切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 04 ›› Issue (02) : 89 -97. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2018.02.007

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

经胼胝体-透明隔-穹窿间入路的临床应用
陈立华1, 徐如祥1,(), 张丽1, 李文德1, 于斌1, 高进宝1   
  1. 1. 100700 北京,陆军总医院附属八一脑科医院
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-28 出版日期:2018-04-15
  • 通信作者: 徐如祥

Clinical application of the transcallosal-septum-interforniceal approach

Lihua Chen1, Ruxiang Xu1,(), Li Zhang1, Wende Li1, Bin Yu1, Jinbao Gao1   

  1. 1. The Affiliated Bayi Brain Hospital, the Military General Hospital of Beijing PLA, Beijing 100700, China
  • Received:2017-12-28 Published:2018-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Ruxiang Xu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xu Ruxiang, Email:
引用本文:

陈立华, 徐如祥, 张丽, 李文德, 于斌, 高进宝. 经胼胝体-透明隔-穹窿间入路的临床应用[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2018, 04(02): 89-97.

Lihua Chen, Ruxiang Xu, Li Zhang, Wende Li, Bin Yu, Jinbao Gao. Clinical application of the transcallosal-septum-interforniceal approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 04(02): 89-97.

目的

探讨经胼胝体-透明隔-穹窿间入路显微手术切除三脑室内肿瘤的手术适应证、优缺点,并对相应的显微解剖要点和术后并发症的处理进行讨论。

方法

回顾性分析2004年9月至2017年8月期间陆军总医院附属八一脑科医院收治的经显微手术切除三脑室内肿瘤的42例患者的临床资料,并分析讨论如何预防术中并发症和术后管理。

结果

肿瘤全切除者37例,全切除率88.1%,近全切除和大部分切除者5例,无死亡病例。术后近期并发症主要为一过性尿崩症(23例)、电解质紊乱(17例)、中枢性高热(11例),经处理后1~2周消失;前额硬膜下积气(7例)、额顶部硬膜下积液(3例),均经保守治疗后自行吸收消失;术后短期内记忆力下降、空间分辨力下降者3例,均于3个月内恢复。术后远期并发症有脑积水1例,术后3个月行脑室-腹腔分流术。全组患者均随访3~64个月,全切除的37例,术后随访期间复查头颅MRI未见肿瘤残留及复发;未获全切除的5例术后接受立体定向放射治疗,3例肿瘤增大,接受再次伽玛刀治疗。

结论

经胼胝体-透明隔-穹窿间入路处理第三脑室肿瘤,创伤小,能提供清晰、宽广的术野。肿瘤全切除率较高,术后并发症少,是显微手术切除三脑室内肿瘤的理想入路。

Objective

To investigate the surgical indications, advantages and disadvantages of microsurgical resection of three intraventricular tumors through the transcallosal-septum-interforniceal approach, and to discuss the correlative microsurgical anatomy and treatment of postoperative complications.

Methods

The clinical data of 42 patients with three intraventricular tumors who underwent microsurgical resection from September 2004 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Analysis of how to prevent intraoperative complications and postoperative management.

Results

Total resection was achieved in 37 cases, total resection rate was 88.1%, near total and subtotal resection in 5 cases, and no deaths. The main complications were diabetes insipidus (23 cases), electrolyte disorder (17 cases), central high fever (11 cases), treated from 1 to 2 weeks to disappear; forehead subdural pneumatosis (7 cases), frontoparietal subdural effusion (3 cases), were treated by conservative treatment on their own absorption and disappeared; postoperative short-term memory loss, spatial resolution decreased in 3 cases, both in the 3 months of recovery. Postoperative long-term complications included hydrocephalus in 1 patient and ventriculoperitoneal shunt in 3 months after operation. All patients were followed up for 3-64 months, 37 cases of total resection, postoperative follow-up period of cranial MRI showed no tumor residual and recurrence; not total resection of 5 cases underwent stereotactic radiotherapy, 3 cases increasing with tumor size, treated with gamma knife.

Conclusion

The transcallosal-septum-interforniceal approach for microsurgically removing the third ventricle tumors is a slight trauma, can provide clear and the quite large operation field, and the total resection rate is high, and the postoperative complications are less, which is the ideal approach to microsurgical resection of three intraventricular tumors.

图1 典型三脑室内肿瘤患者术前影像特征
图2 经胼胝体-穹窿间入路术中照片
图3 典型三脑室内肿瘤患者术后CT和增强MRI复查资料
[1]
Zhang H,Zhang Y,Zhang L, et al. Three-dimensional imaging anatomic study and clinical application of the third ventricle transcallosal-transforniceal approach[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2017, 28(6): e587-e591.
[2]
Apuzzo ML,Chikovani OK,Gott PS, et al. Transcallosal, interfornicial approaches for lesions affecting the third ventricle: surgical considerations and consequences[J]. Neurosurgery, 1982, 10(5): 547-554.
[3]
马振宇,张玉琪,罗世祺.经胼胝体-穹窿间入路切除儿童第三脑室肿瘤[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2000, 16(4): 207-209.
[4]
李光旭,万伟庆,王玉海,等.穹窿的显微解剖及其在经胼胝体-穹窿间入路中的应用[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2014, 30(12): 1266-1270.
[5]
Winkler PA,Weis S,Buttner A, et al. The transcallosal interforniceal approach to the third ventricle: anatomic and microsurgicalaspects[J]. Neurosurgery, 1997, 40(5): 973-981; discussion 981-982.
[6]
Shapiro S,Rodger R,Shah M, et al. Interhemispheric transeallosal subchoreidal fomix-sparing craniotomy for total resection of colloid cysts of the third ventricle[J]. J Neurosurg, 2009, 110(1): 112-115.
[7]
Hutter BO,Spetzger U,Bertalanffy H, et al. Cognition and quality of life in patients after transcallosal microsurgery for midline tumors[J]. J Neurosurg Sci, 1997, 41(1): 123-129.
[8]
Shucart WA,Stein BM. Transcallosal approach to the anterior ventricular system[J]. Neuresurgery, 1978, 3(3): 339-343.
[9]
Winkler PA,Ilmberger J,Krishnan KG, et al. Transcallosal interfomiceal-transforaminal approach for removing lesions occupying the third ventrieular space, clinical and neuropsychological results[J]. Neurosurgery, 2000, 46(4): 879-888; discussion 888-890.
[10]
Milligan BD,Meyer FB. Morbidity of transcallosal and transcortical approaches to lesions in and around the lateral and third ventricles: a single-institution experience[J]. Neuresurgery, 2010, 67(6): 1483-1496.
[11]
Siwanuwatn R,Deshmukh P,Feiz-Erfan I, et al. Microsurgical anatomy of the transcallosal anterior interforniceal approach to the third ventricle[J]. Neurosurgery, 2008, 62(6 Suppl 3): 1059-1065.
[12]
Jung TY,Jung S,Jang WY, et al. Operative outcomes and adjuvant treatment of purely third ventricle craniopharyngioma after a transcallosal approach[J]. Br J Neurosurg, 2012, 26(3): 355-360.
[13]
Aryan HE,Ozgur BM,Jandial R, et al. Complications of interhemispheric transcallosal approach in children, review of 15 years experienee[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2006, 108(8): 790-793.
[14]
张宏伟,张明山,夏雷,等.经胼胝体-穹窿间入路切除第三脑室内部及其后部肿瘤的临床治疗探讨[J].中华外科杂志, 2012, 50(2): 139-143.
[15]
张玉琪.儿童颅咽管瘤的治疗策略[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2009, 25(5): 385-386.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[3] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[4] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[5] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[6] 唐旭, 韩冰, 刘威, 陈茹星. 结直肠癌根治术后隐匿性肝转移危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 16-20.
[7] 张生军, 赵阿静, 李守博, 郝祥宏, 刘敏丽. 高糖通过HGF/c-met通路促进结直肠癌侵袭和迁移的实验研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[8] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[9] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[10] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[11] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[12] 钱龙, 陆晓峰, 王行舟, 杜峻峰, 沈晓菲, 管文贤. 神经系统调控胃肠道肿瘤免疫应答研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 86-89.
[13] 曹长青, 郭新艳, 高源, 张存, 唐海利, 樊东, 杨小军, 张松, 赵华栋. 肿瘤微环境参与介导HER2阳性乳腺癌曲妥珠单抗耐药的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 90-95.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 徐军, 姬园园, 陈君平, 王健. 伴菊形团结构的脑膜瘤合并颅骨侵犯一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 916-919.
阅读次数
全文


摘要