切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 173 -179. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2026.03.005

临床研究

急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术前血清ox-LDL、caveolin-1、Nogo-A水平对术后并发脑水肿的诊断价值分析
朱勇军(), 张东, 侯德文   
  1. 629000 四川遂宁,遂宁市中医医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-07 出版日期:2026-06-15
  • 通信作者: 朱勇军

Analysis of the diagnostic value of serum ox-LDL, caveolin-1, Nogo-A for postoperative cerebral edema in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage before minimally invasive interventional hematoma removal

Yongjun Zhu(), Dong Zhang, Dewen Hou   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Suining Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Suining 629000, China
  • Received:2025-03-07 Published:2026-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Yongjun Zhu
引用本文:

朱勇军, 张东, 侯德文. 急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术前血清ox-LDL、caveolin-1、Nogo-A水平对术后并发脑水肿的诊断价值分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(03): 173-179.

Yongjun Zhu, Dong Zhang, Dewen Hou. Analysis of the diagnostic value of serum ox-LDL, caveolin-1, Nogo-A for postoperative cerebral edema in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage before minimally invasive interventional hematoma removal[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 12(03): 173-179.

目的

探讨急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术前血清氧化修饰低密度脂蛋白(ox-LDL)、陷窝蛋白-1(caveolin-1)及轴突生长抑制因子(Nogo-A)对术后并发脑水肿的诊断价值。

方法

选取遂宁市中医医院神经外科自2023年1月至2024年1月接受微创介入血肿清除术的急性脑出血患者105例,依据术后48 h是否并发脑水肿分为脑水肿组与无脑水肿组。比较2组患者一般资料、术前ox-LDL、caveolin-1及Nogo-A水平;采用多因素Logistic回归分析筛选急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术后并发脑水肿的影响因素;绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估术前ox-LDL、caveolin-1、Nogo-A水平对急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术后并发脑水肿的诊断效能。

结果

105例患者中,35例术后发生脑水肿(脑水肿组),发生率为33.33%,余70例为无脑水肿组。脑水肿组患者ox-LDL水平、caveolin-1阳性及Nogo-A水平均高于无脑水肿组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,术前ox-LDL、caveolin-1阳性及Nogo-A均为急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术后并发脑水肿的独立影响因素(P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,ox-LDL、Nogo-A的截断值分别为0.66 mg/L、138.93 ng/mL,其诊断急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术后并发脑水肿的AUC分别为0.893(95%CI:0.817~0.945)和0.852(95%CI:0.770~0.914);caveolin-1阳性诊断急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术后并发脑水肿的AUC为0.657(95%CI:0.558~0.747);三者联合诊断的AUC为0.950(95%CI:0.889~0.983),高于各指标单独检测,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

术前ox-LDL、caveolin-1、Nogo-A是急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术后并发脑水肿的独立影响因素,三者联合检测对术后脑水肿的预测效能优于各指标单独应用。

Objective

To investigate the diagonstic value of oxo-modified low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL), caveolin-1, and serum axon growth inhibitory factor (Nogo-A) and postoperative cerebral edema in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage before minimally invasive interventional hematoma removal.

Methods

A total of 105 patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage who received minimally invasive interventional hematoma removal at Suining Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2023 to January 2024 were selected and divided into cerebral edema group and non-cerebral edema group according to whether postoperative cerebral edema 48 h after the operation was complicated, and the general data, preoperative ox-LDL, caveolin-1 positive and Nogo-A levels of patients in the two groups were compared. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of cerebral edema after minimally invasive interventional hematoma removal in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of preoperative ox-LDL, caveolin-1, and Nogo-A levels for cerebral edema after minimally invasive interventional hematoma removal in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage.

Results

Among the 105 patients included in the study, 35 cases developed cerebral edema after surgery (cerebral edema group), with an incidence of 33.33%, the remaining 70 cases were in non-cerebral edema group. The levels of ox-LDL, Nogo-A and the positive rate of caveolin-1 in cerebral edema group were higher than those in non-cerebral edema group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative ox-LDL, caveolin-1 positivity, and Nogo-A were independent influencing factors for cerebral edema after minimally invasive interventional hematoma removal in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage (P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the cutoff values of ox-LDL and Nogo-A were 0.66 mg/L and 138.93 ng/mL, respectively. The AUC values for diagnosing cerebral edema after minimally invasive hematoma clearance in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage were 0.893 (95%CI: 0.817-0.945) and 0.852 (95%CI: 0.770-0.914), respectively; the AUC of caveolin-1 positive diagnosis for cerebral edema after minimally invasive hematoma clearance in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage was 0.657 (95%CI: 0.558-0.747); the AUC of the combined diagnosis of the three indicators was 0.950 (95%CI: 0.889-0.983), which was higher than the detection of each indicator separately, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The levels of preoperative ox-LDL, caveolin-1 and Nogo-A are independent influencing factors for cerebral edema after minimally invasive interventional hematoma removal in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage. The combined detection of the three indicators has better predictive efficacy for postoperative cerebral edema than the individual application of each indicator.

表1 2组急性脑出血患者临床资料比较
Tab.1 Comparison of clinical data between two groups of acute cerebral hemorrhage patients
因素 脑水肿组(n=35) 无脑水肿组(n=70) χ2/t P
性别[例(%)]     0.077 0.781
19(54.29) 40(57.14)    
16(45.71) 30(42.86)    
年龄[例(%)]     0.243 0.622
<50岁 9(25.71) 15(21.43)    
≥50岁 26(74.29) 55(78.57)    
吸烟史[例(%)]     0.938 0.333
14(40.00) 35(50.00)    
21(60.00) 35(50.00)    
基础疾病[例(%)]        
高血压 5(14.29) 12(17.14) 0.140 0.708
糖尿病 9(25.71) 15(21.43) 0.243 0.622
冠心病 8(22.86) 13(18.57) 0.268 0.605
高脂血症 4(11.43) 10(14.29) 0.165 0.685
出血位置[例(%)]     0.127 0.938
基底节 14(40.00) 28(40.00)    
丘脑 10(28.57) 22(31.43)    
脑叶 11(31.43) 20(28.57)    
血肿形状[例(%)]     0.686 0.407
规则 16(45.71) 38(54.29)    
不规则 19(54.29) 32(45.71)    
体质量指数[例(%)]     0.226 0.893
<18.5 kg/m2 8(22.86) 19(27.14)    
18.5~24.9 kg/m2 20(57.14) 38(54.29)    
>24.9 kg/m2 7(20.00) 13(18.57)    
发病至手术时间[例(%)]     0.685 0.710
0.5~<1 h 8(22.86) 15(21.43)    
1~2 h 20(57.14) 45(64.29)    
>2 h 7(20.00) 10(14.29)    
手术用时[例(%)]     0.652 0.722
1~<2 h 6(17.14) 10(14.29)    
2~3 h 25(71.43) 48(68.57)    
>3 h 4(11.43) 12(17.14)    
术中出血[例(%)]     0.129 0.720
<50 mL 28(80.00) 58(82.86)    
≥50 mL 7(20.00) 12(17.14)    
血肿引流管[例(%)]     2.360 0.125
27(77.14) 62(88.57)    
8(22.86) 8(11.43)    
术后降压药[例(%)]     1.382 0.240
30(85.71) 65(92.86)    
5(14.29) 5(7.14)    
术后脱水药[例(%)]     0.659 0.417
29(82.86) 62(88.57)    
6(17.14) 8(11.43)    
术前ox-LDL(mg/L,±s 0.78±0.10 0.50±0.07 16.669 <0.001
术前Nogo-A(ng/mL,±s 168.89±23.15 110.23±13.55 16.362 <0.001
术前caveolin-1阳性[例(%)] 20(57.14) 18(24.00) 9.980 0.002
表2 急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术后并发脑水肿的多因素Logistic分析
Tab.2 Multivariate Logistic analysis of cerebral edema after minimally invasive interventional hematoma removal in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage
表3 术前ox-LDL、caveolin-1、Nogo-A对急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术后并发脑水肿的ROC曲线结果
Tab.3 ROC curve results of preoperative ox-LDL, caveolin-1, and Nogo-A single or combined diagnosis for cerebral edema after minimally invasive interventional hematoma removal in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage
图1 术前ox-LDL、caveolin-1阳性及Nogo-A单独及联合诊断急性脑出血患者微创介入血肿清除术后并发脑水肿的ROC曲线ROC:受试者工作特征;ox-LDL:血清氧化修饰低密度脂蛋白;caveolin-1:陷窝蛋白-1;Nogo-A:血清轴突生长抑制因子
Fig.1 ROC curves of preoperative ox-LDL, caveolin-1 positive, Nogo-A single or combined diagnosis for cerebral edema after minimally invasive interventional hematoma removal in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage
[1]
张云,焦黛妍,吴兆华. 血清ICAM-1、MMP-9和Cys-C水平可评估急性脑出血患者的病情和预后[J]. 内科急危重症杂志, 2023, 29(3): 199-202. DOI: 10.11768/nkjwzzzz20230306.
[2]
鲍俊杰,王光胜,耿德勤, 等. 血清CXCL12、CCCK-18水平检测在急性脑出血患者预后评估中的价值[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2023, 18(5): 629-632. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.05.015.
[3]
董西朝,王林林,袁致海, 等. 超早期经脑沟裂入路与经脑回皮质入路显微手术治疗基底节区脑出血的疗效分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(2): 100-105. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2024.02.006.
[4]
李晋如,宋晓杰. 亚低温联合微创穿刺引流术治疗急性脑出血患者的疗效及对血清中枢神经特异性蛋白、白介素-1β和神经元特异性烯醇化酶的影响[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2023, 20(2): 33-36. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2023.02.007.
[5]
李丽媛,殷椿茂,杨帅凯, 等. 老年急性脑梗死患者血清OX-LDL、HSP27水平与脑水肿及短期预后关系[J]. 山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)学报, 2023, 44(2): 125-129. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0005.2023.02.009.
[6]
冷静思,唐媛媛,林灵. 急性脑出血入院时CT脑中线移位和血清CCR5、Nogo-A水平与患者预后的相关性[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2023, 22(18): 1914-1918. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2023.18.004.
[7]
陈孝平,汪建平,赵继宗. 外科学[M]. 9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018: 218-219.
[8]
付伟伟,焦常新,张冠. 血浆Lp-PLA2联合预后营养指数对急性脑出血患者预后的评估价值[J]. 山东医药, 2023, 63(28): 62-65. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2023.28.015.
[9]
满钰霖,魏东,江文. 脑出血后脑水肿药物治疗的研究进展[J]. 临床神经病学杂志, 2022, 35(2): 147-150. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1648.2022.02.013.
[10]
张扬. 微创血肿清除术治疗急性脑出血患者术后颅内感染的危险因素分析[J]. 实用中西医结合临床, 2023, 23(20): 88-91. DOI: 10.13638/j.issn.1671-4040.2023.20.026.
[11]
王亮,董伟,郑炼, 等. 注射体积对老年患者中等量基底节区脑出血微创穿刺术后临床疗效的影响[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2024, 50(5): 268-273. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0152.2024.05.003.
[12]
Mould WA, Carhuapoma JR, Muschelli J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery plus recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation decreases perihematomal edema[J]. Stroke, 2013, 44(3): 627-634. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000411.
[13]
侯玉珂,蔡青猛,刘香君, 等. 氧化型低密度脂蛋白抗体在抗磷脂综合征中的临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1117-1122. DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.06.010.
[14]
刘雪征. 急性脑梗死患者溶栓治疗后发生脑水肿的影响因素[J]. 河南医学研究, 2021, 30(21): 3947-3950. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-437X.2021.21.033.
[15]
陈裕春,朱禛菁. 高血压性脑出血患者微创血肿清除术前血清ox-LDL、25-(OH)-D水平对脑水肿的预测价值[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2023, 20(22): 3319-3323, 3327. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2023.22.013.
[16]
康梅娟,温昌明,张保朝, 等. 血清VILIP-1 CXCL16联合ox-LDL预测急性缺血性脑卒中患者预后不良的价值[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2023, 26(10): 1249-1253. DOI: 10.12083/SYSJ.230466.
[17]
刘帅,赵丽霞,彭焱秋, 等. Caveolin-1的结构及其在骨代谢中的生物学功能[J]. 中国骨质疏松杂志, 2023, 29(11): 1638-1644. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7108.2023.11.015.
[18]
李强,耿正顺,潘迪飞, 等. 自发性基底核区脑出血病人血清小窝蛋白1的表达及其临床意义[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2024, 49(10): 1327-1330. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2024.10.012.
[19]
李崇,毛建辉,罗伟, 等. 高血压深部脑出血神经内镜手术患者血清A-FABP、IL-1β、caveolin-1动态变化及预后预测价值[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2022, 35(4): 83-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2022.04.019.
[20]
王娟,白雪,王廷华, 等. Caveolin-1蛋白及其对血脑屏障通透性改变调节作用研究[J]. 中医药临床杂志, 2023, 35(10): 1876-1882. DOI: 10.16448/j.cjtcm.2023.1006.
[21]
曹亮,崔旭波. 血清Nogo-A、MIP-1α、MIP-1β在高血压脑出血患者中的表达及预后预测价值[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2023, 20(3): 299-302. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2023.03.003.
[22]
李博,王淼,侯智, 等. TIMP-1/MMP-9、HPA、Nogo-A对高血压脑出血病情评估及手术预后预测的价值[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2022, 35(4): 88-93. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2022.04.020.
[1] 苏金铭, 田萍, 李青林, 马静, 宋伟伟, 刘博文, 曹晓莹, 薛玲, 王文军. HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者复发转移的影响因素及风险预测模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 228-235.
[2] 徐敏骅, 方圆, 朱丽均, 杨瑜麟. 女性参加宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查意愿及其影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 22(03): 250-258.
[3] 杨进宝, 李伟, 张冰, 陈健, 王吉哲, 王玉佳, 王顺, 蒋志斌, 周烨, 杨建玲. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形保肛术技术难度的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 343-346.
[4] 张浩然, 王实现, 王凯, 缪骥. SSLA治疗复发性阑尾炎的疗效与手术时间因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 379-383.
[5] 谢华林, 刘宾, 孙倩男, 王道荣. 改善术后肠造口功能研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 398-401.
[6] 李靖思, 张荣华, 刘景磊, 高焕宇, 毛学惠, 石玉龙. 中大型切口疝患者的生活质量及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 155-161.
[7] 杨宁, 张立翱, 李仁君, 金水. 非遗传性结直肠息肉病患者的临床特征及息肉复发的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 168-174.
[8] 王睿, 罗永川, 廖可立, 陈贵军. 老年脑出血患者术后营养不良的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 92-97.
[9] 王麒浩, 李文臣, 陈勃, 王海峰. 胶质淋巴系统在创伤性颅脑损伤病理进程中的研究进展与挑战[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 113-117.
[10] 王清馨, 韩洁, 李雪敏, 朱慧, 颜廷启, 李小杰, 巩巧丽, 郭粉娥. 定量脑电图参数联合SII、CALLY指数对急性缺血性卒中前循环大血管闭塞患者机械取栓术后脑水肿的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 156-162.
[11] 来建梅, 王如海, 邓继祥, 胡海成, 孙菲琳, 杨震, 马鑫梅. 青中年高血压脑出血患者早期神经功能恶化的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 150-155.
[12] 沈燕, 施金金, 陈颖青, 钮文思, 龚恬安. 电解质紊乱与凝血功能异常对轮状病毒肠炎患儿补液治疗失败的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 278-283.
[13] 朱瑶楠, 代俊安, 朱虹, 吴亦淇, 马庆华. 苏州市相城区居民寄生虫病健康素养水平及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 311-319.
[14] 缪佳芮, 万贻丹, 邓碧丽, 张晶晶. 原发性下肢静脉曲张患者治疗意愿及影响因素的质性研究[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(02): 195-200.
[15] 熊玉玲, 吴源, 屈春林, 彭琳琳, 王荣, 赵唯, 周芳婷, 马剑, 李依, 南亚昀. 宁夏南部地区医疗机构就诊老年人群肌少症影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2026, 13(02): 19-26.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?