切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (03) : 142 -145. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2017.03.004

所属专题: 文献

临床研究

改良皮下隧道式腰大池外引流置管方法在临床中的应用及优点
曾振坤1,(), 伍海青1, 王慧萍2, 柯以铨3, 文平3, 杨志林3   
  1. 1. 523290 东莞市石碣医院神经外科
    2. 100029 北京,中日友好医院外科重症医学科
    3. 510280 广州,南方医科大学珠江医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-06 出版日期:2017-06-15
  • 通信作者: 曾振坤

Clinical application and advantages of modified subcutaneous tunnel external drainage of lumbar cistern

Zhenkun Zeng1,(), Haiqing Wu1, Huiping Wang2, Yiquan Ke3, Ping Wen3, Zhilin Yang3   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Shijie Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan 523290, China
    2. SICU, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
    3. Department of Neurosurgery, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510280, China
  • Received:2017-03-06 Published:2017-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Zhenkun Zeng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zeng Zhenkun, Email:
引用本文:

曾振坤, 伍海青, 王慧萍, 柯以铨, 文平, 杨志林. 改良皮下隧道式腰大池外引流置管方法在临床中的应用及优点[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2017, 03(03): 142-145.

Zhenkun Zeng, Haiqing Wu, Huiping Wang, Yiquan Ke, Ping Wen, Zhilin Yang. Clinical application and advantages of modified subcutaneous tunnel external drainage of lumbar cistern[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 03(03): 142-145.

目的

探讨腰大池置管外引流术中应用改良皮下隧道式置管方法的优点及临床运用。

方法

选择自2015年3月到2016年12月东莞市石碣医院及南方医科大学附属珠江医院神经外科收治的无颅内感染且有留置腰大池外引流管适应征患者92例为研究对象,随机分成2组(各46例)进行回顾性临床分析,采用改良皮下隧道式腰大池外引流置管方法的病例为观察组,采用常规腰大池外引流置管的病例为对照组,观察并对比2组在颅内感染、穿刺点脑脊液漏、导管移位、非计划拔管、未按规定时间换药等方面的差异。

结果

观察组46例运用改良皮下隧道式置管方法置管的病例中,在穿刺点脑脊液漏、导管移位及未按规定时间换药等方面的发生率均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。而在颅内感染及非计划拔管的方面观察组发生率为2.2%(1/46),对照组发生率为8.7%(4/46),虽然差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但在数据方面看,仍有发生率减少的优势。

结论

运用改良皮下隧道式腰大池外引流置管方法与常规腰大池置管方法相比,在减少置管后所观察的5种并发症发生率方面优点突出,改良方法在临床工作中可行性大。

Objective

To explore the advantages and clinical application of modified subcutaneous tunnel placement method in external drainage of lumbar cistern.

Methods

Ninety-two patients with no intracranial infection and indications of indwelling drainage tube outside the lumbar cistern, admitted to Department of Neurosurgery of Shijie Hospital of Dongguan City and Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University from March 2015 to December 2016, were randomly divided into 2 groups. The cases of modified subcutaneous tunnel external drainage were used as observation group, and the control group was treated with external drainage of lumbar cistern, Observe and compare the two groups in intracranial infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, catheter displacement, unplanned extubation, not in accordance with the provisions of the time and other aspects of change.

Results

The observation group of 46 cases using the modified subcutaneous tunnel catheter catheterization method in the cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage in the point of puncture, catheter displacement and not according to the provisions of the incidence of dressing and other aspects of the time were significantly lower than control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the intracranial infection and unplanned extubation in the observation group the incidence rate was 2.2% (1/46), the control group the incidence rate was 8.7% (4/46), although no statistically significant difference (P>0.05), but in terms of data, there are still advantages in reducing the incidence of.

Conclusion

Compared with the conventional method of lumbar cistern catheterization, the modified subcutaneous tunnel external drainage method was superior to the conventional method in the management of 5 complications, so the improved method is feasible in clinical work.

图1 改良皮下隧道式腰大池外引流置管方法
表1 2组腰大池置管病例观察指标比较[例(%)]
[1]
於永,崔明.持续腰大池引流在神经外科的应用[J].中国实用医药, 2016, 11(19): 105-106.
[2]
罗成义,徐如祥.腰大池持续外引流治疗脑脊液漏的临床观察[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2005, 4(3): 273-274.
[3]
严朝俊.腰大池置管持续外引流治疗34例外伤性脑脊液漏疗效观察[J].中国卫生标准管理, 2014, 5(17): 19-20.
[4]
张玉成,叶淦湖,谷晓辉,等.早期腰大池持续外引流治疗外伤性蛛网膜下腔出血[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2005, 4(12): 1258-1260.
[5]
祝启海,夏国庆,宋伟,等.腰大池置管引流治疗颅内感染的疗效初步评定[J].中国实用医药, 2016, 11(24): 18-19.
[6]
刘春波,王穗暖,屈洪涛.腰大池引流对继发性脑积水分流术疗效预判的作用[J].临床神经外科杂志, 2016, 13(1): 70-71.
[7]
郑文贺,黄惠斌.改良持续腰大池引流术在治疗神经重症患者中的应用研究[J].白求恩医学杂志, 2016, 14(4): 442-444.
[8]
罗晨,陈彦飞,李常伟,等.腰大池置管持续外引流在神经外科的临床应用体会[J].浙江创伤外科, 2014, 19(2): 277-278.
[9]
吴中华,王斌,史锡文,等.腰大池引流的并发症及处理措施[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2016, 19(7): 93-95.
[10]
伍海青,张玉成,余俐,等.腰大池引流在脑肿瘤切除术中的辅助作用46例分析[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2005, 4(3): 272-273.
[11]
赵继宗.神经外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2007: 591.
[12]
杨树源,只达石.神经外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2008: 348.
[13]
董利英.神经外科躁动患者腰大池引流管用3M加压固定胶带"十字"固定的效果观察[J].护理学报, 2013, 20(10A): 53-54.
[14]
邓天芳,顾建华.腰大池引流管不同固定方法的效果比较[J].医学信息, 2015, (35): 333-334.
[15]
高书媛,吴元蓉.皮下隧道式腰大池外引流治疗结核性脑膜炎的护理[J].护士进修杂志, 2014, 29(4): 369-370.
No related articles found!
阅读次数
全文


摘要