切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 37 -41. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2021.01.009

所属专题: 文献

脊髓损伤

创伤性颈部脊髓损伤的外科治疗
魏梁锋1, 郑兆聪1,(), 薛亮1, 陈业煌1, 王守森1   
  1. 1. 350025 福州,联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-06 出版日期:2021-02-15
  • 通信作者: 郑兆聪
  • 基金资助:
    福建省科技计划引导性项目(2016Y0070)

Surgical treatment for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury

Liangfeng Wei1, Zhaocong Zheng1,(), Liang Xue1, Yehuang Chen1, Shousen Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, the 900th Hospital of Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou 350025, China
  • Received:2021-01-06 Published:2021-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhaocong Zheng
引用本文:

魏梁锋, 郑兆聪, 薛亮, 陈业煌, 王守森. 创伤性颈部脊髓损伤的外科治疗[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(01): 37-41.

Liangfeng Wei, Zhaocong Zheng, Liang Xue, Yehuang Chen, Shousen Wang. Surgical treatment for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(01): 37-41.

目的

探讨创伤性颈部脊髓损伤的手术治疗方式及其疗效。

方法

回顾性分析联勤保障部队第九〇〇医院神经外科自2014年4月至2019年10月因创伤性颈部脊髓损伤行手术治疗的75例患者的临床资料。采用颈椎前路椎间盘切除减压融合术26例,颈椎前路椎体次全切除减压融合术13例,颈椎后路椎板切除/脊髓内减压+侧块/椎弓根螺钉内固定术29例,颈后路"单开门"式椎管扩大成形术7例。通过术前及术后末次随访的美国脊髓损伤协会脊髓损伤评分(AIS)评估手术疗效。

结果

随访3~31个月,术后末次随访AIS较术前明显改善(Z=-6.992,P<0.001)。术中无大血管、气管、食道损伤及脊髓意外发生。术后死亡2例,脑脊液漏2例,伤口愈合不良3例。无颈椎后凸畸形发生,无内固定物断裂、脱落。

结论

对于急性创伤性颈部脊髓损伤患者,根据脊髓受压来源及范围,及早采取合适的入路与术式进行手术,可取得较好的疗效。

Objective

To investigate the operative method and curative effect of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury.

Methods

A total of 75 hospitalized patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury in Neurosurgery Department of the 900th Hospital of Joint Logistics Team from April 2014 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was performed in 26 cases, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in 13 cases, posterior laminectomy/myelotomy+lateral mass/pedicle screw fixation in 29 cases, and posterior "single door" laminoplasty in 7 cases. The curative effect was evaluated by American Spinal Cord Injury Association impairment scale (AIS) before and at the last follow-up.

Results

All patients were followed up for 3-31 months and the AIS at the last time after operation was significantly improved compared with that before operation (Z=-6.992, P<0.001). No major vessel, trachea, esophagus injury and spinal cord accident occurred during the operation. There were 2 cases of death, 2 cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage and 3 cases of poor wound healing. There was no kyphosis of cervical spine, no fracture or fall off of internal fixation.

Conclusion

For the patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury, according to the source and scope of spinal cord compression, appropriate approach and operation mode should be adopted as soon as possible, which can achieve better curative effect.

表1 2组患者术前及术后末次随访时AIS分级比较[例(%)]
图1 典型患者术前术后影像学表现
[1]
Quarrington RD, Jones CF, Tcherveniakov P, et al. Traumatic subaxial cervical facet subluxation and dislocation: epidemiology, radiographic analyses, and risk factors for spinal cord injury[J]. Spine J, 2018, 18(3): 387-398.
[2]
陈其昕.上颈椎损伤治疗策略的选择[J].中华创伤杂志, 2019, 35(11): 961-965.
[3]
Liu K, Zhang Z. Comparison of a novel anterior-only approach and the conventional posterior-anterior approach for cervical facet dislocation: a retrospective study[J]. Eur Spine J, 2019, 28(10): 2380-2389.
[4]
Han Y, Xia Q, Hu YC, et al. Simultaneously combined anterior-posterior approaches for subaxial cervical circumferential reconstruction in a sitting position[J]. Orthop Surg, 2015, 7(4): 371-374.
[5]
中国康复医学会脊柱脊髓专业委员会. 《新鲜下颈段脊柱脊髓损伤评估与治疗》的专家共识[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2015, 25(4): 378-384.
[6]
张业锋,杨贵华,孔德谦,等.无骨折脱位型颈髓损伤保守与后路手术治疗的比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2019, 27(4): 316-320.
[7]
Furlan JC, Craven BC, Massicotte EM, et al. Early versus delayed surgical decompression of spinal cord after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a cost-utility analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 88: 166-174.
[8]
Hachem LD, Ahuja CS, Fehlings MG. Assessment and management of acute spinal cord injury: from point of injury to rehabilitation[J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2017, 40(6): 665-675.
[9]
Godzik J, Dalton J, Hemphill C, et al. Early surgical intervention among patients with acute central cord syndrome is not associated with higher mortality and morbidity[J]. J Spine Surg, 2019, 5(4): 466-474.
[10]
Badhiwala JH, Wilson JR, Witiw CD, et al. The influence of timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of individual patient data[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2020, 20(2): 117-126.
[11]
Burke JF, Yue JK, Ngwenya LB, et al. Ultra-early (<12 hours) surgery correlates with higher rate of American spinal injury association impairment scale conversion after cervical spinal cord injury[J]. Neurosurgery, 2019, 85(2): 199-203.
[12]
Biglari B, Child C, Yildirim TM, et al. Does surgical treatment within 4 hours after trauma have an influence on neurological remission in patients with acute spinal cord injury?[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2016, 12: 1339-1346.
[13]
Grassner L, Wutte C, Zimmermann G, et al. Influence of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on surgical decision making for patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a survey among experienced spine surgeons[J]. World Neurosurg, 2019, 131: e586-e592.
[14]
魏梁锋,王守森,陈自谦.弥散张量成像技术在脊髓损伤中的应用和进展[J].功能与分子医学影像学杂志(电子版), 2017, 6(1): 1099-1103.
[15]
封亚平.脊髓损伤早期处理[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2016, 16(3): 118-122.
[16]
魏梁锋,王守森,章翔.急性创伤性颈髓损伤的手术治疗[J].中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2017, 16(3): 193-196.
[17]
李治宇.颈椎前后路联合手术治疗颈椎管狭窄并颈椎损伤的效果分析[J].中国伤残医学, 2020, 28(23): 43-44.
[1] 王月香, 朱亚琼, 陈祥慧, 杨静. 序贯教学法在颈椎超声临床教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(06): 548-553.
[2] 康丽, 巩丽焕, 侯晓敏, 郭瑞君, 李硕. 头颈部血管超声在评估突发性聋合并颈椎病中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(08): 806-811.
[3] 张君, 沈素红, 刘春龙, 张志杰. 剪切波弹性成像技术量化评估健康人斜方肌弹性模量的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(03): 307-312.
[4] 廖环, 徐蛟天, 张海涛, 邱光庭, 蒋成昊, 陈进, 邹景芳, 张志文. 颈椎管内外节细胞神经瘤一例报道及文献复习[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 186-189.
[5] 郭协力, 戴伟川, 蔡文华, 方仲宁, 陈英贤, 齐震. 经颈前入路显微镜下椎间盘切除及椎体间植骨融合术[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 379-383.
[6] 陈星宇, 谢嵘. 颅底凹陷的影像学进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 43-48.
[7] 冯妍, 范雁东, 吴金泽, 芒苏尔·努尔麦麦提, 排日哈提·居麦, 罗坤. 扩散张量成像对脊髓型颈椎病预测价值的Meta分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(06): 331-335.
[8] 肖士鹏, 徐帅, 李士春, 云才. T1倾斜角-颈椎前凸角(T1S-CL)在三节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中的意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 558-565.
[9] 刘振华, 岑水忠, 叶伟佳, 李建君, 曾炜波, 靳安民, 邱素均. 传统cage-钛板与颈椎桥形锁定融合器结合颈椎前路减压融合内固定术治疗单节段脊髓型颈椎病的效果比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 213-219.
[10] 卢鹏, 谭涛. 津沽伤科推拿捏穴手法治疗神经根型颈椎病选穴机制探讨[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 71-73.
[11] 赵铎. 针刀治疗颈椎病系列讲座(四)[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2020, 09(03): 0-f3.
[12] 李晨阳, 石陨. 浅析颈椎病的危险因素[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2020, 09(03): 128-130.
[13] 张轩, 李佳. 心理护理联合电针疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病伴焦虑的疗效观察[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2019, 08(03): 96-100.
[14] 史慧娟, 廖骞, 陈珑, 倪才方, 马圆, 陈正文. CT结合C臂透视引导经皮椎体成形术治疗疼痛性颈椎转移癌[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 65-69.
[15] 郑超, 刘俊朋, 杜俊杰, 马炜, 陈渲宇, 伍骥. Keegan型颈椎病的临床诊断学特征[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 132-136.
阅读次数
全文


摘要