |
Kandemirli SG, Baltacioglu F, Jesser J, et al. Flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) with or without adjunctive coiling in treatment of very large and giant cerebral aneurysms[J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2022, 32(2): 471-480. DOI: 10.1007/s00062-021-01061-x.
|
| [13] |
Campos JK, Ball BZ, Cheaney Ii B, et al. Multimodal management of giant cerebral aneurysms: review of literature and case presentation[J]. Stroke Vasc Neurol, 2020, 5(1): 22-28. DOI: 10.1136/svn-2019-000304.
|
| [14] |
Martinez-Perez R, Tsimpas A, Joswig H, et al. Extradural minipterional approach for giant intracranial aneurysms[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2020, 11: 382. DOI: 10.25259/sni_368_2020.
|
| [15] |
Abdel-Tawab M, Abdeltawab AK, Abdelmonem M, et al. Efficacy and safety of flow diverters in posterior circulation aneurysms and comparison with their efficacy in anterior circulation aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2021, 27(5): 609-621. DOI: 10.1177/15910199211003017.
|
| [16] |
Pumar JM, Mosqueira A, Olier J, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the new silk vista flow diverter: safety outcomes at short-term follow-up[J]. Front Neurol, 2021, 12: 713389. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.713389.
|
| [17] |
Jee TK, Yeon JY, Kim KH, et al. Early clinical experience of using the Surpass Evolve flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms[J]. Neuroradiology, 2022, 64(2): 343-351 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02793-w.
|
| [18] |
Suzuki R, Takigawa T, Nariai Y, et al. Comparison of pipeline embolization and coil embolization for the treatment of large unruptured paraclinoid aneurysms[J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2022, 62(2): 97-104. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2021-0242.
|
| [19] |
Kawamoto S, Ozaki T, Asai K, et al. Treatment outcomes of PED for unruptured aneurysms of internal carotid artery: comparison of PED-Flex and PED-Shield[J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2024, 64(8): 316-322. DOI: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0034.
|
| [20] |
Liang X, Tong X, Xue X, et al. Comparison of pipeline embolization device and tubridge flow diverter for posterior circulation aneurysms: a multicentre propensity score matched study[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(6): e27410. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27410.
|
| [21] |
Field NC, Custozzo A, Gajjar AA, et al. Comparison of pipeline embolization device, flow re-direction endoluminal device and surpass flow diverters in the treatment of intracerebral aneurysms[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2023, Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1177/15910199231196621.
|
| [22] |
Fukuda H, Hyohdoh Y, Kawada K, et al. Risk factors of short-term poor functional outcomes and long-term durability of ruptured large or giant intracranial aneurysms[J]. J Neurosurg, 2025, 142(6): 1776-1785. DOI: 10.3171/2024.8.Jns24894.
|
| [23] |
Thompson BG, Brown RD Jr, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. Guidelines for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J]. Stroke, 2015, 46(8): 2368-2400. DOI: 10.1161/str.0000000000000070.
|
| [24] |
Bae HJ, Park YK, Cho DY, et al. Predictors of the effects of flow diversion in very large and giant aneurysms[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2021, 42(6): 1099-1103. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7085
|
| [25] |
Kim S, Park KY, Chung J, et al. Comparative analysis of feasibility of the retrograde suction decompression technique for microsurgical treatment of large and giant internal carotid artery aneurysms[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2021, 64(5): 740-750. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0066.
|
| [26] |
Arrese I, García-García S, Cepeda S, et al. Integrating endovascular techniques into established open neurosurgery practice: a temporal analysis of treatment evolution in a dual-trained neurosurgical unit[J]. Neurocirugia (Engl Ed), 2024, 35(6): 281-288. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucie.2024.06.003.
|
| [27] |
Griessenauer CJ, Enriquez-Marulanda A, Taussky P, et al. Experience with the pipeline embolization device for posterior circulations aneurysms: a multicenter cohort study[J]. Neurosurgery, 2020, 87(6): 1252-1261. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa277.
|
| [28] |
Wang Z, Tian Z, Li W, et al. Variation of mass effect after using a flow diverter with adjunctive coil embolization for symptomatic unruptured large and giant intracranial aneurysms[J]. Front Neurol, 2019, 10: 1191. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01191.
|
| [29] |
Wang C, Luo B, Li T, et al. Comparison of the pipeline embolisation device alone or combined with coiling for treatment of different sizes of intracranial aneurysms[J]. Stroke Vasc Neurol, 2022, 7(4): 345-352. DOI: 10.1136/svn-2021-001258.
|
| [30] |
Fujii T, Teranishi K, Yatomi K, et al. Long-term follow-up results after flow diverter therapy using the pipeline embolization device for large or giant unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms: single-center retrospective analysis in the Japanese population[J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2022, 62(1): 19-27. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2021-0203.
|
| [31] |
Mut F, Cebral JR. Effects of flow-diverting device oversizing on hemodynamics alteration in cerebral aneurysms[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2012, 33(10): 2010-2016. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3080.
|
| [32] |
Ravindran K, Salem MM, Alturki AY, et al. Endothelialization following flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2019, 40(2): 295-301. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5955.
|
| [33] |
Wang J, Jia L, Duan Z, et al. Endovascular treatment of large or giant non-saccular vertebrobasilar aneurysms: pipeline embolization devices versus conventional stents[J]. Front Neurosci, 2019, 13: 1253. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.01253.
|
| [34] |
Batista S, Ferreira MY, Brenner LBO, et al. Surgical clipping and endovascular treatments for small or very small anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a comparative pooled analysis[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2024, 127: 110766. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110766.
|
| [35] |
Calvanese F, Auricchio AM, Pohjola A, et al. Changes in treatment of intracranial aneurysms during the last decade in a large european neurovascular center[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2024, 166(1): 173. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06064-4.
|
| [36] |
Hanel RA, Cortez GM, Lopes DK, et al. Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device (PREMIER study): 3-year results with the application of a flow diverter specific occlusion classification[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2023, 15(3): 248-254. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018501.
|
| [37] |
Lu Z, Li S, Tang H, et al. Effect of proximal parent artery stenosis on the outcomes of posterior communicating artery aneurysms: a preliminary study based on case-specific hemodynamic analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2022, 164: e349-e357. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.101.
|
| [38] |
Yao Y, Tong X, Mei Y, et al. Hemodynamic indicators of the formation of tandem intracranial aneurysm based on a vascular restoration algorithm[J]. Front Neurol, 2022, 13: 1010777. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1010777.
|
| [39] |
Liang F, Zhang Y, Yan P, et al. Predictors of periprocedural complications and angiographic outcomes of endovascular therapy for large and giant intracranial posterior circulation aneurysms[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 125: e378-e384. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.080.
|
| [40] |
Hussein AE, Brunozzi D, Shakur SF, et al. Cerebral aneurysm size and distal intracranial hemodynamics: An assessment of flow and pulsatility index using quantitative magnetic resonance angiography [J]. Neurosurgery, 2018, 83(4): 660-665. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx441.
|