切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (06) : 367 -370. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2018.06.012

所属专题: 文献

短篇论著

介入栓塞术治疗颈内动脉-后交通段动脉瘤的临床疗效分析
张东焕1, 王宏磊1, 孟浩1, 刘天一1, 冯颖利1, 齐远1, 徐宁1,()   
  1. 1. 130021 长春,吉林大学第一医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-10 出版日期:2018-12-15
  • 通信作者: 徐宁

Clinical analysis of interventional embolization for internal carotid artery-posterior communicating segment aneurysms

Donghuan Zhang1, Honglei Wang1, Hao Meng1, Tianyi Liu1, Yingli Feng1, Yuan Qi1, Ning Xu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
  • Received:2018-11-10 Published:2018-12-15
  • Corresponding author: Ning Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Ning, Email:
引用本文:

张东焕, 王宏磊, 孟浩, 刘天一, 冯颖利, 齐远, 徐宁. 介入栓塞术治疗颈内动脉-后交通段动脉瘤的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(06): 367-370.

Donghuan Zhang, Honglei Wang, Hao Meng, Tianyi Liu, Yingli Feng, Yuan Qi, Ning Xu. Clinical analysis of interventional embolization for internal carotid artery-posterior communicating segment aneurysms[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(06): 367-370.

目的

分析介入栓塞术治疗颈内动脉-后交通段动脉瘤的复发情况及与形态学的关系。

方法

选取吉林大学第一医院神经外科自2013年9月至2017年6月行介入栓塞治疗的起源于后交通动脉的动脉瘤患者57例。根据头数字减影血管造影将患者分为:a型、b型及c型。采用单纯栓塞及支架辅助栓塞治疗,依据Raymand分级评估栓塞疗效,及术后6个月~1年的复发率。

结果

a型9例;b型33例;c型15例。57例随访患者中,复发11例,术后总体复发率为19.3%。其中b型动脉瘤中,复发患者为7例,复发率为21.2%;c型动脉瘤中,复发患者为4例,复发率为26.7%。

结论

颈内动脉-后交通段动脉瘤栓塞术后复发集中于b型及c型动脉瘤。

Objective

To analyze the recurrence of internal carotid artery-posterior communicating segment aneurysms treated by interventional embolization and its relationship with morphology.

Methods

Fifty-seven patients with aneurysms originating from posterior communicating artery treated by interventional embolization from September 2013 to June 2017 in Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, were chosen in our study. These patients were divided into type a, b and c according to DSA, and received simple embolization and stent assisted embolization. The embolization efficacy was evaluated according to Raymand classification, and the effect was reviewed after 6 months to 1 year.

Results

There were 9 cases of type a, 33 cases of type b, 15 cases of type c. Of the 57 patients who followed up, 11 patients recurred, and the overall recurrence rate was 19.3%. Of the type b aneurysms, 7 patients recurred and the recurrence rate was 21.2%; and of type c, 4 patients recurred, and the recurrence rate was 26.7%.

Conclusion

Recurrence of internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery after embolization focused on type b and type c aneurysms.

图1 颈内动脉-后交通段动脉瘤的患者分型
图1 颈内动脉-后交通段动脉瘤栓塞术前术后影像图
[1]
Kawabata Y, Nakazawa T, Fukuda S. Endovascular embolization of branch-incorporated cerebral aneurysms[J]. Neuroradiol J, 2017, 30(6):600-606.
[2]
Yang Y, Su W, Meng Q. Endovascular treatment of ruptured true posterior communicating artery aneurysms[J]. Turk Neurosurg, 2015, 25(1):73-77.
[3]
Kim BM, Park SI, Kim DJ, et al. Endovascular coil embolization of aneurysms with a branch incorporated into the sac[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2010, 31(1):145-151.
[4]
Misaki K, Takao H, Suzuki T, et al. Estimated pretreatment hemodynamic prognostic factors of aneurysm recurrence after endovascular embolization[J]. Technol Health Care, 2017, 25(5):843-850.
[5]
Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils[J]. Stroke, 2003, 34(6):1398-1403.
[6]
Sugiyama S, Niizuma K, Sato K, et al. Blood flow into basilar tip aneurysms: a predictor for recanalization after coil embolization[J]. Stroke, 2016, 47(10):2541-2547.
[7]
Thiarawat P, Jahromi BR, Kozyrev DA, et al. Microneurosurgical management of posterior communicating artery aneurysm: a contemporary series from Helsinki[J]. World Neurosurgery, 2017, 101:379-388.
[8]
Golshani K, Ferrell A, Zomorodi A, et al. A review of the management of posterior communicating artery aneurysms in the modern era[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2010, 1:88.
[9]
Ko JH, Kim YJ. Endovascular strategies for treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysm according to angiographic architecture: preservation vs. sacrifice of posterior communication artery[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2017, 23(6):620-627.
[10]
Sforza DM, Putman CM, Cebral JR. Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms[J]. Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2009, 41:91-107.
[11]
Cho YD, Lee WJ, Kim KM, et al. Stent-assisted coil embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2013, 34(11):2171-2176.
[12]
Choque VJ, Lau J, Kozyrev D, et al. Clean, fast and preserving normal anatomy: "the Helsinki revolution" in microneurosurgery[J]. J Neurosurg Sci, 2015, 60(1):44-53.
[13]
Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT)[J]. Stroke, 2007, 38(5):1538-1544.
[14]
Cho YD, Jung SC, Kim CH, et al. Posterior communicating artery compromise in coil embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms[J]. Clin Neuroradiol, 2015, 25(3):275-279.
[15]
Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils[J]. Stroke, 2003, 34(6):1398-1403.
[1] 李传玉, 徐伟伟, 韦翠翠, 黄海能, 黄华东, 罗起胜, 罗琨祥, 覃成箭, 栗学玉, 郑传华, 蓝川琉, 王向宇. 颅内破裂动脉瘤介入栓塞患者早期预后相关因素分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 06(03): 145-150.
[2] 黎鹏程, 任刚, 张继志, 徐铭蔚, 邓东风. 基于DICOM影像融合技术3D打印脑动静脉畸形模型的介入治疗应用研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 06(01): 49-52.
[3] 冯振广, 郑首学, 常斌鸽, 王嵩, 王晨, 盛志国, 周宝生, 万晨光, 李牧. 创伤性椎动脉断裂介入栓塞治疗一例并文献复习[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2016, 02(01): 54-56.
[4] 周根, 李彦钊, 邓东风, 董斌, 张绪新, 刘群, 徐国伟. 高级别颅内动脉瘤保守治疗后行血管内栓塞治疗的预后观察[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2018, 08(01): 33-36.
[5] 赵飞龙, 王斌, 祖庆泉, 赵林波, 贾振宇, 施海彬, 刘圣. 血管内栓塞治疗后交通动脉动脉瘤性动眼神经麻痹临床效果及预后因素分析[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2020, 08(02): 151-154.
阅读次数
全文


摘要