切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (03) : 132 -138. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2018.03.002

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

经乙状窦后-内听道入路微创手术治疗听神经瘤
陈立华1, 徐如祥1,(), 李文德1, 于斌1, 张洪钿1, 赵浩1   
  1. 1. 100700 北京,陆军总医院附属八一脑科医院
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-13 出版日期:2018-06-15
  • 通信作者: 徐如祥

Minimally invasive treatment for acoustic neuromas by retrosigmoid transmeatus approach

Lihua Chen1, Ruxiang Xu1,(), Wende Li1, Bin Yu1, Hongtian Zhang1, Hao Zhao1   

  1. 1. The Affiliated Bayi Brain Hospital, the Military General Hospital of Beijing PLA, Beijing 100700, China
  • Received:2018-04-13 Published:2018-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Ruxiang Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Ruxiang, Email:
引用本文:

陈立华, 徐如祥, 李文德, 于斌, 张洪钿, 赵浩. 经乙状窦后-内听道入路微创手术治疗听神经瘤[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(03): 132-138.

Lihua Chen, Ruxiang Xu, Wende Li, Bin Yu, Hongtian Zhang, Hao Zhao. Minimally invasive treatment for acoustic neuromas by retrosigmoid transmeatus approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(03): 132-138.

目的

探讨听神经瘤微创显微手术切除听神经瘤的手术方法和技巧,以提高肿瘤的全切除率和面神经的功能保护率。

方法

回顾性分析陆军总医院附属八一脑科医院自2000年1月至2017年12月应用多模态技术辅助经枕下乙状窦后-内听道入路微创手术治疗的887例听神经瘤患者的临床资料。术后3个月常规复查增强MRI明确肿瘤切除程度,评估面神经功能。

结果

肿瘤全切841例,全切除率为94.8%。术中面神经解剖保留832例,面神经解剖保留率为93.7%;解剖未能保留的55例,其中16例术中行面神经端-端吻合,另有3例术后行面神经移植。肿瘤切除3个月后复查,面神经功能Ⅰ~Ⅱ级695例(78.4%),Ⅲ~Ⅳ级176例(19.8%),Ⅴ级16例(1.8%)。

结论

听神经瘤微创显微手术有助于提高肿瘤切除的安全性和手术疗效,熟练掌握显微手术技巧是提高肿瘤全切除、面神经解剖和功能保护率的关键。

Objective

To explore surgical methods and techniques of minimally invasive microsurgical resection of acoustic neuroma, in order to improve the total resection rate of tumor and the protective rate of facial nerve.

Methods

Eight hundred and eighty-seven patients suffering from acoustic neuromas treated microsurgically by suboccipital retrosigmoid transmeatus approach were analyzed retrospectively between January 2000 and December 2017. Routine reexamination of enhanced MRI and assessment of facial nerve function were performed in 3 months after operation.

Results

Total resection of the tumor was achieved microsurgically in 841 cases, the total removal rate was 94.8%. The facial nerve was preserved anatomically in 832 cases during the operation, the facial nerve anatomic reservation rate was 93.7%. Fifty-five cases were not preserved in the anatomy, 16 of them received end to end anastomosis of facial nerve, and 3 cases underwent facial nerve grafting after operation. After 3 months of tumor resection, 695 cases (78.4%) of facial nerve function were restored to House-Brackmann (H-B) grade I to Ⅱ, 176 cases(19.8%) H-B grade III to Ⅳ and 16 cases (1.8%) H-B grade V.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive microsurgery for acoustic neuroma is helpful to improve the safety and surgical effect of tumor resection. Mastery of microsurgical skills is the key to the improvement of total tumor resection, facial nerve anatomy and function protection.

图1 左侧听神经瘤术前增强MR资料
图2 经乙状窦后-内听道入路微创手术术中图像
图3 经乙状窦后-内听道入路微创手术术后复查增强MRI
表1 听神经瘤大小与面神经位置的关系[例(%)]
[1]
Li H,Wang L,Hao S, et al. Identification of the facial nerve in relation to vestibular schwannoma using preoperative diffusion tensor tractography and intraoperative tractography-integrated neuronavigation system[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 107: 669-677.
[2]
Borghei-Razavi H,Darvish O,Schick U. Disabling veaigo and tinnitus caused by intrameatal compression of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery on the vestibulocochlear nerve: a case repon, surgical considerations, and review of the literature[J]. J Neural Surg Rep, 2014, 75(1): e47-e51.
[3]
Taddei G,Marrelli A,Trovarelli D, et al. Facial functional outcome in monitored versus not-monitored patients in vestibular schwannomas surgery[J]. Asian J Neurosurg, 2016, 11(4): 402-406.
[4]
Zhang Y,Chen Y,Zou Y, et al. Facial nerve preservation with preoperative identification and intraoperative monitoring in large vestibular schwannoma surgery[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2013, 155(10): 1857-1862.
[5]
Pannullo SC,Fraser JF,Molitemo J, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery: a meta-analysis of current therapeutic applications in neuro-oncologic disease[J]. J Neurooncol, 2011, 103(1): 1-17.
[6]
Nonaka Y,Fukushima T,Watanabe K, et al. Surgical management of vestibular schwannomas after failed radiation treatment[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2016, 39(2): 303-312.
[7]
Hajioff D,Raut VV,Walsh RM, et al. Conservative management of vestibular schwannomas: third review of a 10-year prospective study[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2008, 33(3): 255-259.
[8]
Carlson ML,Tveiten OV,Driscoll CL, et al. Long-term quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannoma: an international multicenter cross-sectional study comparing microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, observation, and nontumor controls[J]. J Neurosurg, 2015, 122(4): 833-842.
[9]
Paldor I,Chen AS,Kaye AH. Growth rate of vestibular schwannoma[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2016, 32: 1-8.
[10]
Mastronardi L,Cacciotti G,Scipio ED, et al. Safety and usefulness of flexible hand-held laser fibers in microsurgical removal of acoustic neuromas (vestibular schwannomas)[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2016, 145: 35-40.
[11]
Huang X,Xu J,Xu M, et al. Functional outcome and complications after the microsurgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a retrospective review of 16- year experience in a single hospital[J]. BMC Neurol, 2017, 17(1): 18.
[12]
Tomita Y,Tosaka M,Aihara M, et al. Growth of primary and remnant vestibular schwannomas: a three-year follow-up study[J]. World Neurosurg, 2015, 83(6): 937-944.
[13]
Samii M,Gerganov V,Samii A. Improved preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery via the retrosigmoid approach in a series of 200 patients[J]. J Neurosurg, 2006, 105(4): 527-535.
[14]
Jacob JT,Carlson ML,Driscoll CL, et al. Volumetric analysis of tumor control following subtotal and near-total resection of vestibular schwannoma[J]. Laryngoscope, 2016, 126(8): 1877-1882.
[15]
Pieper DR. The endoscopic approach to vestibular schwannomas and posterolateral skull base pathology[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2012, 45(2): 439-454.
[1] 肖甜甜, 高淑强, 巨容, 李华英. 新生儿化脓性腮腺炎临床分析及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(03): 335-340.
[2] 王黎, 李佳蔓. 术前右美托咪定滴鼻联合腹横肌平面及髂腹下-髂腹股沟神经阻滞对行全身麻醉腹股沟疝手术患者的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(04): 396-399.
[3] 盛成俊, 沈宇晟, 李彦东, 贺诗茹, 吴徐超, 赵小玉, 曾加, 麦麦提力·米吉提, 更·党木仁加甫, 朱国华. Koos3、4级前庭神经鞘瘤在桥小脑角区的生长方向对面神经功能的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 216-221.
[4] 张永明, 许少年, 赵鹏程, 姜国伟, 张圣帮, 丁俊, 钱峰. 神经电生理监测下显微血管减压术治疗左侧面肌痉挛[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 191-192.
[5] 朱治, 蒋伟超, 陈曦, 陈四方, 宋宁宁, 李玉魁, 肖菲, 谭国伟. 听神经瘤术后面神经功能损伤危险因素分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2020, 06(06): 325-331.
[6] 成刚, 陈旭, 岳勇. 听神经瘤枕下乙状窦后入路显微切除术后面神经功能损伤的危险因素分析[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(03): 137-141.
[7] 于炎冰. 锁孔手术治疗听神经瘤的策略[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(02): 126-128.
[8] 钟东. 内听道的个体化处理策略在听神经瘤显微外科手术中的意义[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 1-8.
[9] 王柏嵊, 张黎, 于炎冰. 面肌痉挛病因学的研究进展[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 246-248.
[10] 冯兆海, 裴祎楠, 哈里木热提·帕尔哈提, 郝玉军, 姜磊. 术中神经电生理监测相关危险因素分析及预防策略[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(04): 232-236.
[11] 汤志刚, 杨继若, 蒲宁, 白晶梅. 头体针并用治疗周围性面瘫验案[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 53-53.
[12] 郑哲涵, 丁淑强. 针刺治疗顽固性面瘫医案[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2022, 11(04): 142-143.
[13] 周熙, 王竹行, 田丰玮, 毛廷丽. 经筋刺法对难治性面瘫患者面神经功能的影响[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2022, 11(03): 95-99.
[14] 张静. 针刺治疗Mobius综合征验案[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2022, 11(02): 53-54.
[15] 何伟. 电针疏密波和连续波治疗周围性面神经麻痹的临床研究[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2021, 10(03): 89-91.
阅读次数
全文


摘要