切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 81 -85. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2026.02.003

临床研究

高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者气管切开时机及疗效分析
张行, 吕新文, 张超()   
  1. 721008 宝鸡市中心医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-12 出版日期:2026-04-15
  • 通信作者: 张超

Analysis of the timing and efficacy of tracheostomy in patients with high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Xing Zhang, Xinwen Lyu, Chao Zhang()   

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Baoji Central Hospital, Baoji 721008, China
  • Received:2024-11-12 Published:2026-04-15
  • Corresponding author: Chao Zhang
引用本文:

张行, 吕新文, 张超. 高分级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者气管切开时机及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(02): 81-85.

Xing Zhang, Xinwen Lyu, Chao Zhang. Analysis of the timing and efficacy of tracheostomy in patients with high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 12(02): 81-85.

目的

探讨高分级(Hunt-Hess Ⅳ~Ⅴ级)动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)患者行气管切开术的时机及其对临床预后的影响。

方法

回顾性分析宝鸡市中心医院神经外科自2015年1月至2020年6月收治的53例高分级aSAH患者为研究对象。根据气管切开时机将患者分为超早期组(24 h内,32例)和早期组(1~7 d,21例),超早期组于aSAH后24 h内实施气管切开术,早期组于aSAH后1~7 d行气管切开术。比较2组患者神经系统、呼吸系统、气管切开术等相关并发症发生率,以及机械通气、NICU住院时间等临床指标,于发病后6个月采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估神经功能恢复情况。

结果

2组患者术后发生癫痫、脑梗死、颅内再出血、尿路感染、脓毒症、颅内感染、皮下气肿的发生率及PCO2比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);与早期组比较,超早期组患者术后发生胸腔积液、肺部感染、深静脉血栓栓塞的发生率均降低,机械通气时间、堵管时间及NICU住院时间均缩短,血气分析PO2增高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访6个月,2组患者的mRS评分、死亡率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

高分级aSAH患者超早期气管切开可有效降低肺部感染的发生几率,改善患者的呼吸功能,保障组织器官供氧,减少机械通气时间,缩短NICU住院时间,且不增加aSAH手术患者的死亡率和神经功能障碍程度。

Objective

To investigate the timing of tracheotomy in patients with high-grade (Hun-Hess grade Ⅳ-Ⅴ) aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and its impact on clinical prognosis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 53 patients with aSAH admitted to Neurosurgery Department of Baoji Central Hospital from January 2015 to June 2020. The patients were divided into an ultra-early group (32 cases) and an early group (21 cases) according to the timing of tracheotomy. Patients in the ultra-early group underwent tracheostomy within 24 h after aSAH, while those in the early group underwent tracheostomy 1-7 d after aSAH. The incidence of complications related to the nervous system, respiratory system, tracheotomy, as well as indicators such as mechanical ventilation duration and NICU stay, were compared between the two groups. Neurological function recovery was evaluated using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 6 months after onset.

Results

There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative epilepsy, cerebral infarction, intracranial rebleeding, pneumothorax, urinary tract infection, sepsis, intracranial infection, incision infection, airway stenosis, subcutaneous emphysema, PCO2, and bedsores between the two groups of patients. Compared with the early group, the incidence of postoperative pleural effusion, pulmonary infection, and deep vein thrombosis was reduced, the duration of mechanical ventilation, tube blockage, and NICU hospitalization was shortened, and blood gas levels of PO2 were increased in the ultra-early group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). At a 6-month follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in mRS scores and mortality rates between the two groups of patients (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Ultra early tracheostomy in high-grade aSAH patients can effectively reduce the incidence of pulmonary infection, improve respiratory function, ensure oxygen supply to tissues and organs, reduce mechanical ventilation time, shorten NICU hospitalization time, and do not increase the mortality rate and neurological dysfunction of aSAH surgery patients.

表1 2组高分级aSAH患者基线资料比较
Tab.1 Comparison of baseline data between two groups of high-grade aSAH patients
表2 2组高分级aSAH患者并发症及临床指标比较
Tab.2 Comparison of complications and clinical indicators between two groups of high-grade aSAH patients
表3 2组高分级aSAH患者随访6个月的疗效比较
Tab.3 Comparison of therapeutic effects between two groups of high-grade aSAH patients after 6 months of follow-up
[1]
徐建军,王宏磊,乔萌,等.血管内介入治疗合并单侧烟雾病的前交通动脉瘤[J].中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 8(1): 39-43. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2022.01.008.
[2]
Sakata H, Endo H. Postoperative management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. No Shinkei Geka, 2024, 52(5): 906-913. DOI: 10.11477/mf.1436204998.
[3]
Ali M, van Eldik MJA, Rietkerken S, et al. Risk factors of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage including analysis by sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Neurology, 2025, 104(8): e213511. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213511.
[4]
Overstijns M, El Rahal A, Goldberg J, et al. Clinical severity of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage over time: systematic review[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2024, 47(1): 257. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02467-0.
[5]
Bösel J. Tracheostomy in stroke patients[J]. Curr Treat Options Neurol, 2014, 16(1): 274. DOI: 10.1007/s11940-013-0274-1.
[6]
Chen XH, Zhao JJ, Chen C, et al. Establishment and validation of a predictive model for tracheotomy in critically ill patients and analysis of the impact of different tracheotomy timing on patient prognosis[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2024, 24(1): 175. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02558-x.
[7]
Han R, Gao X, Gao Y, et al. Effect of tracheotomy timing on patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. PLoS One, 2024, 19(7): e0307267. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307267.
[8]
Turković TM, Lukić A, Perić M. Early versus late percutaneous tracheotomy in critically ill patients: a retrospective single center observational study[J]. Acta Clin Croat, 2016, 55 Suppl 1: 33-40.
[9]
Liu CC, Livingstone D, Dixon E, et al. Early versus late tracheostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 152(2): 219-227. DOI: 10.1177/0194599814561606.
[10]
Szakmany T, Russell P, Wilkes AR, et al. Effect of early tracheostomy on resource utilization and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2015, 114(3): 396-405. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu440.
[11]
Morales Rosario OI, Lagazzi E, Panossian VS, et al. Timing of tracheostomy in geriatric patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury: a nationwide analysis[J]. Am J Surg, 2025, 240: 116100. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116100.
[12]
中国残疾人康复协会神经康复专业委员会,中国康复研究中心.神经重症气管切开患者气道功能康复与管理专家共识(2024)[J].中国康复理论与实践, 2024, 30(8): 869-881. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2024.08.001.
[13]
Bösel J, Schiller P, Hook Y, et al. Stroke-related early tracheostomy versus prolonged orotracheal intubation in neurocritical care trial (SETPOINT): a randomized pilot trial[J]. Stroke, 2013, 44(1): 21-28. DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.112.669895.
[14]
Gessler F, Mutlak H, Lamb S, et al. The impact of tracheostomy timing on clinical outcome and adverse events in poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage[J]. Crit Care Med, 2015, 43(11): 2429-2438. DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000001195.
[15]
Kuechler JN, Abusamha A, Ziemann S, et al. Impact of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in brain injured patients[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2015, 137: 137-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.07.007.
[16]
Kleffmann J, Pahl R, Deinsberger W, et al. Effect of percutaneous tracheostomy on intracerebral pressure and perfusion pressure in patients with acute cerebral dysfunction (TIP trial): an observational study[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2012, 17(1): 85-89. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-012-9709-x.
[1] 郑倩, 朱荣平. 支气管肺发育不良超早产儿生后早期血小板参数联合血清粒细胞集落刺激因子水平对预测其首次拔管后72 h内撤机失败的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(06): 681-688.
[2] 杨磊, 王晶晶, 陈辉, 赵春月, 赵筱卓, 藏琳琳, 胡骁骅. 单纯面颈部烧伤或大面积烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者颈部水肿程度的变化规律分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(04): 333-338.
[3] 郝鹏, 李珏菁, 宁寰坤, 丘小红. 纤支镜操作频率与脑死亡潜在供者肺脏成功获取的关联分析:基于倾向性评分的回顾性队列研究[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 414-420.
[4] 胡燕, 王静, 张怡, 李丽华, 杨程, 杨莎. 播散型荚膜组织胞浆菌病合并肺部嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染一例[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 350-352.
[5] 叶玉娇, 李雅雯, 陈茂娴, 唐甜甜, 黄金钰, 邱秀燕. 腹部结核并发肺部感染21例临床特征分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 164-167.
[6] 梅春霞, 冯霞, 邬海桥, 刘攀, 李昆霖, 徐智, 刘禹. 肺损伤预测评分联合血管生成素-2对肺部感染并发急性呼吸窘迫综合征的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(01): 9-14.
[7] 沈方龙, 伍正彬, 邵世锋, 陈地友, 肖钦, 郝志鹏, 王震, 赵辉, 王耀丽. 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的生物电阻抗断层成像特征及预测研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 897-903.
[8] 李晓颜, 邢爱花, 董瑞生, 王瑞玲, 贾子江, 郑丽琴. 血管细胞黏附分子-1、肝素结合蛋白蛋白及调节性T细胞水平检测对支气管哮喘并发肺部感染患者的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 911-916.
[9] 贾贝丽, 冯雅琳, 林苏杰, 刘婧, 张雪丽, 周亚菲. 肺癌患者化疗期间院内肺部感染临床特征及其影响因素[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 742-746.
[10] 黄英, 卢蕾, 谭倩, 罗静, 马丹, 杨莉莉, 赵海燕, 何伟. 结直肠癌并发肺部感染的临床特征分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 818-820.
[11] 同娟, 乔燕, 田丹, 高萌, 毛书祥, 杨洋. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病伴心力衰竭患者继发肺部感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(04): 516-520.
[12] 刘娜, 盛华, 高超. 机械通气与急性肾损伤:从机制到临床实践[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 345-350.
[13] 黄絮. 慢病呼吸机依赖高危人群的特征及其危险因素[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 31-36.
[14] 侯丹, 张辉, 甄洁, 边伟帅, 周建新, 李宏亮. 机械通气患者膈肌功能障碍及膈肌保护性通气研究的文献可视化分析[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2026, 12(01): 76-85.
[15] 徐璐, 刘晶莹, 李梦莹, 黄菊, 谈慧颖. 肺癌患者胸腔镜术后肺部感染预测模型的构建与比较[J/OL]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2026, 13(01): 49-55.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?