切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (01) : 12 -16. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2017.01.004

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折手术治疗的临床研究
何川1, 陈勃1, 赵景伟2, 李文臣1, 付双林1, 王海峰1,()   
  1. 1. 130021 长春,吉林大学第一医院神经创伤外科
    2. 130033 长春,吉林大学中日联谊医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-08 出版日期:2017-02-15
  • 通信作者: 王海峰
  • 基金资助:
    吉林大学第一医院青年基金项目(20140601)

Operation of pediatric depressed skull fracture

Chuan He1, Bo Chen1, Jingwei Zhao2, Wenchen Li1, Shuanglin Fu1, Haifeng Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Traumatic Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
    2. Department of Neurosurgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130033, China
  • Received:2016-11-08 Published:2017-02-15
  • Corresponding author: Haifeng Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Haifeng, Email:
引用本文:

何川, 陈勃, 赵景伟, 李文臣, 付双林, 王海峰. 小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折手术治疗的临床研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2017, 03(01): 12-16.

Chuan He, Bo Chen, Jingwei Zhao, Wenchen Li, Shuanglin Fu, Haifeng Wang. Operation of pediatric depressed skull fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 03(01): 12-16.

目的

探讨钻孔撬复法和骨瓣开颅复位法两种手术方法在小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折手术治疗中的应用。

方法

选取自2013年1月至2015年12月吉林大学第一医院神经创伤外科收治的手术治疗小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折的66例患儿资料。其中,男性患儿42例,女性患儿24例,年龄1个月至13岁(平均年龄3.71岁)。从年龄受伤机制、手术方法的选择、术后恢复情况及随访等方面对小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折的手术治疗进行分析。并比较钻孔撬复法(A组,33例)和骨瓣开颅复位法(B组,33例)两种手术方法在小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折手术治疗中的应用。应用χ2检验及秩和检验进行统计学分析。以P<0.05为差异具有统计学意义。

结果

66例患儿中,受伤机制以坠落伤和车祸伤为主:其中坠落伤18例(27.3%),车祸18例(27.3%)。按年龄不同将所有66例病例分为<1岁、1~6岁和6~13岁组。各组间受伤机制差异有统计学意义(χ2=15.349,P<0.05),坠落伤和打伤在不同年龄段的分布不同,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);<1岁组患儿坠落伤发生率明显高于1~6岁组患儿(P<0.01)。受伤部位以顶部最多,共31例,其次是颞顶11例和额部10例。笔者对钻孔撬复术和骨瓣开颅复位术两种手术方法的选择进行了比较,两组间患儿在性别上差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.262,P=0.609)。A组以2岁以内的患儿为主[中位数(四分位数间距):0.92(2.92)];B组以2岁以上的患儿为主[中位数(四分位数间距):5(4.54)],两组的患儿年龄具有明显差异(Z=-3.849,P<0.001)。实施钻孔撬复法的平均手术时间为40 min,短于实施开颅复位法(平均时间为1.5 h)。

结论

小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折如满足以下条件,即<2岁,受伤时间<2周的,仅仅需要处理骨折,或者仅有少量硬膜外血肿可以从骨孔处清除并且无活动性出血的小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折的患儿,首选钻孔撬复术。

Objective

To investigate the application of two kinds of operation methods, drilling and prising elevation technique and trans-craniotomic elevation technique, in the treatment of the depressed skull fracture of pediatric patients.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated pediatric patients with depressed skull fracture from January 2013 to December 2015 treated by neurosurgery approach in our hospital. There are 66 cases meet standard, male are 42 cases and female are 24 cases, which the ages range from 1 month to 13 years (mean interval: 3.71 years). We evaluated these cases from age, sex, mechanism of injury, location, surgery method and follows. Comparision was made between individuals who were treated by drilling and prising elevation technique (group A, n=33), and those surgically treated by trans-craniotomic elevation technique (group B, n=33). χ2 test and rank-sum test was used in this study. There are significantly different when P<0.05.

Results

In these cases, Fall and traffic accident are two main mechanisms of injury: Fall (18 cases, 27.3%), traffic accident(18 cases, 27.3%). There are significantly deferent in the mechanisms between <1 year group, 1-6 years group and 6-13 years group (χ2=15.349, P<0.05). Fall and violence are significantly deferent between these groups (P<0.01); the population of fall in the <1 year group is significant more than 1~6 years group(P<0.01). Parietal bone is the highest rate of injuries location (31 cases), the other two high rate of injuries location are temporal bone and frontal bone. There is no deferent in sex between group A (drilling and prising elevation technique) and group B (trans-craniotomic elevation technique) (χ2=2.262, P=0.609). The age at the time of evaluation was significantly younger in A group(Median(IQR): 0.92(2.92) years, P<0.001) compared with B group (Median(IQR): 5(4.54) years).

Conclusion

The drilling and prising elevation technique is recommended for the depressed skull fracture of pediatric patients younger than 2 years old and injury short than 2 weeks, who are simple depressed skul fractures or complicated with less significant epidural hematoma.

表1 小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折患儿的基本资料
图1 小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折行钻孔撬复术的典型患儿资料
图2 小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折行骨瓣开颅复位术的典型患儿资料
[1]
Bonfield CM, Naran S, Adetayo OA, et al. Pediatric skull fractures: the need for surgical intervention, characteristics, complications, and outcomes[J]. J Neurosurg Pediatr, 2014, 14(2): 205-211.
[2]
周全孝,范东,范成功,等.手术治疗儿童期颅骨凹陷骨折103例分析[J].宁夏医学杂志, 2000, 22(2): 92.
[3]
Ersahin Y, Mutluer S, Mirzai H, et al. Pediatric depressed skull fractures: analysis of 530 cases[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 1996, 12(6): 323-331.
[4]
Addioui A, Saint-Vil D, Crevier L, et al. Management of skull fractrures in children less than 1 year of age[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2016, 51(7): 1146-1150.
[5]
Blackwood BP, Bean JF, Sadecki-Lund C, et al. Observation for isolated traumatic skull fractures in the pediatric population: unnecessary and costly[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2016, 51(4): 654-658.
[6]
Hoppe IC, Kordahi AM, Paik AM, et al. Age and sex-related differences in 431 pediatric facial fractures at a level 1 trauma center[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2014, 42(7): 1408-1411.
[7]
Yi W, Liu R, Chen J, et al. Trauma infant neurologic score predicts the outcome of traumatic brain injury in infants[J]. Pediatr Neurosurg, 2010, 46(4): 259-266.
[8]
Reilly PL, Simpson DA, Sprod R, et al. Assessing the conscious level in infants and young children: a paediatric version of the glasgow coma scale[J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 1988, 4(1): 30-33.
[9]
Yager JY, Johnston B, Seshia SS. Coma scales in pediatric practice[J]. Am J Dis Child, 1990, 144(10): 1088-1091.
[10]
燕武,外力·艾比布力.小切口撬拨整复术治疗小儿颅骨凹陷性骨折[J].新疆医科大学学报, 2012, 35(5): 653-654.
[11]
徐勤伟,张明然,徐宝伟,等.颅骨凹陷骨折颅骨整复器的应用[J].创伤外科杂志, 2001, 3(1): 51.
[12]
Zalatimo O, Ranasinghe M, Dias M, et al. Treatment of depressed skull fractures in neonates using percutaneous microscrew elevation[J]. J Neurosurg Pediatr, 2012, 9(6): 676-679.
[13]
Haug RH, Foss J. Maxillofacial injuries in the pediatric patient[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2000, 90(2): 126-134.
[14]
AL Shetawi AH, Lim CA, Singh YK, et al. Pediatric maxillofacial trauma: a review of 156 patients[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 74(7): 1420.e1-4.
[15]
刘飞,廖达光,刘亮,等.小儿颅骨开放性凹陷骨折治疗方法的探讨[J].临床小儿外科杂志, 2005, 4(5): 339-341.
[16]
Steinbok P, Flodmark O, Martens D, et al. Management of simple depressed skull fractures in children[J]. J Neurosurg, 1987, 66(4): 506-510.
[1] 邵苗苗, 程青, 李英, 关玮伟, 胡利华, 王晓玲. 患儿腹部手术后常用药物配伍小儿电解质补给注射液的稳定性研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 731-738.
[2] 杨姣, 王玲, 李娜, 陈丹丹, 胡大海, 韩军涛. 艾司氯胺酮复合麻醉在小儿瘢痕非插管全身麻醉患者超脉冲点阵二氧化碳激光治疗术中的应用及效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(02): 119-125.
[3] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[4] 贺翔, 杨科, 曹义国, 陈贵恒. 腹腔镜治疗小儿鞘膜积液的研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 526-528.
[5] 朱明, 童国煜, 赵海腾, 钟量, 邹翔宇, 吴少峰, 张轶男. 腹腔镜在减少儿童隐匿性腹股沟斜疝与鞘膜积液二次手术的意义[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 457-460.
[6] 吴少峰, 张轶男, 孙杰. 机器人辅助手术在儿童微创泌尿手术中的应用和展望[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 440-444.
[7] 曹耀戈, 蒋丽, 张坤, 王翠红, 李靖. 不同护理模式在小儿腹股沟疝行腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术的效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 115-118.
[8] 曹伟, 李艳玲, 李亚辉, 张文化. 蓝芩口服液联合重组人干扰素α-2b喷雾治疗急性期小儿疱疹性咽峡炎的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 221-223.
[9] 夏雪霞, 张黎雯, 任明星. 疏清颗粒联合阿奇霉素治疗小儿肺炎支原体感染的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 548-550.
[10] 王雷, 华山, 陆振. 布地奈德与头孢哌酮舒巴坦钠对小儿重症肺炎的疗效分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 536-538.
[11] 谭自明, 罗琼, 张美, 王君. 小儿病毒性脑炎并发肺部感染的病原菌及耐药性分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(03): 394-396.
[12] 黄泽辉, 梁杰贤, 曾伟. 右美托咪定联合艾司氯胺酮在小儿无痛胃镜检查中的应用研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 510-513.
[13] 卢贤红, 钱石陆, 周敏. 微生态调节剂对小儿轮状病毒性肠炎的临床干预效果分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 245-249.
[14] 李秋琼, 薛静, 王敏, 陈芬, 肖美芳. NSE、SIL-2R、TNF-α检测对小儿病毒性脑膜炎与细菌性脑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 303-307.
[15] 刘宇, 王宁, 李丹, 张波. 益生菌辅助治疗小儿支气管肺炎相关腹泻及其对肠道菌群改善的效果[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 410-414.
阅读次数
全文


摘要