切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华神经创伤外科电子杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 03 ›› Issue (05) : 294 -296. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-9141.2017.05.009

所属专题: 文献

短篇论著

舌下神经降支-面神经吻合术治疗听神经瘤术后面瘫的临床分析
沈林1, 刘晓东1,(), 李晋虎1, 柴开君1, 范益民1   
  1. 1. 030001 太原,山西医科大学第一医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-04 出版日期:2017-10-15
  • 通信作者: 刘晓东
  • 基金资助:
    山西省卫计委科研课题(2015025)

Clinical analysis of hypoglossal nerve descending branch facial nerve anastomosis for facial paralysis in acoustic neuroma surgery

Lin Shen1, Xiaodong Liu1,(), Jinhu Li1, Kaijun Chai1, Yimin Fan1   

  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2017-08-04 Published:2017-10-15
  • Corresponding author: Xiaodong Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Xiaodong, Email:
引用本文:

沈林, 刘晓东, 李晋虎, 柴开君, 范益民. 舌下神经降支-面神经吻合术治疗听神经瘤术后面瘫的临床分析[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2017, 03(05): 294-296.

Lin Shen, Xiaodong Liu, Jinhu Li, Kaijun Chai, Yimin Fan. Clinical analysis of hypoglossal nerve descending branch facial nerve anastomosis for facial paralysis in acoustic neuroma surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Neurotraumatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2017, 03(05): 294-296.

目的

探讨舌下神经降支-面神经吻合术在治疗听神经瘤术后并发重度面瘫的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析自2015年1月至2016年5月于山西医科大学第一医院神经外科收治的接受面神经吻合的患者6例,其中女性4例,男性2例,年龄26~65岁,平均年龄45.5岁,均为听神经瘤术后并发重度面瘫患者。术前、术后采用House-Brackman评分系统进行面神经功能评估,6例患者均行舌下神经降支与面神经吻合术,术后随访至少12个月。

结果

术后使用House-Brackman面神经功能评价系统进行评价:Ⅱ级的1例,Ⅲ级的2例,Ⅳ级的2例,Ⅴ级的1例。患者面部感觉均较术前提高,在静态时的面容对称除1例外,其余5例均较满意,而且其中1例眼睑可完全闭合,眼裂基本消失。所有患者均无同侧舌肌瘫痪,均无明显的的发音和吞咽功能障碍。

结论

舌下神经降支-面神经吻合术可以作为听神经瘤术后并发周围性面瘫的一种有效治疗手段。

Objective

To evaluate the effiency of descending hypoglossal branch-facial nerve anastomosis for the severe facial palsy after acoustic neuroma surgery.

Methods

The clinical data of 6 patients (2 males, 4 females, average age 45.5 years old) underwent descending hypoglossal branch-facial nerve anastomosis for treatment of unilateral facial palsy was analyzed retrospectively. All patients previously had undergone resection of an acoustic neuroma. House-Brackman grading system was used to assess the pre-, post-operative and follow up facial nerve function status. The patients were followed up for at least 12 months.

Results

According to the House-Brackman facial nerve function evaluation system, 1 case is Ⅱ grade, 2 cases are grade Ⅲ, 2 cases are grade IV, 1 case is Ⅴ grade. Patients with facial sensations were improved compared with preoperative. In the 6 patients, 5 patients had satisfactory facial symmetry, and one patient could close the eyelid, and the eye crack almost disappeared. All patients had no paralysis of the ipsilateral lingual muscle and no obvious pronunciation and swallowing dysfunction.

Conclusion

Descending hypoglossal branch-facial nerve anastomosis is effective for facial reanimation.

[1]
Huang X,Xu J,Xu M, et al. Functional outcome and complications after the microsurgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas via the retrosigmoid approach: a retrospective review of 16-year experience in a single hospital[J]. BMC Neurol, 2017, 17(1): 18.
[2]
Catli T,Bayazit YA,Gokdogan O, et al. Facial reanimation with end-to-end hypoglossofacial anastomosis: 20 years’ experience[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2010, 124(1): 23-25.
[3]
Van de Graaf RC,IJpma FF,Nicolai JP. Sir Charles Alfred Ballance (1856-1936) and the introduction of facial nerve crossover anastomosis in 1895[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2009, 62(1): 43-49.
[4]
Rebol J,Milojkovic V,Didanovic V. Side-to-end hypoglossal-facial anastomosis via transposition of the intratemporal facial nerve[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2006, 148(6): 653-657.
[5]
Terzis JK,Noah ME. Analysis of 100 cases of free-muscle transplantation for facial paralysis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1997, 99(7): 1905-1921.
[6]
Yoleri L,Songur E,Mavioglu H, et al. Cross-facial nerve grafting as an adjunct to hypoglossal-facial nerve crossover in reanimation of early facial paralysis: clinical and electrophysiological evaluation[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2001, 46(3): 301-307.
[7]
Samii M,Alimohamadi M,Khouzani RK, et al. Comparison of direct side-to-end and end-to-end hypoglossal-facial anasto-mosis for facial nerve repair[J]. World Neurosurg, 2015, 84(2): 368-375.
[8]
梁建涛,李茗初,陈革,等.面神经-舌下神经降支吻合术治疗小脑脑桥角区肿瘤术后重度面瘫[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2016, 32(5): 491-494.
[9]
侯永洁,吴凡,王晓晓.神经生长因子的研究现状[J].河南科技, 2013, (10): 198.
[10]
Wang J,Ding F,Gu Y, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promote cell proliferation and neurotrophic function of Schwann cells in vitro and in vivo[J]. Brain Res, 2009, 1262: 7-15.
[11]
Mahay D,Terenghi G,Shawcross SG. Schwann cell mediated trophic effects by differentiated mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Exp Cell Res, 2008, 314(14): 2692-2701.
[12]
Syed N,Reddy K,Yang DP, et al. Soluble neuregulin-1 has bifunctional, concentration-dependent effects on Schwann cell myelination[J]. J Neurosci, 2010, 30(17): 6122-6131.
[13]
陈蕾,许海凤,李蜀光.胶质细胞源性神经营养因子与面神经损伤及再生的研究进展[J].口腔颌面外科杂志, 2006, 16(4): 375-378.
[14]
Chen YS,Wang-Bennett LT,Coker NJ. Facial nerve regeneration in the silicone chamber: the influence of nerve growth factor[J]. Exp Neurol, 1989, 103(1): 52.
[15]
苏少波,岳树源,张建宁.舌下-面神经吻合术治疗前庭神经鞘瘤术后面瘫[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2013, 29(4): 354-357.
[1] 刘烺飚, 牛磊, 蔡军. λ型食管空肠吻合在全腹腔镜下全胃切除术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 287-291.
[2] 沈新, 陈新莉, 刘海旺, 杨洁, 马佳佳, 任敬, 彭年才. 吲哚菁绿荧光融合影像技术在腹腔镜全胃切除+Roux-en-Y吻合中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 651-654.
[3] 梁昌隆, 林方德, 蔡用军, 陈化磊. 胃后壁吻合和胃大弯侧残角吻合在腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术Roux-en-Y重建中的对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 655-658.
[4] 李勇军, 杨能红. 三种不同胰肠吻合方法的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术临床对比研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 663-666.
[5] 魏世东, 孙劲文, 李霞. 全腹腔镜下改良三角吻合术与小切口重建术治疗乙状结肠癌的效果比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 514-517.
[6] 李仕发, 冉文华, 黄自铎, 孙占虎, 廖齐. 不同消化道重建方式用于远端胃癌根治术3年随访比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 541-544.
[7] 邹庆涛, 张洪贞, 尹作文, 喻军, 张鹏. 食管胃结合部腺癌根治术三种消化道重建方式的临床效果评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 545-548.
[8] 王兴麟, 傅厚丰, 梁振雄, 李炳. “一针法”胰肠吻合在腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术中安全性评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 374-377.
[9] 王德娟. 腹腔镜下膀胱根治性切除+双侧输尿管双J管置入+回肠原位新膀胱+盆腔淋巴结清扫+回肠侧侧吻合术[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 99-99.
[10] 陈雪岩, 孟兴凯. 肝门空肠吻合术在肝门部胆管癌根治术中的应用价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 440-443.
[11] 李利平, 游意莹, 沈宁, 曹宏, 王艳玲. 改良内陷式胰肠吻合在胰十二指肠切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2022, 11(05): 458-462.
[12] 张剑明, 叶文慧, 牟廷裕, 蓝孝亮, 邓海军. 腹腔镜全结直肠切除、回肠J型储袋-肛管吻合术近期并发症及防治策略[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 388-395.
[13] 盛成俊, 沈宇晟, 李彦东, 贺诗茹, 吴徐超, 赵小玉, 曾加, 麦麦提力·米吉提, 更·党木仁加甫, 朱国华. Koos3、4级前庭神经鞘瘤在桥小脑角区的生长方向对面神经功能的影响[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 216-221.
[14] 汤志刚, 杨继若, 蒲宁, 白晶梅. 头体针并用治疗周围性面瘫验案[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 53-53.
[15] 赵中海, 朱立东, 杨宁. 经皮穿刺空肠-胆管取石术在胆肠吻合术后狭窄伴结石中的应用(附18例报告)[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 113-116.
阅读次数
全文


摘要