切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 01 ›› Issue (03) : 152 -157. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2015.03.008

临床研究

脑梗死患者同侧颈动脉颅外段狭窄的血管内治疗
丁晓东1, 孙鹏1, 张勇2, 赵彦1,(), 陈晓东1   
  1. 1.266000 青岛,青岛大学附属医院神经外科
    2.266000 青岛大学附属医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-23 出版日期:2015-06-15
  • 通信作者: 赵彦
  • 基金资助:
    山东省高层次卫生科技人才海内外培训专项经费资助青岛市科技发展计划(07-2-1-12-nsh-2)

Endovascular treatment of cerebral infarction patients ipsilateral extracranial carotid artery stenosis

Xiaodong Ding1, Peng Sun1, Yong Zhang2, Yan Zhao1,(), Xiaodong Chen1   

  1. 1.Department of Neurosugery,The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000,China
    2.Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000,China
  • Received:2014-11-23 Published:2015-06-15
  • Corresponding author: Yan Zhao
引用本文:

丁晓东, 孙鹏, 张勇, 赵彦, 陈晓东. 脑梗死患者同侧颈动脉颅外段狭窄的血管内治疗[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2015, 01(03): 152-157.

Xiaodong Ding, Peng Sun, Yong Zhang, Yan Zhao, Xiaodong Chen. Endovascular treatment of cerebral infarction patients ipsilateral extracranial carotid artery stenosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2015, 01(03): 152-157.

目的

探讨脑梗死患者颅外段颈动脉狭窄血管内支架治疗的安全性、中短期疗效和适应证的掌握。

方法

回顾性分析2009年1月至2014年12月在青岛大学附属医院神经科收治的行血管内支架治疗的颅外段颈动脉狭窄的病例,对其中106例既往有脑梗死患者的资料进行了研究,分析其临床特点、治疗方法及预后。

结果

106例患者120个支架均置放满意。术后并发脑出血3例;支架内血栓形成2例;低血压、心动过缓6例;血管痉挛11例;消化道应激性出血1例;再狭窄8例,无脑梗死事件发生。除1例脑出血死亡、8例再狭窄外,其余97例患者中短期疗效满意。对83例患者随访3月至5年,未出现相关脑缺血症状或新发脑梗死。

结论

血管内治疗颈动脉狭窄安全有效,适合既往存在脑梗死的患者;对此类患者应更慎重地个体化地评估手术风险,严格掌握手术适应证;围手术期的综合处理措施是防治并发症的关键。

Objective

To evaluate the safety,middle or short-term effect and indication of the endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke patients with extracranial carotid stenosis.

Methods

The clinical data of Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from June 2009 to December 2014 with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for extracranial carotid artery stenosis cases were retrospectively reviewed,from which 106 cases of ischemic stroke in the past were selected to study.And summarized the information including operation opportunity,operation experience,serious complications such as cerebral hemorrhage and secondary ischemic stroke.Their clinical features,method of treatments and prognosis were analyzed Specially.

Results

The placement of 106 cases with 120 stents was satisfaction.Cerebral hemorrhage occurred in 3 cases;thrombosis following stent placement in 2, hypotension and bradycardia in 6, vasospasm in 11, gastrointestinal stress bleeding in 1, restenosis occurred in 8,no cerebral infarction occurred after operation.Apart from one case of death cerebral hemorrhage, 8 of restenosis. The remaining 97 patients, middle or short-term results were satisfactory.Eighty-three cases were followed up for 3 months to 5 years,no ischemic attack and cerebral infarction occurred.

Conclusion

The satisfactory effect and safety were achieved in the therapy of carotid stenosis by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting, Angioplasty and stenting may improve the cerebral hemodynamics of patients with severe/moderate internal carotid artery stenosis. it is suitable forprevious ischemic stroke patients; We must be individualized to more carefully assess these patients'surgical risk,strictly adhere to the indications of surgery,and general measures is the key of preventing the complications during the perioperative period.

图1 患者手术前后颅内血流灌注对比 A:术前右侧颈总动脉造影,可见颈内动脉重度狭窄;B:支架置入术后右侧颈总动脉造影,狭窄显著改善;C:为该患者术前术后同一时相颅内血流灌注对比:可见术前右侧大脑前动脉、大脑中动脉显影延迟、浅淡、充盈较差,提示右侧半球灌注明显不足;D:支架术后同一时相造影剂显影情况,可见右侧半球血流灌注得到明显改善,远端血管充盈良好。
图2 患者术前及术后CT头颅成像 A:术前头颅CT示右侧额叶脑梗死;B:术后3 d CT见原脑梗死区出血并周围水肿
图3 患者行全脑血管造影及支架成形术影像表现 A:DSA示左侧颈内动脉自起始处闭塞;B:右侧颈动脉重度狭窄、斑块溃疡形成;C:右侧颈动脉PTAS术后DSA示起始段狭窄改善满意;D:支架术后同一时相见前大脑前动脉、大脑中动脉充盈良好,右侧半球血流灌注改善显著
图4 一例放弃手术的患者影像学检查 A:头颅MR1示右侧颞枕叶亚急性-慢性期梗塞灶伴出血;脑内多发缺血灶、软化灶;B:DSA示右侧颈内动脉极度狭窄;C-D:颅内段充盈缓慢,右侧大脑中充盈不佳,右侧大脑前未见显影
[1]
Feigin VL,Forouzanfar MH,Krishnamurthi R,et al.Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010[J]. Lancet, 2014, 383(9913):245-254.
[2]
Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update:a report from the American Heart Association[J].Circulation,2011,123(4):e18-e209.
[3]
Thanvi B, Treadwell S, Robinson T. Early neurological deterioration in acute ischaemic stroke: predictors, mechanisms and management[J].Postgrad Med J,2008,84(994):412-417.
[4]
缪中荣,马宁.缺血性脑血管病的血管内治疗[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志,2013,13(3):170-173.
[5]
Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G, et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis[J]. N Engl J Med,2010,363(1):11-23.
[6]
Brott TG,Halperin JL,Abbara S,et al.2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease:executive summary[J]. J Neurointerv Surg,2011,3:100-130.
[7]
Saw J. Carotid artery stenting for stroke prevention[J]. Can J Cardiol,2014,30(1):22-34.
[8]
Veselka J,Zimolova P,Cerna D,et al.Carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and surgically high-risk patients: single-centre,single-operator results[J].Int J Angiol,2008,17(4):207-210.
[9]
Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP. et al. Stenting versus aggressive medical theyapy for intracranial arterial stenosis[J].N Engl J Med,2011,365(11):993-1003.
[10]
黄志新,殷勤.颈动脉狭窄的血管内介入治疗[J].国际脑血管病杂志,2013,21(11):867-874.
[11]
Henry M, Polydorou A, Henry I, et al. Carotid angioplasty and Stenting under protection:advantages and drawbacks[J].Expert Rev Med Devices,2008,5(5):591-603.
[12]
Ederle J,Featherstone RL,Brown MM.Randomjzed controlled trials comparing endarterectomy and endovascular treatment for carotid artery stenosis: a Cochrane systematic review[J].Stroke,2009,40(4):1373-1380.
[13]
De Rango P, Parlani G, Verzini F, et al. Long-term prevention of stroke: a modem comparison of current carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy[J]. J Am Co ⅡCardiol, 2011, 57(6):664-671.
[14]
赵晖,陶庆玲,孙暄,等.颈动脉支架成形术对缺血性进展性脑卒中的临床观察[J].中华全科医学,2014,12(5):679-681.
[15]
Mas JL, Trinquart L, Leys D, et al. Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA- 3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2008, 7:885-892.
[16]
Eckstein HH, Ringleb P, Allenberg JR, et al. Results of the Stent- Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy(SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial[J]. Lancet Neurol,2008,7(10):862-864.
[17]
Bonati LH, Jongen LM, Haller S, et al. New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS)[J]. Lancet Neurol, 2010, 9(4):353-362.
[18]
李宝民,李小鹰,王鲁宁,等.经皮血管内支架成形术治疗高龄颈动脉狭窄患者的临床研究[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2005,7(2):106-108.
[19]
周定标. 颈动脉内膜切除[M]. 第一版, 北京: 人民军医出版社,2005:106-108.
[20]
王君,李宝民,李生,等.血管内支架成形术治疗颅外段颈动脉狭窄[J].中华外科杂志,2009,47(6):415-418.
[21]
Wylie EJ, Stoney RJ, Ehrenfeld WK. Manual of Vascular Surgery[M].Volume 1,New York:Springer-Verlag,1980.
[22]
Ederle J, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, et al. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis ( International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2010,375(9719):985-997.
[23]
Noorani A, Sadat U, Gaunt Me. Cerebral hemodynamic chaInges following carotid endarterectomy: cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome[J]. Expert Rev Neurother, 20l0, 10(2):217-223.
[24]
Adhjyaman V,Alexander S. Cercbral byperperfusion syndrome following camtid endanerectomy[J]. QJM, 2007, 100(4):239-244.
[25]
Wasser K, Schnaudigel S, Wohlfahrt J, et al. Clinical impact and predictors of carotid artery in-stent restenosis [J]. J Neurol,2012,259(9):1896-1902.
[26]
Kazemi-Bajestani SM, van der Vlugt M, de Leeuw FE,et al.A high prevalence of carotid artery stenosis in male patients older than 65 years, irrespective of presenting clinical manifestation of at herosclerotic diseases[J].Angiology,2013,64(4):281-286.
[27]
Matsumoto S, Nakshara I, Higashi T, et al. Near- infrared spectroscopy in carotid artery stenting predicts cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome[J].Neurology, 2009, 72(17):1512-1518.
[1] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[2] 李佳伟, 庞建智, 闫鹏宇, 卫阳兵, 杨晓峰. 术中输尿管识别技术研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 520-524.
[3] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[4] 张迪, 王春霞, 张学东, 李发馨, 庞淅文, 陈一锋, 张维胜, 王涛. 梗阻性左半结直肠癌自膨式金属支架置入后行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的短期临床疗效比较[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 375-380.
[5] 李刚, 潘晓帆, 田雪, 刘路路. CT灌注成像参数及血栓弹力图对急性前循环脑梗死早期神经功能恶化的预测价值分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 226-232.
[6] 吉莉, 苏云楠, 王斌, 沈滔, 刘团结, 毛蕾, 徐玉萍, 张婷, 王博. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者脑白质微结构改变对长期认知功能损伤的预测价值研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 193-200.
[7] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[8] 王丽娜, 吕书霞, 李亚男. 脑卒中偏瘫患者健康焦虑元认知与疾病接受度、恐惧疾病进展的相关性[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 434-440.
[9] 李璇, 邓岚, 郭微, 邓永梅, 刘杰昕. 标准化皮肤管理流程在防治脑卒中患者失禁相关性皮炎中的应用[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 479-482.
[10] 克地尔牙·马合木提, 胡波, 杨琼, 闫素, 胡岚卿, 高沛沛, 姚恩生. 依达拉奉右莰醇对急性脑梗死后认知功能障碍的疗效观察[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-466.
[11] 牟磊, 徐东成, 韩鑫, 徐长江, 韩坤锜, 薛叶潇, 牟媛, 秦文玲, 刘相静, 陈哲, 高楠. 五虫通络胶囊防治椎动脉开口支架术后再狭窄发生的效果[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 467-472.
[12] 李芳, 戴西望, 王凯, 郭廷昊, 涂江龙. 非瓣膜性心房颤动相关性卒中的治疗研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 393-397.
[13] 刘焕亮, 崔慧娟, 曹慧, 付源. 颈动脉狭窄处剪切率对高同型半胱氨酸血症患者脑梗死的预测价值[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 317-322.
[14] 周洪千, 张煜坤, 顾天舒, 胡苏涛, 姜超, 张雪, 张昊, 陶华岳, 刘行, 刘彤, 陈康寅. 既往出血性脑卒中患者行经皮冠脉介入治疗后不良事件的危险因素分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 323-329.
[15] 程娅雯, 韩香凝, 朱宁, 何彩莲, 张润宁, 于嘉, 韩建峰, 刘福德. 双路途指导下血管内治疗症状性非急性颈内动脉颅内段闭塞的疗效观察[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 330-337.
阅读次数
全文


摘要