切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华神经创伤外科电子杂志

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 137 -140. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2021.03.003

颅脑与脊髓损伤

日均发热次数对颅脑损伤伤情影响的临床意义
武秀权1, 张磊1, 吴霜1, 郇宇1, 何鑫1, 鱼洋1, 杜伟1, 郭庆东1, 费舟1, 蒋晓帆1,†()   
  1. 1. 710032　西安，空军军医大学第一附属医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-04 出版日期:2021-06-15
  • 通信作者: 蒋晓帆
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81871023)

Clinical significance of daily fever frequency on traumatic brain injury

Xiuquan Wu1, Lei Zhang1, Shuang Wu1, Yu Huan1, Xin He1, Yang Yu1, Wei Du1, Qingdong Guo1, Zhou Fei1, Xiaofan Jiang1,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
  • Received:2020-03-04 Published:2021-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Xiaofan Jiang
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

武秀权, 张磊, 吴霜, 郇宇, 何鑫, 鱼洋, 杜伟, 郭庆东, 费舟, 蒋晓帆. 日均发热次数对颅脑损伤伤情影响的临床意义[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 137-140.

Xiuquan Wu, Lei Zhang, Shuang Wu, Yu Huan, Xin He, Yang Yu, Wei Du, Qingdong Guo, Zhou Fei, Xiaofan Jiang. Clinical significance of daily fever frequency on traumatic brain injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(03): 137-140.

目的

探讨颅脑损伤（TBI）患者日均发热次数与其早期伤情改变的关系。

方法

回顾性分析空军军医大学第一附属医院神经外科重症监护室自2013年10月至2019年6月收治的469例TBI患者的临床资料。根据患者出院时的GOS评分将其分为预后良好组（GOS>3分）和预后不良组（GOS≤3分）。统计患者住院期间日均发热次数、年龄、入院GCS评分、伤因等。采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析法分析影响伤情加重的风险因素，通过绘制受试者工作曲线（ROC）评价伤情加重危险因素的诊断效能，并进一步分析患者发热的原因。

结果

预后不良组319例，预后良好组150例。单因素分析显示，年龄、入院GCS评分、伤因及日均发热次数与TBI伤情变化的影响因素（均P<0.01）。多因素Logistic回归分析显示，年龄、入院GCS评分及日均发热次数是改变TBI患者早期伤情的独立风险因素，ROC曲线提示日均发热次数具备一定的诊断效能，进一步分析显示，肺部感染可使日均发热次数增多，是加重伤情的重要因素之一。

结论

初步推断日均发热次数是TBI患者伤情加重的危险因素之一，可作为一种无创简便的监测手段判断伤情改变。

关键词: 颅脑损伤, 发热, 二次脑损伤, 影响因素
Objective

To explore the relationship between daily fever frequency and early injury changes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods

Four hundred and sixty-nine patients with TBI treated in Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit of the First Affiliated Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University from October 2013 to June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the GOS scores at the time of discharge, the patients were divided into two groups: the good prognosis group (GOS>3) and the poor prognosis group (GOS≤3). The daily fever frequency, ages, admission GCS and injury causes during hospitalization were collected. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors causing aggravating injury, and the diagnostic efficacy of aggravating risk factors was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The causes of fever were further analyzed.

Results

Three hundred and nineteen patients had a poor early prognosis and 150 had a good early prognosis. Univariate analysis showed that age, admission GCS score, causes of injury and daily fever frequency may be the influencing factors of the aggravating injury with TBI (P<0.01). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that age, admission GCS score and the daily fever frequency were independent risk factors to change the early injury of TBI patients. ROC curve showed that daily fever frequency had diagnostic efficacy. Further analysis showed that pulmonary infection could increase daily fever frequency, which was one of the most important factors aggravating injury.

Conclusion

It is concluded that the daily fever frequency is one risk factor aggravating injury and it can be used as a non-invasive and simple monitoring method to judge the injury changes.

Key words: Traumatic brain injury, Fever, Secondary brain injury, Influence factor
表1 2组颅脑损伤患者的临床资料比较
临床因素 预后不良组(n=319) 预后良好组(n=150) χ2/t/U值 P值
年龄（±s，岁） 48.6±17.0 40.7±15.0 4.875 <0.001
性别（男/女） 271/48 127/23 0.113 0.933
入院GCS评分（±s，分） 5.5±2.3 9.4±3.5 -12.239 <0.001
致伤因素[例(%)]     17.503 <0.001
  车祸伤 139(43.5) 51(34.0)    
  坠落伤 79(24.7) 22(14.6)    
  其他 101(31.8) 77(51.4)    
入院平均动脉压（±s，mmHg） 97.6±13.6 94.7±11.5 2.389 0.018
住院时长[M(P25，P75)，d] 13(7,23) 11(8,16) 2.017 0.041
日均发热次数[M(P25，P75)，次] 0.9(0.3,2.3) 0.4(0.1,0.8) 5.749 <0.001
表2 影响颅脑损伤患者早期伤情加重的多因素Logistic回归分析
临床因素 OR值 95%CI P值
年龄 1.035 1.019～1.051 <0.001
入院GCS评分 0.667 0.609～0.730 <0.001
伤因 1.017 0.991～1.034 0.836
日均发热次数 1.528 1.200～1.946 0.001
图1 独立风险因素影响颅脑损伤患者早期伤情改变的ROC曲线
表3 2组颅脑损伤患者发热可能原因分析[例（%）]
发热可能原因 预后不良组(n=289) 预后良好组(n=122) χ2值 P值
单纯肺部感染 154(53.2) 36(29.5) 21.728 <0.001
单纯颅内感染 3(1.0) 2(1.6)   0.320
合并肺部及颅内感染 3(1.0) 0   0.285
其他原因 129(44.8) 84(68.9) 20.136 <0.001
[1]
Gao G, Wu X, Feng J, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury in China: a prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, observational study[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2020, 19(8): 670-677.
[2]
费舟，章翔.二次脑损伤[J].中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2006, 5(5): 471-473.
[3]
黄超，黄庆华，尤荻,等.槲皮素在创伤性脑损伤治疗中潜在分子机制和临床应用的可行性[J].中国组织工程研究, 2019, 23(23): 3760-3766.
[4]
郭旭东，沈江洁.急性颅脑损伤凝血功能变化对病情进展及预后的影响[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 6(6): 356-359.
[5]
陈昊阳，王翀.虾青素对创伤性颅脑损伤保护作用的研究进展[J].中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2019, 9(4): 246-250.
[6]
Jones PA, Andrews PJ, Midgley S, et al. Measuring the burden of secondary insults in head-injured patients during intensive care[J]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 1994, 6(1): 4-14.
[7]
Greer DM, Funk SE, Reaven NL, et al. Impact of fever on outcome in patients with stroke and neurologic injury: a comprehensive meta-analysis[J]. Stroke, 2008, 39(11): 3029-3035.
[8]
MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators, Perel P, Arango M, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients[J]. BMJ, 2008, 336(7641): 425-429.
[9]
Murray GD, Butcher I, Mchugh GS, et al. Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2007, 24(2): 329-337.
[10]
陈江龙，史新宇，程军,等.人脐带间充质干细胞对大鼠创伤性脑损伤后血脑屏障的保护[J].中国组织工程研究, 2020, 24(25): 3947-3952.
[11]
Lee JC, Cho JH, Lee TK, et al. Effect of hyperthermia on calbindin-D 28k immunoreactivity in the hippocampal formation following transient global cerebral ischemia in gerbils[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2017, 12(9): 1458-1464.
[12]
Zlotnik A, Gurevich B, Artru AA, et al. The effect of hyperthermia on blood glutamate levels[J]. Anesth Analg, 2010, 111(6): 1497-1504.
[13]
Li J, Jiang JY. Chinese head trauma data bank: effect of hyperthermia on the outcome of acute head trauma patients[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2012, 29(1): 96-100.
[14]
Hifumi T, Kuroda Y, Kawakita K, et al. Fever control management is preferable to mild therapeutic hypothermia in traumatic brain injury patients with abbreviated injury scale 3-4: a multi-center, randomized controlled trial[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2016, 33(11): 1047-1053.
[15]
Hinson HE, Rowell S, Morris C, et al. Early fever after trauma: Does it matter?[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2018, 84(1): 19-24.
[16]
Hinson HE, Schreiber MA, Laurie AL, et al. Early fever as a predictor of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity in traumatic brain injury[J]. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2017, 32(5): E50-E54.
[17]
包龙，徐峰，丁礼,等.热负荷对创伤性颅脑损伤患者的预后价值[J].中华急诊医学杂志, 2014, 23(5): 491-495.
[18]
费舟，晁晓东.加强二次脑损伤因素的循证医学研究[J].解放军医学杂志, 2012, 37(2): 90-93.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[3] 王鹏, 肖厚安, 贾赤宇. 不同因素调控巨噬细胞极化在慢性难愈性创面中的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(05): 454-459.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[6] 黄汇, 朱信强. 131I治疗45岁以下分化型甲状腺癌的疗效及影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 627-630.
[7] 王帆, 马秋月, 刘小莉. 基于分位数回归模型的切口疝手术患者住院费用影响因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-529.
[8] 顾娇娇, 邹燕, 陈奕辰, 黄师菊, 张慧玲, 林楠. 基于简易营养评价精法评估肝癌患者出院后营养状况及其影响因素[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 534-539.
[9] 杨静, 顾红叶, 赵莹莹, 孙梦霞, 查园园, 王琪. 老年血液透析患者短期死亡的影响因素及列线图预测模型的预测作用[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 254-259.
[10] 李飞翔, 段虎斌, 李晋虎, 吴昊, 王永红, 范益民. 急性颅脑损伤继发下肢静脉血栓的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 277-282.
[11] 潘立, 谢理政, 程宏伟, 茆翔. 创伤性颅脑损伤后垂体功能减退[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 308-312.
[12] 刘代江, 蒋俊艳, 万晓强, 马莎英. 结直肠癌肝转移患者生存状况及预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 284-288.
[13] 辛彩焕, 熊辉. 非疫区36例布鲁菌病患者的临床特征及诊疗分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 927-931.
[14] 杜振双, 胡清福, 林颖艺, 张月霞, 陈美丽, 李祎祺, 王振华. 社区全科医师激励机制的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 876-883.
[15] 姚雄宇, 董秀哲, 李晓刚, 张恩浩, 侯国军. 布鲁菌病致前列腺炎合并脊柱炎一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 624-626.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号