切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 235 -241. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2021.04.009

基础研究

CLSPN在胶质瘤中的表达及生物学功能
林发牧1,(), 邓燕婷1, 梁玉明1, 简志聪1, 邓妙峰1, 陈耿树1, 麦剑培1, 钱卫添1, 元少鹏1, 胡建军1   
  1. 1. 528100 佛山,三水区人民医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-26 出版日期:2021-08-11
  • 通信作者: 林发牧

Expression and biological function of CLSPN in glioma

Famu Lin1,(), Yanting Deng1, Yuming Liang1, Zhicong Jian1, Miaofeng Deng1, Gengshu Chen1, Jianpei Ma1, Weitian Qian1, Shaopeng Yuan1, Jianjun Hu1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Sanshui District People’s Hospital, Foshan 528100, China
  • Received:2020-12-26 Published:2021-08-11
  • Corresponding author: Famu Lin
引用本文:

林发牧, 邓燕婷, 梁玉明, 简志聪, 邓妙峰, 陈耿树, 麦剑培, 钱卫添, 元少鹏, 胡建军. CLSPN在胶质瘤中的表达及生物学功能[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(04): 235-241.

Famu Lin, Yanting Deng, Yuming Liang, Zhicong Jian, Miaofeng Deng, Gengshu Chen, Jianpei Ma, Weitian Qian, Shaopeng Yuan, Jianjun Hu. Expression and biological function of CLSPN in glioma[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 07(04): 235-241.

目的

研究CLSPN在胶质瘤中的表达特征,以及CLSPN对胶质瘤肿瘤生物学功能的影响及分子信号通路。

方法

通过人类蛋白数据库(TCGA)和胶质瘤数据库(CGGA)探讨CLSPN在胶质瘤中的转录水平特征,及其与患者生存期的关系;通过胶质瘤标本芯片进行CLSPN的免疫组织化学染色实验分析CLSPN在胶质瘤中蛋白表达水平,及其与患者生存期的关系。用shRNA干扰CLSPN在U87 MG细胞中的表达,然后通过CCK8细胞增殖检测、EdU染色、细胞单克隆实验、细胞周期实验分析CLSPN对U87 MG细胞增殖和周期的影响;通过Genecards数据分析CLSPN参与的分子信号通路,通过蛋白印记实验验证干扰CLSPN蛋白表达对细胞周期关键蛋白表达量的影响。

结果

人基因和蛋白库数据显示CLSPN在中枢神经系统组织中的转录水平较低;CLSPN在胶质瘤细胞系中的转录水平较高。TCGA联合GTEx数据分析发现,相比较于正常脑组织,高级别胶质瘤CLSPN的转录水平显著增高(P<0.05),而低级别胶质瘤则差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);并且,高CLSPN转录水平和低CLSPN转录水平的胶质瘤患者中位生存期差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),CLSPN的转录水平越高,胶质瘤患者的中位生存期越短。组织芯片结果显示,CLSPN在胶质母细胞瘤中的蛋白水平显著高于正常脑组织(P<0.05)。相比较于空载质粒组,干扰U87 MG细胞CLSPN表达后,U87 MG细胞增殖减慢、EdU阳性细胞数减少、形成克隆团数减少,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干扰CLSPN后U87 MG细胞G1/G0期细胞数量增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。TCGA转录组数据显示,CLSPN转录水平与Ki67(MKI67)转录水平成显著正相关(P<0.05)。体内成瘤实验发现,敲除CLSPN表达后U87 MG在裸鼠颅内生长明显抑制,空载质粒组和干扰CLSPN表达组肿瘤信号值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),并且,空载质粒组和干扰CLSPN表达组间生存曲线差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),干扰CLSPN表达组小鼠生存期延长。信号通路富集分析可见,CLSPN参与的分子信号通路前10位包括细胞周期检查点通路。蛋白印记检测发现,敲低U87 MG细胞CLSPN的表达后,P53、p21、p27的蛋白表达量明显升高,而CDK2、CDK4、Cyclin D、Cyclin E1的蛋白表达量明显降低。

结论

CLSPN在胶质瘤中高表达,高水平CLSPN预示胶质瘤患者生存期较差。CLSPN通过调控了P53-p21/p27分子信号通路调控了细胞G0/G1期周期从而影响胶质母细胞瘤的增殖能力。CLSPN可能是一个潜在的胶质母细胞瘤治疗靶点。

Objective

To study the expression characteristics of CLSPN in glioma, the influence of CLSPN on the biological function of glioma and the molecular signaling pathway.

Methods

The expression characteristics of CLSPN in nervous system and its relationship with patient survival time were investigated by using human protein database [The Cancer Genome (TCGA) and the glioma database Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA)]. The level of protein expression of CLSPN in glioma and its relationship to patient survival time were analyzed by immunohistochemical staining experiments ofCLSPN via glioma specimen chip. shRNA was used to interfere the expression of CLSPN in U87 MG cells, and then the effects of CLSPN on the proliferation and cycle of U87 MG cells were analyzed by CCK8 cell proliferation assay, EdU staining, cell monoclonal antibody assay and cell cycle assay. The molecular signaling pathways involved in CLSPN were analyzed by Genecards data, and the effect of interfering CLSPN protein expression on the expression of key proteins in cell cycle was verified by western blotting.

Results

Human gene and protein database data showed that the transcription level of CLSPN in central nervous system tissues was low. CLSPN transcription was higher in glioma cell lines. TCGA combined with GTEx data analysis found that compared with normal brain tissue, the transcription level of high-grade glioma CLSPN was significantly higher (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in low grade glioma (P>0.05); Moreover, there were significant differences in median survival time between glioma patients with high and low CLSPN transcription levels (P<0.05), the higher the transcription level of CLSPN, the shorter the median survival time of glioma patients. Tissue microarray results showed that CLSPN protein levels in glioblastoma were significantly higher than those in normal brain tissue (P<0.05). Compared with the no-load plasmid group, the reduction of CLSPN expression in U87 MG cells resulted in a decrease of the proliferation of U87 MG cells, the number of EdU positive cells, and the number of clonal groups, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The number of G1/G0 cells in U87 MG cells increased after Interference with CLSPN, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). TCGA transcriptional data show that transcription levels of CLSPN were significantly positively associated with Ki67 (MKI67) transcription levels (P<0.05). In vivo tumor formation experiments showed that the growth of U87 MG in the brain of nude mice was significantly inhibited after CLSPN expression was knocked out, and there were statistically significant differences in tumor signal values between the no-load plasmid group and the group that interfered with CLSPN expression (P<0.05), and there were statistically significant differences in survival curves between the no-load plasmid group and the CLSPN expression interference group (P<0.05). The survival time of mice in the CLSPN expression interference group was prolonged. Enrichment analysis of signaling pathways showed that the top 10 molecular signaling pathways involved by CLSPN included cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Protein imprinting detection showed that the protein expression levels of P53, p21 and p27 were significantly increased after knockdown of CLSPN in U87 MG cells, while the protein expression levels of CDK2, CDK4, Cyclin D and Cyclin E1 were significantly decreased.

Conclusion

CLSPN is highly expressed in glioma, and a high level of CLSPN predicts a poor survival in glioma patients. CLSPN regulates the cell G0/G1 phase by regulating the P53-p21/p27 molecular signaling pathway, thus affecting the proliferation ability of glioblastoma. CLSPN may be a potential therapeutic target for glioblastoma.

图1 CLSPN在胶质瘤中的表达
图2 干扰CLSPN对胶质母细胞瘤细胞系U87 MG的影响
图3 干扰CLSPN对U87 MG细胞体内成瘤的影响
图4 CLSPN参与调控P53-p21/p27细胞周期分子信号通路
[16]
Azenha D, Lopes MC, Martins TC. Claspin: from replication stress and DNA damage responses to cancer therapy[J]. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol, 2019, 115: 203-246.
[17]
Bianco JN, Bergoglio V, Lin YL, et al. Overexpression of Claspin and timeless protects cancer cells from replication stress in a checkpoint-independent manner[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1): 910.
[18]
Zhang J, Song YH, Brannigan BW, et al. Prevalence and functional analysis of sequence variants in the ATR checkpoint mediator Claspin[J]. Mol Cancer Res, 2009, 7(9): 1510-1516.
[19]
Erkko H, Pylkäs K, Karppinen SM, et al. Germline alterations in the CLSPN gene in breast cancer families[J]. Cancer Lett, 2008, 261(1): 93-97.
[20]
Wang X, Szabo C, Qian C, et al. Mutational analysis of thirty-two double-strand DNA break repair genes in breast and pancreatic cancers[J]. Cancer Res, 2008, 68(4): 971-975.
[21]
Madeira A, Azenha D, Correia L, et al. 724 Claspin mutations and loss of function may contribute to breast carcinogenesis and gliomagenesis[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2012, 48(Suppl 5): S172.
[22]
Jung D, Khurana A, Roy D, et al. Quinacrine upregulates p21/p27 independent of p53 through autophagy-mediated downregulation of p62-Skp2 axis in ovarian cancer[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 2487.
[1]
郭张超,夏祥国,陈礼刚, 等. 基于CGGA数据库的胶质瘤临床预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2020, 25(6): 538-543.
[2]
Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009, 10(5): 459-466.
[3]
顾润环,朱尔春. 替莫唑胺联合放疗治疗恶性脑胶质瘤患者的临床研究[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志, 2020, 36(10): 1202-1204, 1227.
[4]
Chen J, Li Y, Yu TS, et al. A restricted cell population propagates glioblastoma growth after chemotherapy[J]. Nature, 2012, 488(7412): 522-526.
[5]
Wilcox JA, Ramakrishna R, Magge R. Immunotherapy in glioblastoma[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 116: 518-528.
[6]
Lee JK, Choi YL, Kwon M, et al. Mechanisms and consequences of cancer genome instability: lessons from genome sequencing studies[J]. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis, 2016, 11: 283-312.
[7]
李娟,孙冉冉,孙继红, 等. 下调Claspin抑制肝癌增殖的研究[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2018, 35(9): 1743-1746.
[8]
Lin YF, Shih HY, Shang Z, et al. DNA-PKcs is required to maintain stability of Chk1 and Claspin for optimal replication stress response[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2014, 42(7): 4463-4473.
[9]
冀晓莉,戴世鹏,全冠民. 高级别脑胶质瘤IDH表型与预后相关性的MR研究进展[J]. 国际医学放射学杂志, 2020, 43(3): 299-303.
[10]
Chen R, Smith-Cohn M, Cohen AL, et al. Glioma subclassifications and their clinical significance[J]. Neurotherapeutics, 2017, 14(2): 284-297.
[11]
Gusyatiner O, Hegi ME. Glioma epigenetics: from subclassification to novel treatment options[J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2018, 51: 50-58.
[12]
Wild P, Matos J. Cell cycle control of DNA joint molecule resolution[J]. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2016, 40: 74-80.
[13]
Engeland K. Cell cycle arrest through indirect transcriptional repression by p53: I have a draem[J]. Cell Death Differ, 2018, 25(1): 114-132.
[14]
Smits VAJ, Cabrera E, Freire R, et al. Claspin - checkpoint adaptor and DNA replication factor[J]. FEBS J, 2019, 286(3): 441-455.
[15]
Azenha D, Lopes MC, Martins TC. Claspin functions in cell homeostasis-a link to cancer?[J]. DNA Repair (Amst), 2017, 59: 27-33.
[1] 韩丽飞, 吕建鑫, 王宝偲, 曹欣华, 马骁, 胡浩霖, 张亚男. 分化拮抗非蛋白编码RNA调控乳腺癌细胞增殖的机制研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 21-29.
[2] 杨继鑫, 李南林. 细胞周期蛋白依赖激酶4和6抑制剂研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 315-319.
[3] 郭亚楠, 郭文静, 蒋兵, 郭红云, 王涛, 张永东, 苏海翔. 黄腐酚抗乳腺癌作用机制的研究进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 307-310.
[4] 徐颖, 孙强. 细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 247-251.
[5] 孙佳辰, 马景龙, 申传安, 张文, 刘馨竹. 小分子药物Tideglusib通过PI3K/PKB/KIF14通路促进表皮干细胞增殖的机制研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2021, 16(05): 389-397.
[6] 刘伟华, 赵宇, 刘仲凤, 吴焕童, 张广吉, 陈志国. 神经干细胞生物制剂治疗中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤的研究进展[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 59-62.
[7] 兰伟途, 武峰, 何建昌, 兰文达, 王万宏. miRNA-199a-5p靶向CDCA7L对胶质瘤细胞迁移及侵袭的影响[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 272-278.
[8] 冯巍, 袁喜平, 胡丙宇, 刘金涛, 商东升. 外伤后进展性胶质母细胞瘤一例报道并文献复习[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2022, 08(01): 59-60.
[9] 周兴旺, 刘艳辉. 老年胶质母细胞瘤的治疗进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 321-324.
[10] 孙明阳, 刘艳坤, 陈思, 李玉凤, 李玉辉. NHE1抑制剂改善胶质母细胞瘤细胞对替莫唑胺耐药性的研究[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(05): 261-265.
[11] 张婵, 薛强, 田锐锋, 陈晓燕. Kir4.1在恶性胶质瘤中的表达及其潜在作用:数据库结合文献分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(04): 224-234.
[12] 贾伟强, 王兆涛, 徐如祥. 毛蕊花糖苷上调SHP1表达抑制STAT3磷酸化治疗胶质母细胞瘤的分子机制研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(05): 285-293.
[13] 汪泉, 周英妹, 何颖. p27、cyclin-E在子宫内膜异位症中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 546-552.
[14] 刘景卓, 马莉. 艾司洛尔对脓毒症急性肾损伤大鼠的保护作用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 280-287.
[15] 叶飞龙, 杨冠英, 王伟. 对流增强给药治疗胶质母细胞瘤的研究进展[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 287-292.
阅读次数
全文


摘要